Efficacy and Task Structure of Bimanual Training Post Stroke: A Systematic Review

REFERENCES

• Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2013 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013:e6–e245.
   Google Scholar
• Muntner P, Garrett E, Klag MJ, Coresh J. Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the US population 25 to 74 years of age. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1209–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(8): 852–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin B. Clinical practice: Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engll Med. 2005;352:1677–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-González A, Granat MH. Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts IL, Wolf SL. The use of kinetics as a marker for manual dexterity after stroke and stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(4): 223–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR, Haaland KY. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke. 2009;40(2):545–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaland KY, Mutha PK, Rinehart JK, Daniels M, Cushnyr B, Adair JC. Relationship between arm usage and instrumental activities of daily living after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):1957–1962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen ME, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JB. Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: A study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):1975–1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbreath SL, Heard RC. Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(2):119–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone KD, Bryant DC, Gonzalez CL. Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: Evidence for different roles? Exp Brain Res. 2013;224(3):455–467.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science. 1979;203(4384):1029–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G. Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1991;77(2):137–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers J. Practice and training in bimanual coordination tasks: Strategies and constraints. Brain Cogn. 2002;48(1):166–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustinova KI, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Bilateral coupling facilitates recovery of rhythmical movements from perturbation in healthy and post-stroke subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2013;227(2):263–274 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakzewski L. Bimanual therapy and constraint-induced movement therapy are equally effective in improving hand function in children with congenital hemiplegia. J Physiother. 2012;58(1):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GN, Perreault EJ. An assessment of robot-assisted bimanual movements on upper limb motor coordination following stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009;17(6):595–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Love ML, McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Exploiting interlimb coupling to improve paretic arm reaching performance in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(11):2131–2137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: A pilot study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21(2):124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Neurophysiological and behavioural adaptations to a bilateral training intervention in individuals following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(1):48–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292(15):1853–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Delden AE, Peper CE, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb exercise therapy after stroke: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(2):106–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BM]. 2009;339:b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wulp I, van Stel HF. Calculating kappas from adjusted data improved the comparability of the reliability of triage systems: A comparative study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1256–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRADEPro [computer program]. Version 3.2 for Windows. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cook C. Clinimetrics corner: Use of effect sizes in describing data. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16: e54–e57.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chang YF, Wu CY, Chen YA. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, et al. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(2):118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JJ, Tung WL, Wu WL, Huang MH, Su FC. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(10):1332–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Burgar CG, Van der Loos M, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Yap R. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(5):631–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Chuang LL, Lin KC, Chen HC, Tsay PK. Randomized trial of distributed constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor control and function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(2):130–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Corriveau H, Gosselin S, Bravo G. Effectiveness of unilateral and symmetrical bilateral task training for arm during the subacute phase after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(6):581–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayner K, Gibson G, Giles GM. Comparison of constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral treatment of equal intensity in people with chronic upper-extremity dysfunction after cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(4):528–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chen YA, Chen CL, Wu CY, Chang Yr. The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(1 ):42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JFI, van VVijck F, Joice S, Ogston SA, Cole I, MacWalter RS. A comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper-limb task training in early poststroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(7):1237–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov ME, Lewis GN, Corcos DM. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(9):945–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards LG, Senesac CR, Davis SB, Woodbury ML, Nadeau SE. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing in chronic stroke: Not always efficacious. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):180–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements. J Physiol. 2002;543(Pt 1):307–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Forrester L, Villagra F, Whitall J. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation with unilateral dominant, unilateral nondominant and bilateral movement tasks in left- and right-handed adults.] Neurol Sci. 2008;269(1-2):96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51 (1):S225–S239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1692–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13-14):823–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Shiffrin R. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:1–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, van Wijck F, Morris J, Langhorne P. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(4):CD006432.
   Google Scholar
• Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M, Editorial Board CcBRG. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(18):1929–1941.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BM J. 2008;336(7650):924–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar