Iontophoretic transdermal fentanyl for the management of acute perioperative pain in hospitalized patients

References

• Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, et al. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, et al. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a us national survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jan;30(1):149–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum JL, Ashburn MA, Connis RT, et al. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):248–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens J, Laskin B, Pashos C, et al. The burden of acute postoperative pain and the potential role of the COX-2-specific inhibitors. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42(Suppl 3):40–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grass JA. Patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5 Suppl):S44–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, et al. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct;18(4):CD003348.
   Google Scholar
• Walder B, Schafer M, Henzi I, et al. Efficacy and safety of patient controlled opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain. A quantitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(7):795–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Schechter LN. Patient-controlled analgesia: finding a balance between cost and comfort. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Apr 15;63(8 Suppl 1):S3–S13.
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER. Emerging techniques in the treatment of postoperative pain. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Apr;61(Suppl 1):S11–S14.
   Google Scholar
• Chelly JE. An iontophoretic, fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system for acute postoperative pain management. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005 Jun;6(7):1205–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng PW, Sandler AN. A review of the use of fentanyl analgesia in the management of acute pain in adults. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):576–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grape S, Schug SA, Lauer S, et al. Formulations of fentanyl for the management of pain. Drugs. 2010;70(1):57–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry BW. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001 Sep;14(2):101–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill JG. Which potent opioid? Important criteria for selection. Drugs. 1987 May;33(5):520–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns GL, Heacook J, Daly SJ, et al. Percutaneous lidocaine administration via a new iontophoresis system in children: tolerability and absence of systemic bioavailability. Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):578–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen R, Miotti D, Bettaglio R, et al. Electromotive administration of a new morphine formulation: morphine citrate. Artif Organs. 1994 Jun;18(6):461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattia C, Coluzzi F. Acute postoperative pain management: focus on iontophoretic transdermal fentanyl. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Mar;3(1):19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/UCM446439.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency. Available from: http://www.themedicinescompany.com/investors/news/medicines-company-receives-chmp-positive-opinion-ionsys%C2%AE-treat-post-operative-pain
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra RS, Viscusi ER, Ding L, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in postoperative pain management. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 Aug;16(11):1607–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camu F, Van Aken H, Bovill JG. Postoperative analgesic effects of three demand-dose sizes of fentanyl administered by patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg. 1998 Oct;87(4):890–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathyan G, Phipps B, Gupta SK. Passive absorption of fentanyl from the fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):363–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathyan G, Jaskowiak J, Evashenk M, et al. Characterisation of the pharmacokinetics of the fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS): effect of current magnitude and multiple-day dosing and comparison with IV fentanyl administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(Suppl 1):7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps JB, Joshi N, Regal KA, et al. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of fentanyl iontophoretic trandermal system over a range of applied current. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015 Apr;11(4):481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Bernstein KJ, Noorduin H, et al. Fentanyl delivery from an electrotransport system: delivery is a function of total current, not duration of current. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;38(10):951–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Sathyan G, Phipps B, et al. Reproducible fentanyl doses delivered intermittently at different time intervals from an electrotransport system. J Pharm Sci. 1999 Aug;88(8):835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathyan G, Zomorodi K, Gidwani S, et al. The effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS). Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(Suppl 1):17–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta SK, Hwang S, Southam M, et al. Effects of application site and subject demographics on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS). Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(Suppl 1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelly JE, Grass J, Houseman TW, et al. The safety and efficacy of a fentanyl patient-controlled transdermal system for acute postoperative analgesia: a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Tait S, et al. An iontophoretic fentanyl patient-activated analgesic delivery system for postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Chung F, et al. Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1333–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, et al. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patientcontrolled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(6):806–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartrick CT, Bourne MH, Gargiulo K, et al. Fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for acute-pain management after orthopedic surgery: a comparative study with morphine intravenous patientcontrolled analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31(6):546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkowitz HS, Rathmell JP, Vallow S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery. Pain Med. 2007 Nov–Dec;8(8):657–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman M, Vallow S, Damaraju CV, et al. Using the patient global assessment of the method of pain control to assess new analgesic modalities in clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(6):1433–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Grond S, Ding L, et al. A comparison of opioid-related adverse events with fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in acute postoperative pain. Pain Manag. 2016 Jan;6(1):19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkowitz HS, Yarmush J, Donnell MT, et al. Safety and tolerability of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system: findings from a pooled data analysis of four clinical trials. J Opioid Manag. 2010;6(3):203–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartrick CT. Patient-controlled transdermal iontophoretic fentanyl system as an alternative to intravenous morphine PCA. Future Neurol. 2007;2(6):621–627.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):248–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIAARTI Study Group. Postoperative pain treatment SIAARTI Recommendations 2010. Short version. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Aug;76(8):657–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coluzzi F, Savoia G, Paoletti F, et al. Postoperative pain survey in Italy (POPSI): a snapshot of current national practices. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Nov;75(11):622–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer P, Ji X, Stephens J. Cost of opioid intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: results from a hospital database analysis and literature assessment. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun 20;6:311–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panchal SJ, Damaraju CV, Nelson WW, et al. System-related events and analgesic gaps during postoperative pain management with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphineintravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1437–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar