Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Aphasia: The Case of Mr. C

REFERENCES

• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay P, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen IS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. I Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:172–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Robey RR. Aphasia treatment: recovery, prognosis and clinical effectiveness. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2001:148–172.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Robey RR. Aphasia treatment: recovery, prognosis and clinical effectiveness. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2008:186–202.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dorze G, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology. 1995;9:239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefaucheur J-P. Methods of therapeutic cortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;39:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey RL, Nudo RJ. Cortical brain stimulation: a potential therapeutic agent for upper limb motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey R, Stinear JW. Cortical stimulation as an adjuvant to upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;2:S269–S278.
   Google Scholar
• Talelli P, Rothwell J. Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:543–550.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Erickson RK, Small SL. Epidural cortical stimulation as adjunctive treatment for non-fluent aphasia: preliminary findings. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;81(9):1014–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton RH, Chrysikou EG, Coslett B. Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain Lang. 2011;118:40–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland R, Crinion J. Can tDCS enhance treatment of aphasia after stroke? Aphasiology. 2012;26: 1169–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarization induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:600–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. I Physiol. 2000;527:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:206–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, et al. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. I Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(4):451–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein J, Brady-Wagner LC. Is informed consent a "Yes or No" response? Enhancing the shared decision-making process for persons with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(4):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You D-S, Kim D-Y, Chun MH, Jung SE, Park SJ. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang. 2011;119:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang EK, Kim YK, Sohn HM, Cohen LG, Paik N-J. Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca's homologue area. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29:141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floel A, Meinzer M, Kitstein R, et al. Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke. 2011;42:2065–2067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines BW, Norton AC, Schlaug G. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy. Front Psychol. 2011;2:230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010;41:1229–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangolo P, Marinelli CV, Bonifazi S, et al. Electrical stimulation over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) determines long-term effects in therecovery of speech apraxia in three chronic aphasics. Behav Brain Res. 2011;225:498–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori V, Coccia M, Marinelli CV, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and non- fluent aphasic subjects. I Cogn Neurosci. 2010;23:2309–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson J, Richardson JD, Baker JM, Rorden C. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke. 2011;42:819–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallett M. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1623–1629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, Grodzinsky A, Zahn M., Pascual-Leone A.. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neurolmage. 2007;35:1113–1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta A,Baker1M,Bikson M,FridrikssonJ.Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimul. 2011;4:169–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea Febiger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery Revised. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III) Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Connors CK. Continuous Performance Test II. Toronto: Multihealth Systems Inc; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S, Elbard H, Finlayson A, Zoghaib C. The Communicative Effectiveness Index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional measure for adult aphasia. I Speech Hear Dis. 1989;54:113–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherney LR, Babbitt EM, Semik P, Heinemann AW. Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 1. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Cherney LR. Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 2. Aphasiology. 2011; 25:727–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin PI, Naeser MA, Ho M, et al. Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009;9(6):451–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient - case report. Neurocase. 2005;11(3):182–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang. 2005;93:95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeser MA, Martin PI, Treglia E, et al. Research with rTMS in the treatment of aphasia. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28:511–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitsche MA., Doemkes S, Karaköse T, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. I Neurophysiol. 2007;97(4):3109–3117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, Bardeleben A, Jenrich W, Kirker SGB. Combined transcranial direct curent stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR. Efficacy of oral reading in the treatment of two patients with chronic Broca's aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil, 1995;2(1):57–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherney L, Merbitz C, Grip J. Efficacy of oral reading in aphasia treatment outcome. Rehabil Lit. 1986;112–119.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR. Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA): impact of aphasia severity on cross-modal outcomes in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2010;31:42–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherney LR. Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA): evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2010;17(6):423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz RC, Wertz RT. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. I Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:493–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson PM, Robey RR. Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006;16(4):161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries. Volume I, Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. April 2001 : vii. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/clinical/Vo11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz CW, et al. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1689–1697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmelman J. The therapeutic misconception at 25: treatment, research, and confusion. Hastings Center Report. 2007;27(6):36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng S, Grady C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, &therapeutic optimism. /RB.2003;25(1):11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007;72:208–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int I Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14:1133–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:175–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar