Using the Cartesian Discrete Ordinates Code DORT for Assembly-Level Calculations

REFERENCES

• A. HÉBERT, Applied Reactor Physics, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal (2006).
   Google Scholar
• E. E. LEWIS and W. F. MILLER, Jr., Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois (1993).
   Google Scholar
• R. STAMMLER, “HELIOS Methods, Proprietary Studsvik Scandpower Report, Distributed Together with the HELIOS Code,” Studsvik Scandpower (2000).
   Google Scholar
• G. MARLEAU, “DRAGON Theory Manual Part 1: Collision Probability Calculations,” Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal (Oct. 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Y. HAN et al., “Effect of Void Dependent Reactivity Modeling Bias on BWR Axial Power Tilt,” Proc. PHYSOR 2010— Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9–14, 2010, American Nuclear Society (2010).
   Google Scholar
• R. LE TELLIER and A. HÉBERT, “An Improved Algebraic Collapsing Acceleration with General Boundary Conditions for the Characteristics Method,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 156, 121 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• T. POSTMA and J. VUJIC, “The Method of Characteristics in General Geometry with Anisotropic Scattering,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computation, Reactor Physics and Environmental Analysis in Nuclear Applications, Madrid, Spain, September 27–30, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• R. LE TELLIER and A. HÉBERT, “A PWR Assembly Computational Scheme Based on the DRAGON V4 Lattice Code,” Proc. Joint Int. Topl. Mtg. Mathematics and Computation and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M&C + SNA 2007), Monterey, California, April 15–19, 2007, American Nuclear Society (2007).
   Google Scholar
• M. D. DeHART, R. E. PEVEY, and T. A. PARISH, “An Extended Step Characteristic Method for Solving the Transport Equation in General Geometries,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 118, 79 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. D. DeHART, “Lattice Physics Capabilities of the SCALE Code System Using TRITON,” Proc. PHYSOR-2006 Topl. Mtg. Reactor Physics: Advances in Nuclear Analysis and Simulation, Vancouver, Canada, September 10–14, 2006, American Nuclear Society (2006).
   Google Scholar
• A. PAUTZ et al., “Fuel Assembly Calculations Using the Method of Discrete Ordinates,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 149, 197 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Y. AZMY, J. C. GEHIN, and R. ORSI, “DORT Solutions to the Two-Dimensional C5G7MOX Benchmark Problem,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 45, 215 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Benchmark on Deterministic Transport Calculations Without Spatial Approximation,” NEA/NSC/DOC(2005) 16, Nuclear Energy Agency (2005).
   Google Scholar
• “RSICC Computer Code Collection DOORS3.2a,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oct. 2003).
   Google Scholar
• G. MARLEAU, A. HÉBERT, and R. ROY, “A User Guide for DRAGON 3.06,” Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal (Mar. 2008).
   Google Scholar
• G. MARLEAU, A. HÉBERT, and R. ROY, “A User Guide for DRAGON Version 4,” Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal (Aug. 2008).
   Google Scholar
• X5 MONTE CARLO TEAM, “MCNP—AGeneral Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5” (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “The JEFF-2.2 Nuclear Data Library,” Nuclear Energy Agency (2000).
   Google Scholar
• J. C. WAGNER et al., “MCNP: Multi-Group/Adjoint Capabilities,” LA-12704, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Apr. 1994).
   Google Scholar
• V. XULUBANA et al., “Accuracy Evaluation of Pin Exposure Calculations in Current LWR Core Design Codes,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 93, 664 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• E. E. LEWIS et al., “Benchmark Specification for Deterministic 2-D/3-D MOX Fuel Assembly Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenisation,” NEA/NSC/DOC(2001)4, Nuclear Energy Agency (2003).
   Google Scholar
• B. MERVIN et al., “Under-Prediction of Localized Tally Uncertainties in Monte Carlo Eigenvalue Calculations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 104, 329 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• R. ORSI, “BOT3PVersion 5.0: APre/Post-Processor System for Transport Analysis” (Apr. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• N. KRIANGCHAIPORN, “Transport Model Based on 3-D Cross-Section Generation for TRIGA Core Analysis,” PhD Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University (2006).
   Google Scholar
• R. SANCHEZ and L. MAO, “New Developments in the Interface-Current Module TDT,” Proc. Joint Int. Mtg. Mathematics and Computation and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications, Saratoga Springs, New York, October 6–10, 1997, American Nuclear Society (1997).
   Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO et al., “Benchmark Problem Suite for Reactor Physics Study of LWR Next Generation Fuels,” Nucl. Sci. Technol., 39, 900 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• G. F. KNOLL, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 4th ed., Wiley Interscience (2010).
   Google Scholar