Effects of Nuclear Data Uncertainties on the NEA/OECD PWR MOX/UO₂ Core Rod Ejection Benchmark

REFERENCES

• “Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design-Specific Safety Requirements,” NS-R-3, International Atomic Energy Agency (2012).
   Google Scholar
• K. Ivanov, M. Avramova, S. Kamerow, I. Kodeli, E. Sartori, E. Ivanov, and O. Cabellos, “Benchmark for Uncertainty Analysis in Modeling (UAM) for Design, Operation, and Safety Analysis of LWRs,” NEA/NSC/DOC (2012) 10, Nuclear Energy Agency (2012).
   Google Scholar
• M. Klein, L. Gallner, B. Krzykacz-Hausmann, A. Pautz, and W. Zwermann, “Influence of Nuclear Data Uncertainties on Reactor Core Calculations”, Kerntechnik, 2011/03, 174 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• T. Kozlowski and T. J. Downar, “PWR MOX/UO2 Core Transient Benchmark Final Report,” NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)20, Nuclear Energy Agency (2007).
   Google Scholar
• B. Krzykacz, E. Hofer, M. Kloos, “A Software System for Probabilistic Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Results from Computer Models”, Proc. Int. Conf. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM-II), San Diego, California (1994).
   Google Scholar
• B. T. Rearden, “TSUNAMI Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Capabilities in SCALE 5.1”, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 97, 604 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• H. S. Abdel-Khalik, P. J. Turinsky, and M. A. See Jes, “Efficient Subspace Methods-Based Algorithms for Performing Sensitivity, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Simulation of Large-Scale Computational Models”, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 159, 256 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kodeli, “Multidimensional Deterministic Nuclear Data Sensitivity and Uncertainty Code System: Method and Application”, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 138, 45 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Langenbuch and K. Velkov, “Overview on the Development and Application of the Coupled Code System ATHLET - QUABBOX/CUBBOX”, Proc. Mathematics and Computation, Supercomputing, Reactor Physics and Nuclear and Biological Applications, Avignon, France, September 12–15, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• “SCALE: A Modular Code System for Performing Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation, Version 6,” ORNL/TM-2005/39, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. L. Williams and B. T. Rearden, “SCALE-6 Sensitivity/Uncertainty Methods and Covariance Data”, Nucl. Data Sheets, 109, 12, 2796 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. Williams, M. Jessee, H. Smith, and D. Wiarda, “Statistical Uncertainty Analysis Methodology for UAM Exercise I-3,” OECD-NEA Databank package NEA-1769 ZZ-UAM-LWR, Nuclear Energy Agency: http://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/abstract/detail/NEA-1769/.
   Google Scholar
• H. Ikeda and T. Takeda, “Development and Verification of an Efficient Spatial Neutron Kinetics Method for Reactivity-Initiated Event Analyses”, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 38, 492 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Yoo, J. M. Noh, and H. K. Joo, “Development of MOX Fueled Core Analysis Code Based on the Refined Analytic Function Expansion Nodal Method”, Proc. Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Yongpyong, Korea, October 2003.
   Google Scholar
• H. C. Lee, J. W. Yoo, J. M. Noh, and H. K. Joo, “Benchmark Analysis of the NUREC Code with OECD/NEA and U.S. Nrc PWR MOX/UO2 Control Rod Ejection Problem”, Proc. Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Yongpyong, Korea, October 2004.
   Google Scholar
• T. J. Downar et al., “PARCS: Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator”, Proc. Int. Conf. New Frontiers of Nuclear Technology: Reactor Physics, Safety and High-Performance Computing (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7-10, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• T. Nakajima et al., “Analysis of the PWRMSLB Benchmark Using the Coupled 3-D Neutronics and Thermal-Hydraulic Code SKETCH-INS/TRAC-P”, NUTHOS-6, Nara, Japan, October 4–8, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• A. Avvakumov and V. Malofeev, “Validation of an Advanced Heterogeneous Model for LWR Detailed Pin-by-Pin Calculations”, Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Nuclear Science and Technology, October 1998.
   Google Scholar
• A. Avvakumov, V. Malofeev, and V. Sidorov, “Analysis of Pin-by-Pin Effects for LWR Rod Ejection Accident,” NUREG/IA-0175, NSI RRC KI 90-12/1-3-00, IPSN/00-13, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2000).
   Google Scholar
• S. Akimushkin, A. Avvakumov, V. Malofeev, and A. Roslyakov, “Validation of a Pin-by-Pin Heterogeneous Method Against LWR MOX Benchmarks”, Proc. Int. Conf. New Frontiers of Nuclear Technology: Reactor Physics, Safety and High-Performance Computing (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7-10, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• W. A. Rhoades and R. L. Childs, “The DORT Two-Dimensional Discrete Ordinates Transport Code”, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 99, 7, 88 (May 1988).
   Google Scholar
• H. G. Joo, J. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, “Dynamic Implementation of the Equivalence Theory in the Heterogeneous Whole Core Transport Calculation”, Proc. Int. Conf. New Frontiers of Nuclear Technology: Reactor Physics, Safety and HighPerformance Computing (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, October 7-10, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• “MCNP4C2—Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System,” LANL, RSICC Computer Code Collection, CCC-701, Los Alamos National Laboratory (June 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gesellschaft für Anlagen-und Reaktorsicherheit web site: http://www.grs.de/en/computer-code-athlet.
   Google Scholar
• S. Langenbuch, W. Maurer, and W. Werner, “Coarse-Mesh Flux-Expansion Method for the Analysis of Space-Time Effects in Large Light Water Reactor Cores”, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 63, 437 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Langenbuch, W. Maurer, and W. Werner, “High-Order Schemes for Neutron Kinetics Calculations, Based on a Local Polynomial Approximation”, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 64, 508 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar