Activation and Environmental Aspects of ARIES-ACT1 Power Plant

References

• H. Y. KHATER et al., “ARIES-ST Safety Design and Analysis,” Fusion Eng. Des., 65, 285 (2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(02)00307-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. J. MERRILL et al., “Safety Assessment of the ARIES Compact Stellarator Design,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 54, 838 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST08-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. COOK, “Analyses Performed Within the European Safety and Environmental Assessment of Fusion Power (SEAFP),” Fusion Eng. Des., 30, 171 (1995); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(94)00407-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. KLUEH et al., “Impurity Effects on Reduced-Activation Ferritic Steels Developed for Fusion Applications,” J. Nucl. Mater., 280, 353 (2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00060-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ARIES Project Web Site: http://aries.ucsd.edu/ARIES/ (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• S. J. ZINKLE et al., “Multimodal Options for Materials Research to Advance the Basis for Fusion Energy in the ITER Era,” Nucl. Fusion, 53, 104024 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/53/10/104024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. J. ZINKLE, “Challenges in Developing Materials for Fusion Technology–Past, Present and Future,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 64, 65 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST13-631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. BALUC et al., “Status of R&D Activities on Materials for Fusion Power Reactors, Nucl. Fusion, 47, 10, 696 (2007); http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/10/S18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “W-Based Alloys for Advanced Divertor Designs: Options and Environmental Impact of State-of-the-Art Alloys,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 60, 185 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST10-269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Goals, Challenges, and Successes of Managing Fusion Active Materials,” Fusion Eng. Des., 83, 928 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ZUCCHETTI et al., “The Back End of the Fusion Materials Cycle,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 55, 109 (2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST09-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY, “Future Trend Toward the Ultimate Goal of Radwaste-Free Fusion: Feasibility of Recycling/Clearance, Avoiding Geological Disposal,” Plasma Fusion Res., 8, 3404041 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1585/pfr.8.3404041.
   Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY and L. CADWALLADER, “Perspectives of Managing Fusion Radioactive Materials: Technical Challenges, Environmental Impact, and U.S. Policy,” Radioactive Waste: Sources, Management and Health Risks, S. FENTON, Ed., Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, New York (2014).
   Google Scholar
• C. E. KESSEL et al., “The ARIES Advanced and Conservative Tokamak Power Plant Study,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 1 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST14-794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY and L. MYNSBERGE, “Neutronics Characteristics and Shielding System for ARIES-ACT1 Power Plant,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 107 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST14-791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. E. ALCOUFFE et al., “PARTISN: A Time-Dependent, Parallel Neutral Particle Transport Code System,” LA-UR-05-3925, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2005).
   Google Scholar
• MCNP X-5 MONTE CARLO TEAM, “MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5,” “Volume I: Overview and Theory,” LA-UR-03-1987; “Volume II: User’s Guide,” LA-CP-03-0245; “Volume III: Developer’s Guide,”LA-CP-03-0284, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Oct. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• “DAGMC Users Guide,” University of Wisconsin–Madison Fusion Technology Institute (2008); https://trac.cae.wisc.edu/trac/svalinn/wiki/DAGMCUsersGuide (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• P. WILSON and D. HENDERSON, “ALARA: Analytic and Laplacian Adaptive Radioactivity Analysis: A Complete Package for Analysis of Induced Activation,” Volume I, UWFDM-1070; Volume II, UWFDM-1071, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (1998).
   Google Scholar
• D. L. ALDAMA and A. TRKOV, “FENDL-2.1 Update of an Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Fusion Applications,” INDC(NDC)-467, International Atomic Energy Agency (2004).
   Google Scholar
• A. PASHCHENKO et al., “FENDL/A-2.0, Nuclear Activation Cross Section Data Library for Fusion Applications,” IAEA-NDS-173, International Atomic Energy Agency (1998).
