Fuel Cycle Options for the Production and Utilization of Denatured Plutonium

REFERENCES

• G. KESSLER, “Plutonium Denaturing by 238Pu,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 155, 53 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. KESSLER et al., “Moderne Strategien zur Beseitigung von Plutonium,” Atomwirtsch., 46, 132 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• G. KESSLER, “Requirements for Nuclear Energy in the 21st Century,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 40, 3–4, 309 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. LAIDLER et al., “Development of Pyro-Processing Technology,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 31, 1–2, 131 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• O. CONOCAR, N. DOUYERE, J.-P. GLATZ, J. LACQUEMENT, R. MALMBECK, and J. SERP, “Promising Pyrochemical Actinides/Lanthanides Separation Process Using Aluminum,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 153, 253 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. HERBIG et al., “Vibrocompacted Fuel for the Liquid Metal Reactor BOR 60,” J. Nucl. Mater., 204, 93 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “INFCE—Summary Volume and Reports of INFCE Working Groups,” International Atomic Energy Agency (1980).
   Google Scholar
• C. D. HEISING-GOODMAN, “An Evaluation of the Plutonium Denaturing Concept as an Effective Safeguards Method,” Nucl. Technol., 50, 242 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. O. CAMPBELL and E. M. GIFT, “Proliferation Resistant Nuclear Fuel Cycles,” ORNL/TM-6392, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1978).
   Google Scholar
• J. V. MASSEY and A. SCHNEIDER, “The Role of Plutonium-238 in Nuclear Fuel Cycles,” Nucl. Technol., 56, 55 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. RONEN and Y. KIMHI, “A ‘Nonproliferating’ Nuclear Fuel for Light Water Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 96, 133 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. SHWAGERAUS, P. HEJZLAR, and M. S. KAZIMI, “Use of Thorium for Transmutation of Plutonium and Minor Actinides in PWRs,” Nucl. Technol., 147, 53 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. SAITO et al., “Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems for Inherently Protected Plutonium Production,” Proc. Int. Conf. Innovative Technologies for Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Nuclear Power, Vienna, Austria, June 23–26, 2003, International Atomic Energy Agency (2003).
   Google Scholar
• M. SAITO, “Advanced Core Concepts with Enhanced Proliferation Resistance by Transmutation of Minor Actinides,” Proc. Int. Conf. Sustainable Nuclear Energy Systems for Future Generation (GLOBAL 2005), Tsukuba, Japan, October 9–13, 2005, Paper 172, p. 533, Atomic Energy Society of Japan (2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. SAITO, “The Technical Barriers for Proliferation Resistance in Nuclear Material Management,” Proc. Technical Mtg. Fissile Material Management Strategies for Sustainable Nuclear Energy, Vienna, Austria, September 12–15, 2005, International Atomic Energy Agency (2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. OSAKA et al., “Aspects of 238Pu Production in the Experimental Fast Reactor JOYO,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 32, 1023 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• “The Isotope Correlation Experiment ICE,” ESARDA2/81, EUR 7766EN, KFK 3337, L. KOCH and S. SCHOOF, Eds., Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1981).
   Google Scholar
• J. BOUCHARD, “The Enclosed Fuel Cycle and Nonproliferation Issues,” Proc. Int. Conf. Sustainable Nuclear Energy Systems for Future Generation (GLOBAL 2005), Tsukuba, Japan, October 9–13, 2005, Atomic Energy Society of Japan (2005).
   Google Scholar
• E. M. BLAKE, “GNEP Rollout Means Big Jump for Fuel Cycle,” Nucl. News, 49, 3, 64 (2006); see also “Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative,” available on the Internet at www.ne.anl.gov/research.
