The Adult Attachment Interview and psychoanalytic outcome studies

References

• Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E., Wall S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol 2. London : Penguin, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol 3. London : Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Clyman RB (1991). The procedural organisation of emotions: A contribution from cognitive science to the psychoanalytic theory of therapeutic action. In Affect: Psychoanalytic perspectives, ed.T. Shapiro, R. Emde Science to the psychoanalytic 39: 349–82.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden PM (1985). Maltreated infants: Vulnerability and resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiat 26: 85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crittenden PM (1995). Attachment and psychopathology. In Attachment theory: Social developmental and clinical perspectives, ed.S. Goldberg et al., London : The Analytic Press, pp. 367–406.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden PM (1997). Towards an integrative theory of trauma: A dynamic‐maturation approach. In The Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology, Vol 10: Risk, trauma and mental processes , Rochester : Univ. of Rochester Press, pp. 34–84.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden PM (19992001). Attachment in adulthood: Coding manual for the Dynamic‐Maturational approach to the Adult Attachment Interview. Unpublished manuscript, available from the author. (Published in Italian 1999.).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond D., Clarkin J., Levine H., Levy K., Foelch P., Yeomans F. (1999). Borderline conditions and attachment: A preliminary report. PsychoanalInq 19: 831–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P. (1999). Memory and therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal 80: 215–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P., Target M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self‐organization. Dev & Psychopathol 9: 679–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P., Steele H., Steele M. (1991). Maternal representations of attachment during infancy predict the organisation of infant‐mother attachment atone year of age. Child Dev 62: 891–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P., Steele M., Steele H., Target M. (1997). Reflective‐Functioning Manual, Version 4.1: For application to Adult Attachment Interviews. London : Univ. College London.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P., Leigh T., Steele M., Steele H., Kennedy R., Mattoon G., Target M., Gerber A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification and response to psychotherapy. J Consult & Clin Psychol 64: 22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P., Steele M., Steele H., Leigh T., Kennedy R., Mattoon G., Target M. (1995). Attachment, the reflective self, and borderline states: The predictive specificity of the Adult Attachment Interview and pathological emotional development. In Attachment theory: Social, developmental, and clinical perspectives, ed.S. Goldberg et al., London : The Analytic Press, pp. 233–79.
   Google Scholar
• George C., Kaplan N., Main M. (1985). An Adult Attachment Interview: Interview protocol. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Grice HP (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts. ed.P. Cole, JL Moran, New York : Academic Press. pp. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad SE (1996). Evaluating psychoanalytic therapy. Scand Psychoanal Rev 19: 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse E. (1996). Discourse, memory and the Adult Attachment Interview: A note with emphasis on the emerging Cannot Classify category. Infant Ment Health J 17: 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel ER (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: Anew intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. Am J Psychiat 156: 505–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingmo B. (1990). Beyond semantics: Aclinicaland theoreticalstudy of isolation. IntJPsychoanal 71: 113–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingmo B. (1992). Issues in psychoanalytic research. Scand Psychoanal Rev 15: 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Leuzinger‐bohleber M., Pfeifer R. (2002). Remembering a depressive primary object: Memory in the dialogue between psychoanalysis and cognitive science. Int J Psy choanal 83: 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Main M. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In Attachment across the life cycle, ed.CM Parkes et al., London : Routledge, pp. 127–59.
   Google Scholar
• Main M. (1999). Epilogue: Attachment theory: Eighteen points with suggestions for future studies. In Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications, ed.J. Cassidy, PR Shaver, New York : Guilford, pp. 845–87.
   Google Scholar
• Main M., Goldwyn R. (1998). Adult attachment scoring and classification system. Unpublished scoring manual, Department of Psychology, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Main M., Solomon J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern: Procedures, findings, and implications for the classification of behavior. In Affective development in infancy, ed.TB Brazelton, M. Yogman, Norwood , NJ : Ablex pp. 121–60.
   Google Scholar
• Radke‐yarrow M., Cummings EM, Kuczynskil, Chapman M. (1985). Patterns of attachment in two‐ and three‐year‐olds in normalfamilies and families with parental depression. Child Dev 56: 519–615.
   Google Scholar
• Schacter DL, Tulving E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In Memory systems 1994, ed.DL Schacter, E. Tulving, Cambridge , MA : Bradford, pp. 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Stein Hetal. (1998). What do adult attachment scales measure? In Bulln Menninger Clin 62: 33–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomä H., Kächele H. (1975). Problems of metascience and methodology in clinical psychoanalytic research. Ann Psychoanal 3: 49–119.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving E. (1979). Memory research: What kind of progress? In Perspectives on memory research, ed.LG Nilsson Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum Associates, pp. 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrrell CL et al. (1999). Effective treatment relationships for persons with serious psychiatric disorders: The importance of attachment states of mind. J Consult & Clin Psychol 67: 725–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varvin S. (1999). The Oslo II study: A process‐outcome study of psychoanalysis. In An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis, ed.P. Fonagy, Univ. College London. Westen D, Gabbard GO (2002). Developments in cognitive neuroscience, II: Implications for theories of transference. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 50: 99–134.
   Google Scholar