A Point-Kinetics Approach to Sensitivity Study of Fast Reactor Dynamic Behavior and Delayed Neutron Spectra

References

• R. B. ROBERTS, R. C. MEYER, and P. WANG, “Further Observations on the Splitting of Uranium and Thorium,” Phys. Rev., 55, 510 (1939);
   Google Scholar
  see also “The Delayed Neutron Emission Which Accompanies Fission of Uranium and Thorium,” Phys. Rev., 55, 664 (1939).
   Google Scholar
• Y. B. ZELDOVICH and Y. B. KHARITON, Zh. eksp. teor. Fiz., 10, 477 (1940);
   Google Scholar
  see also E. FERMI, Letter to S. K. ALLISON (Oct. 1941).
   Google Scholar
• S. DAS, “The Importance of Delayed Neutrons in Nuclear Research —A Review,” Progr. Nucl. Energy, 28, 3, 209 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• G. D. SPRIGGS, “A Measurement of the Effective Delayed Neutron Fraction of the Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company Slab Tank Assembly Using Rossi-α Techniques,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 115, 76 (1993) (and references therein).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. R. KEEPIN, Physics of Nuclear Kinetics, p. 172, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts (1965).
   Google Scholar
• S. YIFTAH and D. SAPHIER, “The Importance of Exact Delayed Neutron Data in Fast Reactor Dynamic Behavior,” Proc. Panel Delayed Fission Neutrons, Vienna, April 24–27, 1967, STI/PUB/176, p. 23, International Atomic Energy Agency (1968).
   Google Scholar
• R. J. TUTTLE, “Delayed-Neutron Data for Reactor-Physics Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 56, 37 (1975).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. SAPHIER, D. ILBERG, S. SHALEV, and S. YIFTAH, “Evaluated Delayed Neutron Spectra and Their Importance in Reactor Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 62, 660 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. STEVENSON, “Delayed Neutron Parameter Requirements for Reactor Physics Purposes,” Proc. Specialists’ Mtg. Delayed Neutron Properties, University of Birmingham, England, September 15–19, 1986, p. 1, University of Birmingham (1987).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. MILLS, “Review of Fission Product Yields and Delayed Neutron Data for the Actinides,” NEANDC-300-U, Nuclear Energy Agency (July 1990).
   Google Scholar
• J. L. ROWLANDS and M. SALVATORES, “Fission Product Data Needs for Reactor Applications,” Proc. Specialists’ Mtg. Fission Product Nuclear Data, Tokai, Japan, May 25–27, 1992, NEA/NSC/DOC(92)9, p. 12, Nuclear Energy Agency (1992).
   Google Scholar
• G. R. KEEPIN, T. F. WIMETT, and R. K. ZEIGLER, “Delayed Neutrons from Fissionable Isotopes of Uranium, Plutonium and Thorium,” Phys. Rev., 107, 1044 (1957) and J. Nucl. Energy, 6, 1 (1957).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. C. BRADY and T. R. ENGLAND, “Delayed Neutron Data and Group Parameters for 43 Fissioning Systems,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 103, 129 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. G. CACUCI, in The Forward and the Adjoint Methods of Sensitivity Analysis, p. 71, Y. RONEN, Ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida (1988).
   Google Scholar
• H. LEVINE and J. SCHWINGER, “On the Theory of Diffraction by an Aperture in an Infinite Plane Screen-II,” Phys. Rev., 75, 9, 1423 (1949).
   Google Scholar
• L. N. USACHEV, “Perturbation Theory for the Breeding Ratio and for Other Number Ratios Pertaining to Various Reactor Processes,” J. Nucl. Energy (Parts A/B), 18, 571 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. STACEY, Jr., Variational Methods in Nuclear Reactor Physics, Academic Press, Inc., New York (1974).
   Google Scholar
• C. R. WEISBIN, E. M. OBLOW, J. H. MARABLE, R. W. PEELLE, and J. L. LUCIUS, “Application of Sensitivity and Uncertainty Methodology to Fast Reactor Integral Experiment Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 66, 307 (1978).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. L. WILLIAMS, “Development of Depletion Perturbation Theory for Coupled Neutron/Nuclide Fields,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 70, 20 (1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. F. WEBER and E. M. OBLOW, “Sensitivity Theory Applied to a Transient Thermal-Hydraulics Problem,” ORNL/TM-6900, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1979).
   Google Scholar
• D. G. CACUCI, “Sensitivity Theory for Nonlinear Systems,” J. Math. Phys., 22, 12, 2794 and 2803 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. OBLOW, F. G. PIN, and R. Q. WRIGHT, “Sensitivity Analysis Using Computer Calculus: A Nuclear Waste Isolation Application,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 94, 46 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. GANDINI, in Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 19, p. 205, J. LEWINS and M. BECKER, Eds., Plenum Press, New York (1987).
   Google Scholar
• J. PORTA, J. Y. DORIATH, A. MOURGUES, M. NOBILE, A. VALLEE, and G. B. BRUNA, “Sensitivity Studies on High-Conversion Power Reactors, via Perturbation Methods and Information Conditioning,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 95, 266 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIZWAN-UDDIN and J. J. DORNING, “A Chaotic Attractor in a Periodically Forced Two-Phase Flow System,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 100, 393 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI, M. SALVATORES, and R. N. HILL, “Sensitivity, Uncertainty Assessment, and Target Accuracies Related to Radiotoxicity Evaluation,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 117, 239 (1994) (and references therein).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. G. CACUCI, C. F. WEBER, E. M. OBLOW, and J. H. MARABLE, “Sensitivity Theory for General Systems of Nonlinear Equations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 75, 88 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. M. FLETT, Differential Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980).
   Google Scholar
• P. M. MORSE and H. FESHBACH, in Methods of Theoretical Physics, pp. 528, 584, 645, 870, 874, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1953).
   Google Scholar
• D. G. CACUCI, “Global Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 104, 78 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. W. DECKER and H. B. KELLER, “Path Following Near Bifurcation,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. XXXIV, p. 149, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1981).
   Google Scholar
• D. SAPHIER, D. ILBERG, and S. YIFTAH, “Sensitivity of LMFBR Calculations to Basic Data Sources,” Advanced Reactors: Physics, Design and Economics, p. 592, Pergamon Press, New York (1975).
   Google Scholar
• D. SAPHIER, “Optimal Source Projection Method to Accelerate Space-Time-Dependent Calculations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 16, 300 (1973).
   Google Scholar
• R. BATCHELOR and H. R. McK. HYDER, “The Energy of Delayed Neutrons from Fission,” J. Nucl. Energy, 3, 7 (1956).
   Google Scholar
• G. FIEG, “Measurements of Delayed Fission Neutron Spectra of U-235, U-238 and Pu-239 with Proton Recoil Proportional Counters,” J. Nucl. Energy, 26, 585 (1972).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SHALEV and J. M. CUTTLER, “The Energy Distribution of Delayed Fission Neutrons,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 51, 52 (1973).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. A. SHOBER, T. A. DALY, and D. R. FERGUSSON, “FX2-TH: A Two-Dimensional Nuclear Reactor Kinetics Code with Thermal-Hydraulic Feedback,” ANL-78-97, Argonne National Laboratory (1978).
   Google Scholar
• D. SAPHIER and S. YIFTAH, “The Effect of Errors in the Delayed Neutron Data on Fast Reactor Static and Dynamic Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 42, 272 (1970).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. BURGY, L. A. PARDUE, H. B. WILLARD, and E. O. WOLLAN, “Energies of the Delayed Neutrons from U-235 Fission Products,” MDDC-16, Manhattan District Declassified Documents (June 1946); Abstract in Phys. Rev., 70, 104 (1946).
   Google Scholar
• T. W. BONNER, S. J. BEME, Jr., and J. E. EVANS, “Energy of the Delayed Neutrons from the Fission of U-235,” Phys. Rev., 101, 1514 (1956).
   Google Scholar
• R. J. ONEGA and R. J. FLORIAN, “The Implication of Sensitivity Analysis on the Safety of Delayed Neutron Parameters for Fast Breeder Reactors,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 10, 9, 477 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• S. DAS and J. WALKER, “The Sensitivity of Fast Reactor Kinetic Behavior to Variations in Delayed Neutron Energy Spectra,” Nucl. Energy, 26, 1, 47 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• D. A. MENELEY, K. O. OTT, and E. S. WIENER, “Fast-Reactor Kinetics-The QXl Code,” ANL-7769, Argonne National Laboratory (Mar. 1971).
   Google Scholar
• S. DAS, “The Concept of a Sub-Prompt-Critical Nuclear Reactor and Its Applications to the Solution of Safety-Related Neutronic Problems in Reactor Kinetics,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 28, 7, 1241 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• P. A. SECKER, Jr., “Numerical Integration of Dynamic Nuclear Systems Equations by Optimum Integrating Factors,” LA-4252, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (1969).
   Google Scholar
• O. P. SINGH and R. S. SINGH, “Analysis of Design Basis Accident for PFBR Carbide Core,” PFBR/01170/2, Reactor Research Centre, Kalpakkam, India (June 1982).
   Google Scholar