The trajectory of psychoanalysis: A prognostication

References

• Bachant, J. L. & Richards, A. D. (1993). Review essay on Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration, by S. A. Mitchell, Psychoanal. Dialogues, 3: 431–60.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. J. (1999). The Power of Feelings: Personal Meaning in Psychoanalysis, Gender, and Culture. New Haven , CT and London : Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. New York : Int. Univ. Press, 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). On the history of the psycho‐analytic movement. S.E. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. S.E. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. S.E. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. O. (1995). Countertransference: the emerging common ground. Int. J. Psychoanal., 76: 475–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1963). Topography and Systems in Psychoanalytic Theory. Psychol. Issues Mono. 10, New York : Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1976). Metapsychology is not psychology. In Psychology versus Metapsychology: Psychoanalytic Essays in Memory of George S. Klein, ed. M. M. Gill and P. S. Holzman. Psychol. Issues Mono. 36, New York : Int. Univ. Press, pp. 71–105.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1994). Psychoanalysis in Transition: A Personal View. Hillsdale , NJ and London : Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (2001). The analyst's participation: a new look. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49: 359–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge , MA and London : Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. (1999). The Elegant Universe. New York and London : W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. I. (1970). Is psychoanalysis ‘our’ science? Reflections on the scientific status of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psycho-anal. Assn., 18: 125–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York : Int. Univ. Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique. Int. J. Psychoanal, 74: 659–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2001). Recent developments in the technical approaches of English‐language psychoanalytic schools. Psychoanal. Q., 70: 519–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. & Steiner, R. (EDS) (1991) The Freud‐Klein Controversies, 1941–45. London and New York : Tavistock/ Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lussier, A. (1991). The search for common ground: a critique. Int. J. Psychoanal, 72: 57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge , MA and London : Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic Thought. New York : Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport, D. & Gill, M. M. (1959). The points of view and assumptions of metapsychology. Int. J. Psychoanal, 40: 153–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. D. (1992). The search for common ground. In The Common Ground of Psychoanalysis, ed. R. S. Wallerstein. Northvale , NJ and London : Jason Aron‐son, pp. 243–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role‐responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psycho Anal., 3: 43–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1987). From Safety to Superego: Selected Papers of Joseph Sandler. New York and London : Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1990). The search for common ground. Int. J. Psychoanal., 71: 49–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1997). The Contemporary Kleinians of London. Madison , CT : Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillius, E. Bott (ED.) (1988). Melanie Klein Today: Developments in Theory and Practice, Vol. 1: Mainly Theory, Vol. 2: Mainly Practice. London and New York : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1983). Self‐psychology and ‘classical’ psychoanalytic psychology: the nature of their relationship. Psycho-anal. and Cont. Thought, 6: 553–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many Int. J. Psychoanal., 69: 5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: the common ground. Int. J. Psychoanal., 71: 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1991). The future of psychotherapy. Bull. Menninger Clinic, 55: 421–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (ed.) (1992). The Common Ground of Psychoanalysis. Northvale , NJ : Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1998). The new American psychoanalysis: a commentary. J. Amer. Psycho-anal. Assn., 46: 1021–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (2000). The trajectory of psychoanalysis: past and future. Samiksa, 54: 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (2001). La Trajectoire de la psychanalyse: où en sommesnous aujourd'hui Rev. franç. de psychoanal. Numero hors serie: 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (2002). The growth and transformation of American ego psychology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 50: 135–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinshel, E. M. (1989). The future of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 58: 341–73.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. S. (2001). The interpersonal and Freudian traditions: convergences and divergences. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49: 427–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar