Next European Torus Physics Basis

References

• R. TOSCHI, M. CHAZALON, F. ENGELMANN, J. NIHOUL, J. RAEDER, and E. SALPIETRO, “Next European Torus Objectives, General Requirements, and Parameter Choices,” Fusion Technol., 14, 19 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. BORRASS and W. SPEARS, “Scoping Studies for the Next European Torus,” Fusion Technol., 14, 228 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. McGUIRE, “Observation of Finite-β MHD Phenomena in Tokamaks,” Proc. Int. Conf. Plasma Physics, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 27-July 3, 1984, Vol. I, p. 123.
   Google Scholar
• Report on the 4th European Tokamak Program Workshop, Copenhagen, Denmark, December 4-6, 1985; Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion, 28, 1173 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• O. GRUBER et al., “MHD Stability and Transport of Beam Heated ASDEX Discharges in the Vicinity of the Beta Limit,” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Kyoto, Japan, November 13-20, 1986, paper IAEA-CN-47/A-VI-2, Vol. I, p. 357, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1987).
   Google Scholar
• International Tokamak Reactor Workshop, Report on Phase 2A, Part II, STI/PUB/714, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1986).
   Google Scholar
• F. TROYON and R. GRUBER, “A Semi-Empirical Scaling Law for the β-Limit in Tokamaks,” Phys. Lett., 11A, 29 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. CAMPBELL et al., “Sawteeth and Disruptions in JET,” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Kyoto, Japan, November 13-20, 1986, paper IAEA-CN-47/A-VII-5, Vol. I, p. 433, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1987).
   Google Scholar
• F. WAGNER et al., “Regime of Improved Confinement and High Beta in Neutral-Beam-Heated Divertor Discharges of the ASDEX Tokamak,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 1408 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. GRUBER, “Confinement Regimes in Ohmically and Auxiliary Heated Tokamaks,” Proc. Int. Conf. Plasma Physics, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 27-July 3, 1984, Vol. I, p. 67.
   Google Scholar
• “Annual Report 1985,” Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching (1985).
   Google Scholar
• N. SUZUKI et al., “Characteristics of the H-Mode in Divertor Configuration on JFT-2M Tokamak,” Proc. 14th European Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madrid, Spain, June 22-26, 1987, Part I, p. 217.
   Google Scholar
• M. SHIMADA et al., “H-Mode Investigations in DIIID,” Proc. 14th European Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madrid, Spain, June 22-26, 1987, Part I, p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• A. TANGA et al., “Magnetic Separatrix Experiments in JET,” Nucl. Fusion, 27, 1877 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. F. A. HARRISON, E. S. HOTSTON, and A. De MATTEIS, “Plasma Edge Physics for NET/INTOR,” Next European Torus Report, EUR-FU/XII-361/86/50, Commission of the European Communities (1985).
   Google Scholar
• M. F. A. HARRISON and E. S. HOTSTON, “Advances in Modelling of the Divertor of the Reference Option of NET-DN,” in European Contributions to the International Tokamak Reactor Workshop, Phase 2A, Part III, EUR-FU-BRU/XII-139/88/EDV1, Commission of the European Communities (1988).
   Google Scholar
• M. F. A. HARRISON and E. S. HOTSTON, “The Impact of Magnetic Configuration and Divertor Geometry upon Edge Plasma Conditions in NET/INTOR,” in European Contributions to the International Tokamak Reactor Workshop, Phase 2A, Part III, EUR-FU-BRU/XII-139/88/EDV1, Commission of the European Communities (1988).
   Google Scholar
• M. CHAZALON, J-L. BOUTARD, M. BUDD, A. CARDELLA, W. DÄNNER, P. DINNER, D. EVANS, M. ISELI, E. LIBIN, F. MOONS, J. NIHOUL, M. VAS-SILIADIS, G. VIEIDER, C. H. WU, and E. ZOLTI, “Next European Torus In-Vessel Components,” Fusion Technol., 14, 82 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. F. A. HARRISON and E. S. HOTSTON, “Scaling Relationships for the Edge Plasma in NET,” in European Contributions to the International Tokamak Reactor Workshop, Phase 2A, Part III, EUR-FU-BRU/XII-139/88/EDV1, Commission of the European Communities (1988).
