Defining interacting partners for drug discovery

Bibliography

• HARTWELL LH, SZANKASI E ROBERTS CJ, MURRAY AW, FRIEND SH: Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. Science (1997) 278:1064–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIELDS S, SONG O: A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature (1989) 340:245–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UETZ E GIOT L, CAGNEY G etal.: A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature (2000) 403:623–627.
   Google Scholar
• •The first systematic two-hybrid screen of yeast protein-protein interactions. The data reveal many new interactions as well as overall properties of interaction networks.
   Google Scholar
• RAIN JC, SELIG L, DE REUSE H et al: The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature (2001) 409:211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITO T, CHIBA T, OZAWA R et al: A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98:4569–4574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITO T, TASHIRO K, MUTA S etal.: Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: a comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97:1143–1147.
   Google Scholar
• XENARIOS I, SALWINSKI L, DUAN XJ et al: DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. (2002) 30:303–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REMY I, MICHNICK SW: Visualization of biochemical networks in living cells. Proc. Nati Acad. Sci. USA (2001) 98:7678–7683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •This work goes beyond the traditional screens for protein-protein interactions by deriving quantitative data on the extent and localisation of the interaction. This technique brings us closer to viewing the dynamic properties of interaction networks.
   Google Scholar
• REMY I, MICHNICK SW: Clonal selection and in vivo quantitation of protein interactions with protein-fragment complementation assays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96:5394–5399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PELLETIER JN, CAMPBELL-VALOIS FX, MICHNICK SW: Oligomerization domain directed reassembly of active dihydrofolate reductase from rationally designed fragments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1998) 95:12141–12146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAVIN AC, BOSCHE M, KRAUSE R et al.: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature (2002) 415:141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •The authors present a high-throughput technique for identifying protein-protein interactions using a combination of affinity purification and mass spectrometry. This technique represents an improvement over previous methodologies because the interacting proteins are expressed at native levels.
   Google Scholar
• HO Y, GRUHLER A, HEILBUT A et al: Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature (2002) 415:180–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VON MERING C, KRAUSE R, SNEL B et al.: Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature (2002) 417:399–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEANE CM, SALWINSKI L, XENARIOS I, EISENBERG D: Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteoinics (2002) 1:349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZHU H, BILGIN M, BANGHAM R et al:Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science (2001) 293:2101–2105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOH CS, BOGAN AA, JOACHIMIAK M, WALTHER D, COHEN FE: Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. Mol. Biol. (2000) 299:283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PELLEGRINI M, MARCOTTE EM, THOMPSON MJ, EISENBERG D, YEATES TO: Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96:4285–4288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VERT JP: A tree kernel to analyse phylogenetic profiles. Bioinformatics (2002) 18\(Suppl. 0:5276–5284.
   Google Scholar
• OVERBEEK R, FONSTEIN M, D'SOUZA M, PUSCH GD, MALTSEV N: The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96:2896–2901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DANDEKAR T, SNEL B, HUYNEN M, BORK P: Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochein. Sci. (1998) 23:324–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUYNEN MA, BORK P: Measuring genome evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1998) 95(11):5849–5856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARCOTTE EM, PELLEGRINI M, NG HL et al.: Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science (1999) 285:751–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENRIGHT AJ, ILIOPOULOS I, KYRPIDES NC, OUZOUNIS CA: Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature (1999) 402:86–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YANAI I, DERTI A, DELISI C: Genes linked by fusion events are generally of the same functional category: a systematic analysis of 30 microbial genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. ScL USA (2001) 98:7940–7645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUGHES TR, MARTON MJ, JONES AR et al: Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell (2000) 102:109–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EISEN MB, SPELLMAN PT, BROWN PO, BOTSTEIN D: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA (1998) 95:14863–14868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WINZELER EA, SHOEMAKER DD, ASTROMOFF A et al.: Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science (1999) 285:901–906.
   Google Scholar
• TONG AH, EVANGELISTA M, PARSONS AB et al.: Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science (2001) 294:2364–2368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PELLEGRINI M, THOMPSON M, FIERRO J, BOWERS P: Computational method to assign microbial genes to pathways. I Cell. Biochein. (2001) (Suppl. 37):106–109.
   Google Scholar
• •This work outlines an approach for combining several methods that deduce protein interactions from evolutionary data. The networks that emerge shed light on bacterial protein interactions and functions.
   Google Scholar
• MELLOR JC, YANAI I, CLODFELTER KH, MINTSERIS J, DELISI C: Predictome: a database of putative functional links between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. (2002) 30:306–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARCOTTE EM, PELLEGRINI M, THOMPSON MJ, YEATES TO, EISENBERG D: A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature (1999) 402:83–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIGAUT G, SHEVCHENKO A, RUTZ B et al.: A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nature Biotechnol. (1999) 17:1030–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HIGGINS D, THOMPSON J, GIBSON Tet al.: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22:4673–4680.
   Google Scholar
• ZHENG Y, SZUSTAKOWSKI JD, FORTNOW L, ROBERTS RJ, KASIF S: Computational identification of operons in microbial genomes. Cerrome Res. (2002) 12:1221–1230.
   Google Scholar
• LEE TI, RINALDI NJ, ROBERT F etal.:Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science (2002) 298:799–804.
   Google Scholar
• FITCH WM: Distinguishing homologousfrom analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. (1970) 19:99–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LEE TI, RINALDI NJ, ROBERT F etal.: Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science (2002) 298:799–804.
   Google Scholar
• KEMMEREN P, VAN BERKUM NL, VILO J etal.: Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. Mol. Cell (2002) 9:1133–1143.
   Google Scholar
• YANAI I, DELISI C: The society of genes: networks of functional links between genes from comparative genomics. Cerrome Biol. (2002) 3:research0064.
   Google Scholar
• BARABASI AL, ALBERT R: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286:509–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •This paper analyses the large-scale properties of networks, and demonstrates that a simple model of network evolution accounts for these observations.
   Google Scholar
• EONG H, MASON SP, BARABASI AL, OLTVAI ZN: Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature (2001) 411:41–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWIKOWSKI B, UETZ P, FIELDS S: A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nature Biotechnol. (2000) 18:1257–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNEL B, BORK P, HUYNEN MA: The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes. Proc. Nati Acad. Sd. USA (2002) 99:5890–5895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WATTS DJ, STROGATZ SH: Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOH CS, COHEN FE: Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. j Md. Biol. (2002) 324:177–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •The authors demonstrate that protein families that interact also tend to co-evolve. The phylogenetic trees of interacting protein families may be used to assign pair-wise interactions.
   Google Scholar
• JEONG H, TOMBOR B, ALBERT R, OLTVAI ZN, BARABASI AL: The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature (2000) 407(6804):651–654. Affiliation
   Google Scholar