Research into, by and for design

References

• Argyris, Chris and Schon, Donald A. (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, 1st edn., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Francis (1999), Selected Philosophical Works (ed. and introduction by Rose-Mary Sargent), Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Francis (2000), The New Organon (ed. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baugh Jr., Kenneth (1990), The Methodology of Herbert Blumer: Critical Interpretation and Repair, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre (1977), Outline of the Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre (1990), The Logic of Practice, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, Bryan and Sands, ed (2002), ‘Designing Collaborative Corporate Cultures’, in Bryan Byrne and Susan E. Squires (eds), Creating Breakthrough Ideas, Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey, pp. 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, Seth and Lave, Jean (1993), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cromer, Alan (1993), Uncommon Sense: The Heretical Nature of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel (1993), ‘Editorial’, Design Studies, 14:3, pp. 226–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel (1995), ‘Editorial’, Design Studies, 16:1, pp. 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel (1999). ‘Subject: Re: Research into, for and through designs’, DRS Discussion List, 13 December. URL: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/DRS
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. Edwards (1986), Out of the Crisis: Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deming, W. Edwards (1993), The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, Christopher (1993), Research in Art and Design, RCA Research Papers, 1: 1, London: Royal College of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ken. (1997), “Design Science and Design Education.” in !The Challenge of Complexity. Peter McGrory, ed. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki, pp. 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ken. (2001), ‘Creating Design Knowledge: From Research into Practice’, in E.W.L. Norman and P.H. Roberts (eds), Design and Technology Educational Research and Development: The Emerging International Research Agenda, Loughborough: Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, pp. 31–69.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ken and Olaisen, Johan (1999), ‘Knowledge management’, in Ken Friedman and Johan Olaisen (eds), Underveis til fremtiden: Kunnskapsledelse i teori og praksis, Bergen-Sandvika: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. (1978), Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory: Theoretical Sensitivity, Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. (1992), Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence versus Forcing, Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. E. R. (1970), Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle, New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, Donald H. (1993), ‘Reframing systemic paradigms for the art of learning’, Conference of the American Society for Cybernetics on Cybernetics in the Art of Learning. Nov. 3–7, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, Ikujiro and Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael (1966), The Tacit Dimension, Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael (1974), Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, Herbert (1944), Education through Art, London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Read, Herbert (1974), Education through Art, 3rd rev. edn., New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, Donald A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, Donald A. (1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, Donald A. (1991), The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice, New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm A. (1991), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm A. and Corbin, Juliet (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm A. and Corbin, Juliet (1994), ‘Grounded theory methodology: an overview’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• UK Council for Graduate Education. (1997), Practice-Based Doctorates in the Creative and Performing Arts and Design Workshop. Coventry: UK Council for Graduate Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoonard, Will C. (1997), Working with Sensitizing Concepts: Analytical Field Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Varian, Hal R. (1997), ‘How to Build an Economic Model in Your Spare Time’, in Michael Szenberg (ed.), Passion and Craft: Economists at Work, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar