Primal seduction, matricial space and asymmetry in the psychoanalytic encounter

References

• Akhtar S. (1999). The distinction between needs and wishes: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 47:113–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado levy‐valensi E. (1962). Le dialogue psychanalytique [The psychoanalytic dialogue]. Paris : PUF, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Aron L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale , NJ : The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badoni M. (2002). Parents and their child‐And the analyst in the middle. Int J Psychoanal 83: 1111–31.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin J. (1988). The first bond. In: The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism and the problems of domination. London : Virago Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1962). Learning from experience. Northvale , NJ : Jason Aronson, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1963). Elements of psycho‐analysis. London : Karnac Books, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas C. (1987). The transformational object. In: The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London : Free Association Books, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Chabert C. (1999). Les voix interieures [Internal voices]. Annual Conference of French‐speaking analysts ‘Enjeux de la Passivite’. Rev Fr Psychanal LXIII:1446–88.
   Google Scholar
• Chetrit‐vatine V. (2003). The matricial space or the person in the analyst. Paper presented at the Panel of Child Psychoanalysis, EPF conference, Sorrento, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Chetrit‐vatine V. (2004). Un espace matriciel pour Mr E [A matricial space for Mr E]. Annual Conference of French‐speaking analysts ‘Le processus psychanalytique: Communications préalables’. Bull Soc Psychanal Paris 72.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. SE 7.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman IZ (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process. Hillsdale , NJ : The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas H. (1979). Le principe responsabilité [The responsibility principle]. Paris : Champs Flammarion, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan I. (2003). When words are used to touch. Psychoanalytic Psychol 20:117–30.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J. (1987a). Problématiques V: Le baquet. Transcendance du transfert [The bucket. Transcendence of the transfer]. Paris : PUF, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J. (1987b). Nouveaux fondements pour la psychanalyse: La séduction originaire [New bases of the psychoanalysis: Originating seduction]. Paris : PUF, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J. (1992). Le primat de l'autre en psychanalyse [The primality of the other in psychoanalysis]. Paris : Champs Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J. (1997). The theory of seduction and the problem of the other. Int J Psychoanal 78:653–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplanche J. (1998). Essays on otherness. London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1947). Le temps et l'autre [Time and the other]. Paris : PUF, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1948). De l'existence à l'existant [From existence to existing]. Paris : Librairie Philosophique, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1961). Totalité et infini: Essai sur l'extériorité [Totality and infinite: Essays on exteriority]. Paris : Le Livre de Poche.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1972). L'humanisme de l'autre homme [The humanism of the other man]. Paris : Le Livre de Poche.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1974). Otherwise than being: Or beyond essence. London : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1982a). Ethique comme philosophie premiere [Ethics as primal philosophy]. Paris : Rivages Poche, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1982b). Ethique et infini [Ethics and infinite]. Paris : Fayard, Radio‐France.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas E. (1982c). Entre nous: Essai sur le penser‐a‐l'autre [Between us: Essay on thinking of the other‐minding the other]. Paris : Le Livre de Poche.
   Google Scholar
• Meir E. (1994). The dimension of the feminine in Levinas' philosophy. Iyun 43. Bar Ilan University (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SA (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale , NJ : The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouaknin MA (1992). Méditations érotiques‐Essai sur Emmanuel Levinas [Erotic meditations‐Test on Emmanuel Levinas]. Paris : Balland.
   Google Scholar
• Rilke RM (1904). Letters. In: Rilke, on love and other difficulties, p. 27. Mood JJL, translator. New York : Norton, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Stein R. (1997). Analysis as a mutual endeavor‐What does it look like? Psychoanal Dialog 7:869–80.
   Google Scholar
• Stein R. (1998). The enigmatic dimension of sexual experience: The ‘otherness’ of sexuality and primal seduction. Psychoanalytic Q LXVII:594–625.
   Google Scholar
• Stern D., Sander L., Nahum J., Harrison A., Lyons‐ruth K., Morgan A., et al. (1998). Non‐interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy. The ‘something more’ than interpretation. Int J Psychoanal 79:903–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1963). The development of the capacity for concern. In: Maturational processes and the facilitating environment. London : Hogarth Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1964). The use of an object, and relating through identifications. In: Psychoanalytic Explorations. London : Karnac Books, 1989.
   Google Scholar