Interaction as a tool for developing a studio-based TV talk show

REFERENCES

• Bakhtin, M. (1982), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2005), Uncertain Vision. Birt, Dyke and Reinvention of the BBC, London: Random House, Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. T. (1995), Televisuality: Style, Crisis, and Authority in American Television, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. T. (2008), Production Culture. Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television, Durham, London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1984), Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., Kroon, Å. and Nylund, M. (2006), ‘Introduction’, in Ekström, M., Kroon, Å. and Nylund, M. (eds), News from the Interview Society, Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. (2002), Seeing Things. Television in the Age of Uncertainty, London: Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, R. (1995), ‘Voice as communicative action’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2:3, pp. 192–215.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, R. (1999), Toiminnan moniaäkanisyys. Tutkimus lääkärinvastaanottojen keskusteluista. [Multi-voiced activity. A study on conversations during visits to the doctor], Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987), Learning by Expanding. An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999), ‘Activity theory and individual and social transformation’, in Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R. Punamäki (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008), From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1994), Inside Prime Time, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981), Forms of Talk, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. and Clayman, S. (2002), The News Interview. Journalists and Public Figures on the Air, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, D. (2005), Communication Theory. Media, Technology and Society, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S. (1991), Film Directing Shot by Shot. Visualizing from Concept to Screen, Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Küng, L. (2008), Strategic Management in the Media. Theory to Practice, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lehko, V. (2001), The Club T, Finnish Broadcasting Company and Tarinatalo Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2005), Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere, Bristol: Intellect Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. (1994), Talk on Television, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., Toikka, K., Tuunainen, J., et al. (2008), Informaatiotekninen kumous, innovaatiopolitiikka ja luottamus. TEKESin katsaus 234, Helsinki: TEKES [Information technological revolution, innovation policy and trust. The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovations, review 234].
   Google Scholar
• Nuolijärvi, P. and Tiittula, L. (2000), Televisiokeskustelun näyttämöllä. Televisioinstitutionaalisuus suomalaisessa ja saksalaisessa keskustelukulttuurissa, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 768, Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. [The stage of televised conversation: TV institutionality in Finnish and German talk. The Finnish Litterature Society Publications 768].
   Google Scholar
• Rautkorpi, T. (2011), Televisiokeskustelu yhteiskehittelynä. Tapaustutkimus totuotannosta ja merkityksellistämisen taidosta, Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1583. Tampere: Tampere University Press. [Television conversations as co-configuration: a case study of television and the art of meaning construction].
   Google Scholar
• Sarpakunnas, T., Halonen, A. and Miettinen, O. (2008), Television kehitysnäkymät Suomessa. Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriön julkaisuja 5. Helsinki: Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriö. [The outlook for the development of television in Finland, Publications of the Ministry of Transport and Communications 5].
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. and Griffin, D. (2005), ‘Experience and method: A complex responsive processes perspective on research in organizations’, in R. D. Stacey and D. Griffin (eds), A Complexity Perspective on Researching Organizations. Taking Experience Seriously, Oxon, NY: Routledge, pp. 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1987), Plans and Situated Actions: The Problems of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. (1995), Media and Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, B. and Boynton, A. C. (1998), Invented Here. Maximizing Your Organization's Growth and Profitability. A Practical Guide to Transforming Work, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. (1996), Picture Composition for Film and Television, Oxford: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, B. (2003), Media Technology and Society. A History: From the Telegraph to the Internet, London, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar