Modeling and SISO/MIMO Control with an Inverse Nyquist Array and Stability Analysis for Load-Follow Operation of PWR Core Without Boron

REFERENCES

• C. E. Meyer et al., “Improved Load Follow Strategy for Return-to-Power Capability”, Nucl. Technol, 41, 1, 27 (1978); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT78-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gautier, “Grey Mode Operation Helps French PWRs to Load Follow”, Nucl. Eng. Int, 30, 364, 19 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. R. Chari et al., “System 80 + ™ Standard Plant Design Meeting Load Follow Requirements for the Future”, Proc. 11th Bi-Annual Pacific Basin Nucl. Conf, Banff, Canada, May 3–7, 1997, p. 1177.
   Google Scholar
• M. Onoue et al., “Application of MSHIM Core Control Strategy for Westinghouse AP1000 Nuclear Power Plant”, Proc. Int. Conf. Global Environment and Advanced Nuclear Power Plants (GENES4/ANP2003), Kyoto, Japan, September 15–19, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• K. J. Drudy et al., “Robustness of the MSIHM Operation and Control Strategy in the AP1000 Design”, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering, Brussels, Belgium, July 12–16, 2009, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• P. A. Yu et al., Thermal Analysis ofNuclear Reactors, Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, Shanghai, China (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. M. Zhang et al., Control of Nuclear Reactors, Atomic Energy Press, Beijing, China (2010).
   Google Scholar
• S. G. Chi and N. Z. Cho, “H∞ Control Theory Applied to Xenon Control for Load-Following Operation of a Nuclear Reactor”, Nucl. Technol, 137, 2, 127 (2002); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT00-31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Dong et al., “Output-Feedback Load-Following Control of Nuclear Reactors Based on a Dissipative High Gain Filter”, Nucl. Eng. Des, 241, 4783 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Busi et al., “Multivariable Feedback Control Applications in Combustion Engineering High Power Density Pressurized Water Reactors”, Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Advances in Mathematical Methods for the Solution of Nuclear Engineering Problems, Munich, Germany, 1981, p. 316.
   Google Scholar
• H. Ukai and T. Iwazumi, “A New Approach to Control of Xenon Spatial Oscillation During Load Follow Operation via Robust Servo Systems”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci, 41, 6, 2675 (1994); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/23.340634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lin and C. M. Shen, “Neurocontrol of Pressurized Water Reactors in Load-Follow Operations”, Nucl. Technol, 132, 3, 389 (2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT00-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Eliasi et al., “Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Nuclear Power Plants in Load Following Operations with Bounded Xenon Oscillations”, Nucl. Eng. Des, 241, 533 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. A. Johansen and B. A. Foss, “Multiple Model Approaches to Modelling and Control”, Int. J. Control, 72, 7/8, 575 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. H. Rosenbrock, Computer-Aided Control System Design, Academic Press, New York (1974).
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Hawkins, “Pseudo-Diagonalisation and the Inverse Nyquist Array Method”, Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng, 119, 3, 337 (1972); http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/piee.1972.0079.
   Google Scholar
• A. MacFarlane and B. Kouvaritakis, Complex Variable Methods for Linear Multivariable Feedback Systems, Taylor and Francis, London (1980).
   Google Scholar
• J. Edmunds, “Input and Output Scaling and Reordering for Diagonal Dominance and Block Diagonal Dominance”, IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl, 145, 6, 523 (1998); http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-cta:19982372.
   Google Scholar
• G. F. Bryant and L. F. Yeung, Multivariable Control System Design Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996).
   Google Scholar
• S. S. Chughtai and N. Munro, “Diagonal Dominance Using LMIs”, IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl, 151, 2, 225 (2004); http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-cta:20040202.
   Google Scholar
• F. Z. Bai and G. Z. Pang, Multivariable Frequency Domain Theory and Design Techniques, National Defence Industry Press, Beijing, China (1988).
   Google Scholar
• A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, pp. 137–178, Springer, New York (1995).
   Google Scholar
• G. R. Duan, Linear System Theory, pp. 157–160, Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin, China (2004).
   Google Scholar
• B. Liu and W. S. Tang, Modern Control Theory, pp. 157–186, China Machine Press, Beijing, China (2007).
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Schultz, Control ofNuclear Reactors and Power Plants, McGraw-Hill, New York (1961).
   Google Scholar
• T. W. Kerlin et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Dynamic Analysis of the H. B. Robinson Nuclear Plant”, Nucl. Technol, 30, 299 (1978); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT76-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Edwards, K. Y. Lee, and M. A. Schultz, “State Feedback Assisted Classical Control: An Incremental Approach to Control Modernization of Existing and Future Nuclear Reactors and Power Plants”, Nucl. Technol, 92, 2, 167 (1990); http://dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT90-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ben-Abdennour et al., “LQG/LTR Robust Control of Nuclear Reactors with Improved Temperature Performance”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci, 39, 6, 2286 (1992); http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/23.211438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directory of Nuclear Reactors, Vol. IX, pp. 27–34, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (1971).
   Google Scholar
• L. F. Yeung and G. F. Bryant, “New Dominance Concepts for Multivariable Control Systems Design”, Int. J. Control, 55, 4, 969 (1992); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207179208934267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Yu, Robust Control—Linear Matrix Inequalities Method, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China (2002).
   Google Scholar
• P. Gahinet et al., “LMI Control Toolbox User’s Guide”, The Math Works, Inc. (1995).
   Google Scholar