   Google Scholar
• C. H.M. BROEDERS, “Entwicklungsarbeiten fuer die neutronenphysikalische Auslegung von Fortschrittlichen Druckwasserreaktoren (FDWR) mit kompakten Dreiecksgittern in hexagonalen Brennelementen,” PhD Thesis, TU Karlsruhe and KfK 5072 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• C. H. M. BROEDERS et al., “Modular Program System for Nuclear Reactor Analysis, Status and Results of Selected Applications,” presented at Jahrestagung Kerntechnik, Düsseldorf, Germany, May 25–27, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. ASKEW et al., “A General Description of the Lattice Code WIMS,” J. Br. Nucl. Energy Soc., 5, 564 (1966).
   Google Scholar
• D. WOLL, “Aufbau der Gruppenkonstantenbibliothek GRUBA und ihre Verwaltung durch das Programmsystem GRUMA,” KFK 3745, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1984).
   Google Scholar
• C. H.M. BROEDERS, “Neutronic Investigations of an Equilibrium Core for a Tight Lattice Light Water Reactor,” Kerntechnik, 57, 1, 23 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• L. SEND, “Investigations for Fuel Recycling in LWRs,” Diploma Thesis, TU Karlsruhe; available on the Internet at http://inrwww.fzk.de (October 2005).
   Google Scholar
• J. L. KLOOSTERMAN and E. E. BENDE, “Plutonium Recycling in Pressurized Water Reactors: Influence of the Moderator-to-Fuel Ratio,” Nucl. Technol., 130, 227 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. DRISCOLL et al., The Linear Reactivity Model for Nuclear Fuel Management, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois (1992).
   Google Scholar
• C. H. M. BROEDERS, “Investigations Related to the Build-Up of Transurania in Pressurized Water Reactors,” FZKA 5784, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1996).
   Google Scholar
• H. SAGARA et al., “Denaturing of Plutonium by Transmutation of Minor Actinides for Enhancement of Proliferation Resistance,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 42, 2, 161 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. ANIEL-BUCHHEIT, A. PUILL, R. SANCHEZ, and M. COSTE, “Plutonium Recycling in a Full-MOX 900-MW(electric) PWR: Physical Analysis of Accident Behaviors,” Nucl. Technol., 128, 245 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. TOMMASI, M. DELPECH, J.-P. GROUILLER, and A. ZAETTA, “Long-Lived Waste Transmutation in Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 111, 133 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. BARBRAULT, “A Plutonium-Fueled High-Moderated Pressurized Water Reactor for the Next Century,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 122, 240 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. OLDEKOP, Druckwasserreaktoren, Karl Thiemig Verlag, München (1982).
   Google Scholar
• F. J. MÜLLER, “Beitrag zur Theorie der Mehrkomponenten-Isotopentrennung und deren Anwendung insbesondere auf die Untersuchung des 236U-Aufbaus im Brennstoffkreislauf,” Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, Broschüre 1540 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• H. O. HOPPE, Urenco Personal Communication (Oct. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• K. FUKUDA, “IAEA Scenario of MA Transmutation in LWR,” presented at COES-INES Topl. Forum Protected Plutonium Utilization for Peace and Sustainable Prosperity, Tokyo, Japan, March 1–4, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• M. SALVATORES, “Scenarios Using P/T and Major Challenges,” presented at Workshop on Future Nuclear Systems and Fuel Cycles, Karlsruhe, Germany, September 1–2, 2005, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (2005).
   Google Scholar
• D. C. WADE and R. N. HILL, “The Design Rationale for the IFR,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 31, 1–2, 13 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• M. SAITO, “Multicomponent Self-Consistent Nuclear Energy System: Protected Plutonium Production by Transmutation of Minor Actinides,” presented at Workshop on Future Nuclear Systems and Fuel Cycles, Karlsruhe, Germany, Sept. 1–2, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• R. A. WIGELAND et al., “Waste Management Aspects of Various Fuel Cycle Options,” presented at Technical Mtg. on Fissile Material Management Strategies for Sustainable Nuclear Energy, Vienna, Austria, September 12–15, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• P. J. FINCK, “Answering Questions on Reprocessing, Explaining the Closed Fuel Cycle,” Nucl. News, 48, 10, 10 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• J. KRELLMANN, “Plutonium Processing at the Siemens Hanau Fuel Fabrication Plant,” Nucl. Technol., 102, 18 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. W. BENEDICT, “Status of Reprocessing Development,” presented at Nuclear Fuel Cycle Workshop, Karlsruhe, Germany, September 1–3, 2005, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (2005).