   Google Scholar
• L. A. EL-GUEBALY, “Nuclear Performance Assessment of ARIES-AT,” Fusion Eng. Des., 80, 99 (2006); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Designing ARIES-CS Compact Radial Build and Nuclear System: Neutronics, Shielding, and Activation,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 54, 747 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST08-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY et al., “Design Challenges and Activation Concerns for ARIES Vacuum Vessel,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 64, 449 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST12-523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. L. KLUEH, D. J. ALEXANDER and P. J. MAZIASZ, “Bainitic Cr-W Steels with 3% Cr,” Metall. Trans., 28A, 335 (1997); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-997-0136-0.
   Google Scholar
• M. JAWAD and V. K. SIKKA, “Development of a New Class of Fe-3Cr-W(V) Ferritic Steels for Industrial Process Applications,” ORNL/TM-2005/82, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2005).
   Google Scholar
• C. MARTIN and L. EL-GUEBALY, “ARIES-ACT-1 Loss of Coolant/Flow Accident Thermal Analysis,” UWFDM-1416, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (2013); http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1416.pdf (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• P. W. HUMRICKHOUSE and B. J. MERRILL, “MELCOR Accident Analysis for ARIES-ACT,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 64, 340 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST12-569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. W. HUMRICKHOUSE and B. J. MERRILL, “ARIES-ACT1 Safety Design and Analysis,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 67, 167 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST14-799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. R. ODETTE and D. T. HOELZER, “Irradiation-Tolerant Nanostructured Ferritic Alloys: Transforming Helium from a Liability to an Asset,” J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc., 62, 9, 84 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-010-0144-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ITER Project Web Site: http://www.iter.org (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY and L. MYNSBERGE, “Neutronics and Shielding Characteristics of ARIES-ACT-2 Power Plant with DCLL Blanket,” UWFDM-1418, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (2014).
   Google Scholar
• D. MAISONNIER et al., “A Conceptual Study of Commercial Fusion Power Plants,” EFDA-RP-RE-5.0, European Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Study (2005).
   Google Scholar
• The ESBWR Design Web Site: http://www.ge-energy.com/products_and_services/products/nuclear_energy/esbwr_nuclear_reactor.jsp (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, “Energy,” Part 61, “Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2014).
   Google Scholar
• S. FETTER, E. T. CHENG, and F. M. MANN, “Long Term Radioactive Waste from Fusion Reactors: Part II,” Fusion Eng. Des., 13, 239 (1990); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(90)90104-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. MASSAUT et al., “State of the Art of Fusion Material Recycling and Remaining Issues,” Fusion Eng. Des., 82, 2844 (2007); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ZUCCHETTI et al., “The Feasibility of Recycling and Clearance of Active Materials from a Fusion Power Plant,” J. Nucl. Mater., 367–370, 1355 (2007); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. DI PACE et al., “Radioactive Waste Management of Fusion Power Plants,” Radioactive Waste, Chap. 14, R. A. RAHMAN, Ed., InTech (2012); http://www.intechopen.com/books/radioactive-waste/radioactive-waste-management-of-fusion-power-plants (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• M. ZUCCHETTI et al., “Recent Advances in Fusion Radioactive Material Studies,” Fusion Eng. Des., 88, 6–8, 652 (2013); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.fusengdes.2013.02.050.
   Google Scholar
• B. KOLBASOV et al., “Some Technological Problems of Fusion Materials Management,” Fusion Eng. Des., 89, 2013 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.01.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Radiological Assessments for Clearance of Materials from Nuclear Facilities,” NUREG-1640, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2003); http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1640/(current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• “Application of the Concepts of Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance,” RS-G-1.7, International Atomic Energy Agency (2004); http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1202_web.pdf (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• L. EL-GUEBALY, P. WILSON, and D. PAIGE, “Evolution of Clearance Standards and Implications for Radwaste Management of Fusion Power Plants,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 49, 62 (2006); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST06-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. MYNSBERGE, “Developments in 3-D Nuclear Analysis: Model Visualization and Robust Activation Analysis,” UWFDM-1420, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute (2014); http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1420.pdf (current as of Aug. 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar