984
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Does European patent law unfairly discriminate against medical devices as compared with pharmaceuticals?

, MA PhD (Professor of Ethics)

Bibliography

  • World Trade Organization. Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. signed in Marrakesh, Morocco: on 15 April 1994
  • European Patent Office. European Patent Convention. 15th edition. European Patent Office; Munich: 2013
  • Sterckx S. The moral justifiability of patents. Ethical Perspect 2006;13(2):249-65
  • Sterckx S, Cockbain J. Exclusions from Patentability – How far has the European Patent Office eroded boundaries? CUP; Cambridge: 2012
  • Cockbain J, Sterckx S. Is the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office authorised to extend the bounds of the patentable? Int Rev Intellect Property and Competition Law 2011;42(3):257-71
  • Rodes AB, Bostedt F, Dobrucki B, et al. editors. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office. 7th edition. European Patent Office; Munich: 2013. p. 145, 151
  • T-227/91 Second surgical use/Codman & Schurtleff. Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.02 of 15 December 1992. Available from: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/advanced-search.html [Last accessed 26 March 2015]
  • T-775/97 Expandable Grafts Partnership. Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.02 of 3 April 2001. Available from: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/advanced-search.html [Last accessed 26 March 2015]
  • T-1314/05 Retina Implant. Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.01 of 15 April 2008. Available from: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/advanced-search.html [Last accessed 26 March 2015]
  • T-1099/09 Coloplast. Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.08 of 12 January 2012. Available from: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/advanced-search.html [Last accessed 26 March 2015]
  • T-773/10 Gambro Lundia & The Binding Site Group. Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.02 of 24 October 2014. Available from: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/advanced-search.html [Last accessed 26 March 2015]
  • Srinivasan R, Milton C. EPO second medical use claims: the skinny SmPC loophole. Managing Intellectual Property, 1 October 2011. Available from: http://www.managingip.com/Article/2918674/Search/EPO-second-medical-use-claims-The-skinny-SmPC-loophole.html?Home=true&OrderType=1&Keywords=srinivasan&Brand=Site&tabSelected=True [Last accessed 26 March 2015]
  • Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 485 (Pat)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.