   Google Scholar
• E. PICARD, J. NOIROT, R. L. MOSS, H. PLITZ, K. RICHTER, and J. ROUAULT, “First In-Pile Experimental Results of High-Plutonium Content Oxide Fuel for Plutonium Burning in Fast Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 129, 1 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• R. N. HILL, D. C. WADE, J. R. LIAW, and E. K. FUJITA, “Physics Studies of Weapons Plutonium Disposition in the Integral Fast Reactor Closed Fuel Cycle,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 121, 17 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. LANGUILLE et al., “CAPRA Core Studies, The Oxide Reference Option,” Proc. Int. Conf. Sustainable Nuclear Energy Systems for Future Generation (GLOBAL 1995), Versailles, France, September 11–14, 1995, European Nuclear Society (1995).
   Google Scholar
• N. MESSAOUDI and J. TOMMASI, “Fast Burner Reactor Devoted to Minor Actinide Incineration,” Nucl. Technol., 137, 84, (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. TOMMASI et al., “A Coherent Strategy for Plutonium and Actinide Recycling,” Trans. Int. Nucl. Congress—Atoms for Energy (European Nuclear Conference 1994), October 2–6, 1994, Lyon, France, European Nuclear Society (1994).
   Google Scholar
• U. WEHMANN, H. KINJO, and T. KAGEYAMA, “Studies on Plutonium Burning in the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor Monju,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 140, 205 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Status of Liquid Metal Cooled Fast Breeder Reactors,” Technical Report Series 246, International Atomic Energy Agency (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium: Reactor-Related Options, National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (1995).
   Google Scholar
• S. FETTER et al., “Detecting Nuclear Warheads,” Sci. Global Security, 1, 225 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. SOLARZ, “A Physics Overview of AVLIS,” UCID-20343, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1985).
   Google Scholar
• D. LOAIZA, R. SANCHEZ, D. HAYES, and C. CAPPIELLO, “Results and Analysis of the Spherical 237Np Critical Experiment Surrounded by Highly Enriched Uranium Hemispherical Shells,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 152, 65 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. LOAIZA and W. STRATTON, “Criticality Data for Spherical 235U, 239Pu and 237Np Systems Reflector-Moderated by Low Capturing-Moderator Materials,” Nucl. Technol., 146, 143 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. DIAZ et al., “Critical Mass Calculations for 241Am, Am-242m and 243Am,” presented at 7th Int. Conf. Nuclear Criticality Safety (ICNC 2003), Tokaimura, Japan, October 20–24, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• D. ALBRIGHT and L. BARBOUR, “Troubles Tomorrow? Separated Neptunium-237 and Americium,” The Challenges of Fissile Materials, Chap. 5, D. ALBRIGHT and K. O’NEILL, Eds., Institute for Science and International Security Press, Washington, D.C. (1999).
   Google Scholar
• W. SEIFRITZ, Nukleare Sprengkörper—Bedrohung oder Energieversorgung für die Menschheit?, Karl Thiemig Verlag, München (1983).
   Google Scholar
• A. DEVOLPI, Proliferation, Plutonium and Policy/Institutional and Technological Impediments to Nuclear Weapons Propagation, Pergamon Press, New York (1979).
   Google Scholar
• A. MORGENSTERN et al., “Analysis of 237Np in Spent Fuel Solutions,” Radiochim. Acta, 90, 389 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• A. GALPERIN et al., “A Pressurized Water Reactor Plutonium Incinerator Based on Thorium Fuel and Seed-Blanket Assembly Geometry,” Nucl. Technol., 132, 214 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar