Setting a Research Agenda to Inform Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs

REFERENCES

• Rose ML, Cherney LR, Worrall LE. Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: An international survey of practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollaghan CA. Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: What do we know, and when do we know it? J Commun Disord. 2004;37(5):391–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persad C, Wozniak L, Kostopoulos E. Retrospective analysis of outcomes from two intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):388–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Worrall LE, Cherney LR. Clinician perspectives of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):398–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 5:1–228.
   Google Scholar
• Robey RR, Schultz MC. Review: A model for conducting clinical-outcome research: An adaptation of the standard protocol for use in aphasiology. Aphasiology. 1998;12(9):787–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J. 2000;321(7262):694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J, Gordon W, Rothi U. A phased developmental approach to neurorehabilitation research: The science of knowledge building. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(11):S3–S10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Beeson P, Holland A, et al. Translational research in aphasia: From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S259–S275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer AM. Intensity of aphasia therapy: Evidence and efficacy. 2011;11(6):560–569.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR. Aphasia treatment: Intensity, dose parameters, and script training. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(5):424–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34(4):987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert ML, Sparks RW, Helm NA. Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1973;29(2):130–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns KR Response elaboration training for patient initiated utterances. Clin Aphasiol. 1985;15: 196-204.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbek JC, Lemme ML, Ahern MB, Harris EH, Wertz RT. A treatment for apraxia of speech in adults. J Speech Hear Disord. 1973;38(4):462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyle M, Coelho CA. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1995; 4(4): 94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Robey RR. A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research. J Commun Disord. 2004; 37(5):401–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley JJ, Craig HK. Influence of rate of treatment on the naming abilities of adults with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 1998; 12(11):989–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C, Torney A, Gildea-Howardine E., Willmes K.. Outcome of a one-month therapy intensive for chronic aphasia: Variable individual responses. Semin Speech Lang. 2010;31(1):21–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winans-Mitrik R, Schumacher JG, Hula WD, Dickey MW, Doyle PJ. Description of an intensive residential aphasia treatment program: Rationale, clinical processes, and outcomes. Presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 2013; Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Worrall L, McKinnon E, et al. Therapeutic effect of an intensive, comprehensive aphasia program: Aphasia LIFT. Presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 2013; Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA, Schallert T. Motor enrichment and the induction of plasticity before or after brain injury. Neurochem Res. 2003;28(11):1757–1769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodlee MT, Schallert T. The interplay between behavior and neurodegeneration in rat models of Parkinson's disease and stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3):153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz RT, Weiss DG, Aten IL, et al. Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Arch Neurol. 1986;43(7):653–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41 (1):172–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo F, Williamson J. Interpreting causality in the health sciences. Int Stud Philos Sci. 2007; 21(2):157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11): 1179–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007; 45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coster WI, Haley SM, Jette AM. Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(4):237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massof RW, Ahmadian L, Grover LL, et al. The activity inventory: An adaptive visual function questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84(8): 763–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle PJ, McNeil MR, Bost JE, et al. The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provided valid, reliable, and responsive score estimates of functioning and well-being during the first year of recovery from stroke. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(8):1389–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Bode R, Lai SM, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long A, Hesketh A, Paszek G, Booth M, Bowen A. Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: The Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(12):1083–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle PJ, Hula WD, Hula SNA, et al. Self-and surrogate-reported communication functioning in aphasia. Qual Life Res. 2012; 22(5):957–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A, et al. Counting what counts: A framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology. 2008;22(3):258–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chue WL, Rose ML. The reliability of the Communication Disability Profile: A patient-reported outcome measure for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2010;64(6-8):940–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Cherney LR. Communication confidence in persons with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(3):214–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping DL, Smith SC. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1944–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(4):295–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Blinding in randomised trials: Hiding who got what. Lancet (Lond). 2002;359(9307):696–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massof RW. A general theoretical framework for interpreting patient-reported outcomes estimated from ordinally scaled item responses [published online ahead of print February 19, 2013]. Stat Methods Med Res.
   Google Scholar
• Riley WT, Glasgow RE, Etheredge L, Abernethy AP. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: A call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clin Transl Med. 2013;2:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chroicn Dis. 1967;20(8):637–648.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials. J Am Med Assoc. 2003; 290(12):1624–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose T, Worrall L, Hickson L, Hoffmann T. Do people with aphasia want written information? A verbal survey exploring preferences for when and how to provide stroke and aphasia information. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(2):79–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose TA, Worrall LE, McKenna KT, Hickson LM, Hoffmann TC. Do people with aphasia receive written stroke and aphasia information? Aphasiology. 2009;23(3):364–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon LE, Rose ML, Worrall L. The efficacy of outpatient and community-based aphasia group interventions: A systematic review [published online ahead of print January 22, 2013). Int J Speech Lang Pathol.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation (Australia). Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. National Stroke Foundation. http://strokefoundation.com.au/health-professionals/. Accessed July 29, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Salter K, Teasell R, Bhogal S, Zettler L, Foley N. Aphasia. Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Stroke Rehabilitation. http://www.ebrsr.com. Accessed July 29, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Allen L, Mehta S, McClure JA, Teasell R. Therapeutic interventions for aphasia initiated more than six months post stroke: A review of the evidence. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(6):523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenburn B, Mahoney K. A meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(11):1338–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(5):1282–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A. Evidence for plasticity in white-matter tracts of patients with chronic Broca's aphasia undergoing intense intonation-based speech therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1169:385–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A. From singing to speaking: Why singing may lead to recovery of expressive language function in patients with Broca's aphasia. Music Percept. 2008;25(4):315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel G, Meinzer M, Djundja D, Rockstroh B. Intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia: Which aspects contribute most? Aphasiology. 2008;22(4):408–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher LM, Kendall D, Swearengin JA, Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Rothi U. A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of constraint induced language therapy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:843–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker E. Optimal intervention intensity. Intl Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(5):401–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Fann JR, Novack TA. The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(1):1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner A, Klar N. Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):416–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: Is cluster randomisation the answer? Br Med J. 2001;322(7282):355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J. 2004;328(7441):702–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Granger CV. Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: A primer and introduction to a series. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73(4): 296–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoagwood K, Hibbs E, Brent D, Jensen P. Introduction to the special section: Efficacy and effectiveness in studies of child and adolescent psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psych. 1995;63(5):683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treweek S, Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials. 2009;10(37):9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): A tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):464–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar