35
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
research-article

Deconstructing organizational communication for (productive) dissensus

Pages 217-226 | Published online: 05 Sep 2013

REFERENCES

  • Bachrach, P. and Bodwinick, A. (1992), Power and Empowerment: A Radical Theory of Participatory Democracy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Barker, J. and Cheney, G. (1994), ‘The concept and practices of discipline in the contemporary organizational life’, Communication Monographs, 61 (1 ), pp. 19–43.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1998), The Consumer Society, London: Sage.
  • Bell, E. L. and Forbes, L. C. (1994 ), ‘Office folklore in the academic paperwork empire: The interstitial space of gendered (con)texts’, Text and Performance Quarterly, 14 (3 ), pp. 181–196.
  • Bryman, A. (2004), Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cascio, W. (2009 ), ‘WorkChoices defenders cling to false case for delay7, The Age, 24 February.
  • Cheney, G. (1995 ), ‘Democracy in the workplace: Theory and practice from the perspective of communication’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23 (3 ), pp. 167–200.
  • Chimezie, A. B. and Osigweh, Y. (1994 ), ‘A stakeholder perspective of employee responsibilities and rights’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 7: 4, pp. 279–96.
  • Collinson, D. (1988 ), ‘“Engineering Humor”: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations’, Organization Studies, 9 (2 ), pp. 181–99.
  • Condit, C. M. (1989 ), ‘The rhetorical limits of polysemy’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6 (2 ), pp. 103–22.
  • Condit, C. M. (1994 ), ‘Hegemony in a mass-mediated society: Concordance about reproductive technologies’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11 (3 ), pp. 205–30.
  • Conrad, C. (1988 ), ‘Work songs, hegemony, and illusions of self’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5 (3 ), pp. 179–201.
  • Dalai Lama (2009), ‘Los Angeles news’, http://cbs2.com/local/Dalai.Lama.Visit.2.994220.html. Accessed 22 May 2009.
  • Deetz, S. (1992), Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization, Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Deetz, S. (1995), Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Deetz, S. (2000), ‘Conceptual foundations’, in F. M. Jablin and L. Putnam (eds), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods, chapter 1, Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage, pp. 3–46
  • Deetz, S. and Mumby, D. K. (1985), ‘Metaphors, information, and power’, Information and Behaviour, in Ruben, B. (ed.), vol. 1, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 369–86.
  • Derrida, J. (1976), Of Grammatology, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Factiva (database), Dow Jones and Company, http://www.dowjones.com/factiva / Accessed 20 May 2009.
  • Ewing, D. (1977), Freedom Inside the Organization, New York: Dutton.
  • Fiske, J. (1986 ), ‘Television: Polysemy and popularity’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3 (4 ), pp. 391–408.
  • Frug, G. E. (1984), ‘The ideology of bureacracy in American Law7, Harvard Law Review, 97 (6 ), pp. 1277–388.
  • Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books.
  • Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks (trans. Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith), New York: International.
  • Habermas, J. (1970 ), ‘Towards a theory of communicative competence’, Inquiry, 13 (4 ), pp. 360–78.
  • Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Huspek, M. and Kendall, K. (1991 ), ‘On withholding political voice: An analysis of the political vocabulary of a “Nonpolitical” speech community’, The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77 (1 ), pp. 1–19.
  • Jermier, J. M., Knights, D. and Nord, W. R. (eds) (1994), Resistance and Power in Organizations, London: Routledge.
  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
  • Maguire, M. and Mohtar, L. F. (1994 ), ‘Performance and the celebration of a subaltern counterpublic’, Text and Performance Quarterly, 14 (3 ), pp. 238–52.
  • Markham, A. (1996 ), ‘Designing discourse: A critical analysis of strategic ambiguity and workplace control’, Management Communication Quarterly, 9 (4 ), pp. 389–421.
  • Martin, J. (1990 ), ‘Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations’, Organization Science, 1 (4 ), pp. 339–59.
  • Michels, R. (1962), Political Parties: a Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, New York: The Free Press.
  • Mumby, D. (1997 ), ‘The problem of hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for organizational communications studies’, Western Journal of Communication, 61: 4, pp. 343–75.
  • Mumby, D. and Stohl, C. (1991 ), ‘Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control’, Discourse and Society, 2 (3 ), pp. 313–32.
  • Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosen, M. (1985 ), ‘“Breakfast at Spiro’s”: Dramaturgy and dominance’, Journal of Management, 11: 2, pp. 31–48.
  • Rosen, M. (1988 ), ‘You asked for it: Christmas at the bosses’ expense’, Journal of Management Studies, 25 (5 ), pp. 463–80.
  • Sashkin, M. (1984 ), ‘Participative management is an ethical imperative’, Organizational Dynamics, pp. 5–22.
  • Simon, H. A. (1976), Administrative Behaviour, 3rd ed., New York: Free Press.
  • Strauss-Kahn, D. (2009 ), ‘Changes: Successful Partnerships for Africa’s Growth Challenge’, International Monetary Fund speech, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 10 March, http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2009/031009.htm. Accessed 22 May 2009.
  • University of Melbourne (2009), ‘Refining our strategy: A discussion paper that invites involvement and response’, http: //growingesteem.unimelb. edu.au/about/publications. Accessed 27 May 2009.

SUGGESTED CITATION

  • Lee, C. (2012), ‘Deconstructing organizational communication for (productive) dissensus’, Journal of Organizational Transformation & Social Change, 9: 3, pp. 217–226, doi: 10.1386/otsc.9.3.217_1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.