A Formal Approach for Quantitative Treatment of Modeling Uncertainties in Safety Analysis

References

• “PRA Procedures Guide,” NUREG/CR-2300, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Jan. 1983).
   Google Scholar
• “Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment of Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants,” NUREG-1150, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Dec. 1990).
   Google Scholar
• G. MORGAN and M. HENRION, Uncertainty, Cambridge University Press, New York (1992).
   Google Scholar
• G. APOSTOLAKIS, “The Concept of Probability in Safety Assessments of Technological Systems,” Science, 250, 1359 (Dec. 1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MOSLEH, C. SMIDTS, and C. LUI, “Model Uncertainty: Its Characterization and Quantification,” Proc. Workshop I: Advanced Topics in Risk and Reliability Analysis, NUREG/CP-0138, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 1994).
   Google Scholar
• G. W. PARRY, “A Discussion on the Use of Judgment in Representing Uncertainty in PRAs,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 93, 135 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• P. KAFKA and H. ADRIAN, “Modeling Uncertainties in PSA Due to Man-Machine Interface Configuration,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 38, 145 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• G. W. PARRY, “On One Type of Modeling Uncertainty in Probabilistic Risk Assessment,” Nucl. Saf, 24, 5, 624 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• T. L. CHU and G. E. APOSTOLAKIS, “Assessment of the Uncertainties Associated with the Core Uncovery Time in TMI-Type Accidents,” Reliab. Eng., 8, 23 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• N. SIU and G. APOSTOLAKIS, “Modeling the Detection Rates of Fires in Nuclear Plants: Development and Application of a Methodology for Treating Imprecise Evidence,” Risk Anal., 6, 1, 43 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• P. BAYBUTT, “Uncertainties in Modeling Physical and Chemical Phenomena in Reactor Accidents,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 93, 281 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• T. E. McKone and K. T. BOGEN, “Predicting the Uncertainties in Risk Assessment,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 10, 1674 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. SIU and G. APOSTOLAKIS, “On the Quantification of Modeling Uncertainties,” Proc. 8th Mtg. Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, SMiRT-8, Brussels, Belgium, August 8, 1985, Vol. M2 1/5, p. 375 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• A. MOSLEH and G. APOSTOLAKIS, “The Assessment of Probability Distributions from Expert Opinions with an Application to Seismic Fragility Curves,” Risk Anal., 6, 4, 447 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. IMAN and S. C. HORA, “Bayesian Methods for Modeling Recovery Times with an Application to the Loss of Off-Site Power at Nuclear Power Plants,” Risk Anal., 9, 1, 25 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• M. Khatib-Rahbar, E. CAZZOLI, M. LEE, H. NOURBAKHSH, R. DAVIS, and E. SCHMIDT, “A Probabilistic Approach to Quantifying Uncertainties in the Progression of Severe Accidents,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 102, 219 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. HELTON, “Risk, Uncertainty in Risk, and the EPA Release Limits for Radioactive Waste Disposal,” Nucl. Technol., 101, 18 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. HELTON, “Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems,” Risk Anal., 14, 483 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. O. HOFFMAN and J. S. HAMMONDS, “Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessments: The Need to Distinguish Between Uncertainty Due to Lack of Knowledge and Uncertainty Due to Variability,” Risk Anal., 14, 5, 707 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. L. MacIntosh, G. W. SUTER II, and F. O. HOFFMAN, “Uses of Probabilistic Exposure Models in Ecological Risk Assessments of Contaminated Sites,” Risk Anal., 14, 4, 405 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. GOODMAN, “On Criteria of Insignificant Difference between Two Risks,” Risk Anal., 6, 2, 235 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. IMAN and S. C. HORA, “A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis,” Risk Anal., 10, 3, 401 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. K. PARK and K. I. AHN, “A New Approach for Measuring Uncertainty Importance and Distributional Sensitivity in Probabilistic Safety Assessment,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 46, 3, 253 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Y. HSIA, J. S. CHUNG, Y. C. CHOU, R. SHERRY, J. FULFORD, and G. PARRY, “Containment Event Tree Analysis for the Kuosheng BWR6/Mark III Plant,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Methods and Applications, San Francisco, California, February 24–March 1, 1985, p. 27–1, Electric Power Research Institute (1985).
   Google Scholar
• A. TORRI, “A Consistent Probabilistic Methodology for the Seabrook Station Containment Event Tree Analysis,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Methods and Applications, San Francisco, California, February 24–March 1, 1985, p. 26–1, Electric Power Research Institute (1985).
   Google Scholar
• “Generic Framework for IPE Back-End (Level 2) Analysis Volume 2: PWR Implementation Guidelines,” NSAC/159, Electric Power Research Institute (Oct. 1991).
   Google Scholar
• A. TORRI, “Experiences and Insights from Level 2 PSAs,” Proc. Int. Mtg.: PSA/PRA and Severe Accidents ’94, Slovenia, April 17–20, 1994, p. 148, Nuclear Society of Slovenia (1994).
   Google Scholar
• H. LIM and I. CATTON, “A Method for Treating Phenomenological Uncertainty in Probabilistic Safety Analysis,” Proc. Int. Mtg.: PSA/PRA and Severe Accidents ’94, Slovenia, April 17–20, 1994, p. 398 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• M. E. Pate-Cornell, “Probability and Uncertainty inNuclear Safety Decisions,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 93, 319 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• G. W. PARRY, “On the Meaning of Probability in Probabilistic Safety Assessment,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 23, 309 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• S. KAPLAN, “Formalisms for Handling Phenomeno-logical Uncertainties: The Concepts of Probability, Frequency, Variability, and Probability of Frequency,” Nucl. Technol., 102, 137 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar