174
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Evaluation

Rubitecan

Pages 71-79 | Published online: 22 Dec 2005

Bibliography

  • PIZZOLATO JF, SALTZ LB: The camptothecins. Lancet (2003) 361(9376):2235-2242.
  • RASHEED ZA, RUBIN EH: Mechanisms of resistance to topoisomerase I-targeting drugs. Oncogene (2003) 22(47):7296-7304.
  • KUPPENS IE, BEIJNEN J, SCHELLENS JH: Topoisomerase I inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer: from intravenous to oral administration. Clin. Colorectal Cancer (2004) 4(3):163-180.
  • GARCIA-CARBONERO R, SUPKO JG: Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin. Cancer Res. (2002) 8(3):641-661.
  • PRATESI G, BERETTA GL, ZUNINO F: Gimatecan, a novel camptothecin with a promising preclinical profile. Anticancer Drugs (2004) 15(6):545-552.
  • MILLER AA, HERNDON JE II, GU L, GREEN MR: Phase II trial of karenitecin in patients with relapsed or refractory non-small cell lung cancer (CALGB 30004). Lung Cancer (2005) 48(3):399-407.
  • GELDERBLOM H, SALAZAR R, VERWEIJ J et al.: Phase I pharmacological and bioavailability study of oral diflomotecan (BN80915), a novel E-ring-modified camptothecin analogue in adults with solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. (2003) 9(11):4101-4107.
  • GILBERT BE, SERYSHEV A, KNIGHT V, BRAYTON C: 9-Nitrocamptothecin liposome aerosol: lack of subacute toxicity in dogs. Inhal. Toxicol. (2002) 14(2):185-197.
  • VERSCHRAEGEN CF, JAECKLE K, GIOVANELLA B, KNIGHT V, GILBERT BE: Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. (2000) 922:237-246.
  • DERAKHSHANDEH K, DADASHZADEH S: Liquid chromatographic quantitation of the lactone and the total of lactone and carboxylate forms of 9-nitrocamptothecin in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. (2005) 818(2):199-204.
  • ZAMBONI WC, JUNG LL, EGORIN MJ et al.: Relationship between plasma exposure of 9-nitrocamptothecin and its 9-aminocamptothecin metabolite and antitumor response in mice bearing human colon carcinoma xenografts. Clin. Cancer Res. (2005) 11(13):4867-4874.
  • CAO ZS, PANTAZIS P, MENDOZA J et al.: Structure-activity relationship of alkyl 9-nitrocamptothecin esters. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. (2003) 24(2):109-119.
  • GIOVANELLA BC, STEHLIN JS, HINZ HR et al.: Preclinical evaluation of the anticancer activity and toxicity of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin (rubitecan). Int. J. Oncol. (2002) 20(1):81-88.
  • GIOVANELLA BC, HINZ HR, KOZIELSKI AJ et al.: Complete growth inhibition of human cancer xenografts in nude mice by treatment with 20-(S)-camptothecin. Cancer Res. (1991) 51(11):3052-3055.
  • RUBIN E, WOOD V, BHARTI A et al.: A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a new camptothecin derivative, 9-aminocamptothecin. Clin. Cancer Res. (1995) 1(3):269-276.
  • TIAN Q, ZHANG J, TAN TM et al.: Human multidrug resistance associated protein 4 confers resistance to camptothecins. Pharm. Res. (2005) (In Press).
  • JUNG LL, RAMANATHAN RK, EGORIN MJ et al.: Pharmacokinetic studies of 9-nitrocamptothecin on intermittent and continuous schedules of administration in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (2004) 54(6):487-496.
  • ZAMBONI WC, JUNG LL, EGORIN MJ et al.: Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittently administered 9-nitrocamptothecin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. (2004) 10(15):5058-5064.
  • GOUNDER MK, SUN SL, SANDS H et al.: Development of a bioanalytical liquid chromatography method for quantitation of 9-nitrocamptothecin in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. (2004) 799(1):63-72.
  • SCHOEMAKER NE, MATHOT RA, SCHOFFSKI P et al.: Development of an optimal pharmacokinetic sampling schedule for rubitecan administered orally in a daily times five schedule. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (2002) 50(6):514-517.
  • SCHOFFSKI P, HERR A, VERMORKEN JB et al.: Clinical Phase II study and pharmacological evaluation of rubitecan in non-pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-significant effect of food intake on the bioavailability of the oral camptothecin analogue. Eur. J. Cancer (2002) 38(6):807-813.
  • ZAMBONI WC, GOEL S, IQBAL T et al.: Clinical and pharmacokinetic study evaluating the effect of food on the disposition of 9-nitrocamptothecin and its 9-aminocamptothecin metabolite in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (2005):1-9.
  • LI K, CHEN X, ZHONG D, LI Y: Identification of the metabolites of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos. (2003) 31(6):792-797.
  • ZHONG DF, LI K, XU JH, DU Y, ZHANG YF: Pharmacokinetics of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin in rats. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. (2003) 24(3):256-262.
  • GIOVANELLA BC, STEHLIN JS, WALL ME et al.: DNA topoisomerase I-targeted chemotherapy of human colon cancer in xenografts. Science (1989) 246(4933):1046-1048.
  • BERNACKI RJ, PERA P, GAMBACORTA P, BRUN Y, GRECO WR: In vitro antitumor activity of 9-nitro-camptothecin as a single agent and in combination with other antitumor drugs. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. (2000) 922:293-297.
  • KOSHKINA NV, GILBERT BE, WALDREP JC, SERYSHEV A, KNIGHT V: Distribution of camptothecin after delivery as a liposome aerosol or following intramuscular injection in mice. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (1999) 44(3):187-192.
  • LAWSON KA, ANDERSON K, SNYDER RM et al.: Novel vitamin E analogue and 9-nitro-camptothecin administered as liposome aerosols decrease syngeneic mouse mammary tumor burden and inhibit metastasis. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (2004) 54(5):421-431.
  • TEDESCO KL, BERLIN J, ROTHENBERG M et al.: A Phase I study of concurrent 9-nitro-20(s)-camptothecin (9NC/Orathecin™) and radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Radiother. Oncol. (2005) 76(1):54-58.
  • PANTAZIS P, HAN Z, BALAN K, WANG Y, WYCHE JH: Camptothecin and 9-nitrocamptothecin (9NC) as anti-cancer, anti-HIV and cell-differentiation agents. Development of resistance, enhancement of 9NC-induced activities and combination treatments in cell and animal models. Anti-Cancer Res. (2003) 23(5A):3623-3638.
  • KIM JS, AMORINO GP, PYO H, CAO Q, CHOY H: Radiation enhancement by the combined use of topoisomerase I inhibitors, RFS-2000 or CPT-11, and topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide in human lung cancer cells. Radiother. Oncol. (2002) 62(1):61-67.
  • AMORINO GP, HERCULES SK, MOHR PJ, PYO H, CHOY H: Preclinical evaluation of the orally active camptothecin analog, RFS-2000 (9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin) as a radiation enhancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. (2000) 47(2):503-509.
  • PANTAZIS P, CHATTERJEE D, HAN Z, WYCHE J: Modulation of 9-nitrocamptothecin-induced apoptosis by hyperthermia in human leukemia HL-60 cells. Anticancer Drugs (1999) 10(3):317-322.
  • NATELSON EA, GIOVANELLA BC, VERSCHRAEGEN CF et al.: Phase I clinical and pharmacological studies of 20-(S)-camptothecin and 20-(S)-9-nitrocamptothecin as anticancer agents. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. (1996) 803:224-230.
  • VERSCHRAEGEN CF, NATELSON EA, GIOVANELLA BC et al.: A Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of oral 9-nitrocamptothecin, a novel water-insoluble topoisomerase I inhibitor. Anticancer Drugs (1998) 9(1):36-44.
  • VERSCHRAEGEN CF, GILBERT BE, LOYER E et al.: Clinical evaluation of the delivery and safety of aerosolized liposomal 9-nitro-20(s)-camptothecin in patients with advanced pulmonary malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. (2004) 10(7):2319-2326.
  • CALVO E, ROWINSKY EK, TOLCHER AW et al.: A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of rubitecan, an orally administered topoisomerase I (topo-I) inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. (2004) 22(14S):2099 (Abstract).
  • MICHAELSON MD, RYAN DP, FUCHS CS et al.: A Phase I study of 9-nitrocamptothecin given concurrently with capecitabine in patients with refractory, metastatic solid tumors. Cancer (2003) 97(1):148-154.
  • VERSCHRAEGEN CF, VINCENT M, ABBRUZZESE JL et al.: Phase I study of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced malignancies. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. (2000) 922:345-348.
  • FRACASSO PM, RADER JS, GOVINDAN R et al.: Phase I study of rubitecan and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies. Ann. Oncol. (2002) 13(11):1819-1825.
  • STEHLIN JS, GIOVANELLA BC, NATELSON EA et al.: A study of 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS-2000) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Oncol. (1999) 14(5):821-831.
  • KONSTADOULAKIS MM, ANTONAKIS PT, TSIBLOULIS BG et al.: A Phase II study of 9-nitrocamptothecin in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (2001) 48(5):417-420.
  • BURRIS HA III, RIVKIN S, REYNOLDS R et al.: Phase II trial of oral rubitecan in previously treated pancreatic cancer patients. Oncologist (2005) 10(3):183-190.
  • VERSCHRAEGEN CF, GUPTA E, LOYER E et al.: A Phase II clinical and pharmacological study of oral 9-nitrocamptothecin in patients with refractory epithelial ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer. Anticancer Drugs (1999) 10(4):375-383.
  • PUNT CJ, DE JONGE MJ, MONFARDINI S et al.: RFS2000 (9-nitrocamptothecin) in advanced small cell lung cancer, a Phase II study of the EORTC New Drug Development Group. Eur. J. Cancer (2004) 40(9):1332-1334.
  • BAKA S, RANSON M, LORIGAN P et al.: A Phase II trial with RFS2000 (rubitecan) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer (2005) 41(11):1547-1550.
  • AMIN A, HALABI S, GELMANN EP et al.: 9-Nitrocamptothecin as second line chemotherapy for men with progressive, metastatic, hormone refractory prostate cancer: results of the CALGB 99901. Urol. Oncol. (2004) 22(5):398-403.
  • DE JONGE MJ, DROZ JP, PAZ-ARES L et al.: Phase II study on 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS 2000) in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial tract tumors. Invest. New Drugs (2004) 22(3):329-333.
  • MILLER KD, SOULE SE, HANEY LG et al.: A Phase II study of 9-nitro-camptothecin in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Invest. New Drugs (2004) 22(1):69-73.
  • CHEDID S, RIVERA E, FRYE DK et al.: Minimal clinical benefit of single agent Orathecin™ (rubitecan) in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. (2005):1-5.
  • CHUGH R, DUNN R, ZALUPSKI MM et al.: Phase II study of 9-nitro-camptothecin in patients with advanced chordoma or soft tissue sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. (2005) 23(15):3597-3604.
  • PATEL SR, BEACH J, PAPADOPOULOS N et al.: Results of a 2-arm Phase II study of 9-nitrocamptothecin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer (2003) 97(11):2848-2852.
  • RAYMOND E, CAMPONE M, STUPP R et al.: Multicentre Phase II and pharmacokinetic study of RFS2000 (9-nitro-camptothecin) administered orally 5 days a week in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Eur. J. Cancer (2002) 38(10):1348-1350.
  • ELLERHORST JA, BEDIKIAN AY, SMITH TM et al.: Phase II trial of 9-nitrocamptothecin (RFS 2000) for patients with metastatic cutaneous or uveal melanoma. Anticancer Drugs (2002) 13(2):169-172.
  • JACOBS A, BURRIS, HA, RIVKIN, S, RITCH, PS, EISENBERG PD, METTINGER KL: A randomized Phase III study of rubitecan (ORA) versus best choice (BC) in 409 patients with refractory pancreatic cancer report from a North-American multi-center study. J. Clin. Oncol. (2004) 22(14S):4013 (Abstract).
  • PAPISH S, RAMANATHAN R, PINCUS J, HIRMAND M, BURRIS HA: Patients rescued by crossover to rubitecan in Phase III study of rubitecan capsules versus 5-FU in pancreatic cancer. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. (2005):4165 (Abstract).
  • CHEVERTON P, FRIESS H, ANDRAS C et al.: Phase III results of exatecan (DX-89511) versus gemcitabine (Gem) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). J. Clin. Oncol. (2004) 22(14S):4005 (Abstract).
  • REILLY E, ABOU-ALFA GK, LETOURNEAU R et al.: A randomized Phase III trial of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate; DX) and gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). J. Clin. Oncol. (2004) 22(14S):4006 (Abstract).
  • ROCHA LIMA CM, GREEN MR, ROTCHE R et al.: Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J. Clin. Oncol. (2004) 22(18):3776-3783.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.