   Google Scholar
• M. F. STAMP et al., “Impurity Influx Behaviour in JET,” J. Nucl. Mater., 145, 236 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. PITCHER et al., “An Experimental Investigation of Chemical Sputtering of Carbon in a Tokamak Discharge,” Nucl. Fusion, 26, 1641 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. SAMM et al., “Plasma Edge Research on TEXTOR,” Proc. 14th European Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madrid, Spain, June 22-26, 1987; Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion, 29, 1321 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• J. ROTH, “Sputtering and Radiation Enhanced Sublimation of Carbon,” Physics of Plasma-Wall Interactions in Controlled Fusion, D. E. POST and R. BEHRISCH, Eds., Plenum Press, New York (1986).
   Google Scholar
• J. N. BROOKS, “Two-Dimensional Impurity Transport Calculations for a High Recycling Divertor,” J. Nucl. Mater., 147, 837 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. J. GOEDHEER, “Composition of the Neutral Particle Flux to the First Wall of INTOR,” in European Contributions to the International Tokamak Reactor Workshop, Phase 2A, Part II, EUR-FU-BRU/XII-268/85/EDV1, Vol. II, p. III-107, Commission of the European Communities (1985).
   Google Scholar
• B. LIBIN, J-L. BOUTARD, and M. CHAZALON, “Testing of the Nuclear In-Vessel Components: Requirements and Program,” Fusion Technol., 14, 187 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Tokamak Workshop, “Report on Phase Zero,” STI/PUB/556, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1980).
   Google Scholar
• F. ENGELMANN, “Startup and Operation Scenarios of NET,” Proc. 7th Course/Workshop Tokamak Startup: Problems and Scenarios Related to the Transient Phases of a Thermonuclear Fusion Reactor, Erice, Italy, p. 95 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• M. C. ZARNSTORFF et al., “Driven Currents in TFTR,” Proc. 14th European Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madrid, Spain, June 22-26, 1987, Part I, p. 144.
   Google Scholar
• E. SALPIETRO, R. ALBANESE, E. COCCORESE, R. MARTONE, N. MITCHELL, and G. RUBINACCI, “Next European Torus Operation Cycle,” Fusion Technol., 14, 145 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. NOCENTINI, “Transformer Recharging by Lower Hybrid Waves at High Temperatures in Tokamaks,” Proc. 14th European Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madrid, Spain, June 22-26, 1987, Part III, p. 898.
   Google Scholar
• J-G. WÉGROWE, F. ENGELMANN, F. FARFAL-LETTI-CASALI, and F. MOONS, “Heating and Current Drive Systems,” Fusion Technol., 14, 165 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. KOCH and D. Van EESTER, “Ion Cyclotron Heating of NET: Review of Scenarios and Antenna Design,” Next European Torus Report, EUR/FU/XII-80/88/78, Commission of the European Communities (1988).
   Google Scholar
• M. COX et al., “Negative Ion Beams for Heating and Current Drive in NET,” Next European Torus Report, EUR/FU/XII-80/88/79, Commission of the European Communities (1988).
   Google Scholar
• M. CHAZALON, P. DINNER, N. MITCHELL, and E. SALPIETRO, “Next European Torus General Description and Layout,” Fusion Technol., 14, 49 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report on the IAEA INTOR-Related Specialists’ Mtg. Confinement in Tokamaks with Intense Heating, Kyoto, Japan, November 21-22, 1986; see “Fusion Reactor Critical Issues,” Technical Document IAEA-TECDOC-441, p. 87, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Y. SHIMOMURA et al., “Empirical Scaling of Energy Confinement Time of L-Mode and Optimized Mode and Some Consideration of Reactor Core Plasma in Tokamak,” JAERI-M-87/080, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (Jun. 1987).
   Google Scholar