Particle uptake by Peyer’s patches: a pathway for drug and vaccine delivery

Bibliography

• HUSSAIN N, JAITLEY V, FLORENCE AT: Recent advances in the understanding of uptake of microparticulates across the gastrointestinal lymphatics. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (2001) 50:107–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALLAOUI-ATTARKI K, PECQUET S, FATTAL E et al.: Protective immunity against Salmonella typhimucium elicited in mice by oral vaccination with phosphorylcholine encapsulated in poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. Infect. Inman. (1997) 65:853–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALLAOUI-ATTARKI K, FATTAL E, PECQUET S et al.: Mucosal immunogenicity elicited in mice by oral vaccination with phosphorylcholine encapsulated in poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. Vaccine (1998) 16:685–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALLEMANN E, LEROUX J, GURNY R: Polymeric nano- and microparticles for the oral delivery of peptides and peptidomimetics. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (1998) 34:171–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FATTAL E, PECQUET S, COUVREUR P, ANDREMONT A: Biodegradable microparticles for the mucosal delivery of antibacterial and dietary antigens. Int. Pharm. (2002) 242:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Summary of application of oral administration of particles for stimulation and suppression of the immune system.
   Google Scholar
• FATTAL E, ROQUES B, PUISIEUX F, BLANCO-PRIETO MJ, COUVREUR P: Multiple emulsion technology for the design of microspheres containing peptides and oligopeptides. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev (1997) 28:85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JANI P, HALBERT GW, LANGRIDGE J, FLORENCE AT: The uptake and translocation of latex nanospheres and microspheres after oral administration to rats. Phann. Pharmacol (1989) 41:809–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JEPSON MA, SIMMONS NL, SAVIDGE TC, JAMES PS, HIRST BH: Selective binding and transcytosis of latex microspheres by rabbit intestinal M cells. Cell Tissue Res. (1993) 271:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, HANCOCK DC, JOEL DD: Intestinal barrier to large particulates in mice. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. (1980) 6:691–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JEPSON M, SIMMONS N, O'HAGAN DT, HIRST BH: Comparison of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) and polystyrene microsphere targeting to intestinal M cells. Drug Target. (2003) 11:269–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DELIE F: Evaluation of nano- and microparticle uptake by the gastrointestinal tract. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev (1998) 34:221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAURY J, NICOLETTI C, GUZZO-CHAMBRAUD L, MAROUX S: The filamentous brush border glycocalyx, a mucin-like marker of enterocyte hyper-polarization. Eur: I Biochem. (1995) 228:323–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FREY A, GIANNASCA KT, WELTZIN R et al.: Role of the glycocalyx in regulating access of microparticles to apical plasma membranes of intestinal epithelial cells: implications for microbial attachment and oral vaccine targeting. Exp. Med. (1996) 184:1045–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OUELLETTE AJ, SATCHELL DP, HSIEH MM, HAGEN SJ, SELSTED ME: Characterization of luminal paneth cell alpha-defensins in mouse small intestine. Attenuated antimicrobial activities of peptides with truncated amino termini. J. Biol. Chem. (2000) 275:33969–33973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OUELLETTE AJ, SELSTED ME: Paneth cell defensins: endogenous peptide components of intestinal host defense. FASEB J. (1996) 10:1280–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AYABE T, SATCHELL DP, PESENDORFER P et al.: Activation of Paneth cell alpha-defensins in mouse small intestine. J. Biol. Chem. (2002) 277:5219–5228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AYABE T, SATCHELL DP, WILSON CL, PARKS WC, SELSTED ME, OUELLETTE AJ: Secretion of microbicidal alpha-defensins by intestinal Paneth cells in response to bacteria. Nat. Immunol (2000) 1:113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUBOUIX A, CAMPANAC C, FAUVEL J et al.: Bactericidal properties of group Ha secreted phospholipase A(2) against Pseudomonas aemginosa clinical isolates. Med. Microbial. (2003) 52:1039–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OUELLETTE AJ: Paneth cells and innateimmunity in the crypt microenvironment. Gastroenterology (1997) 113: 1779–1784.
   Google Scholar
• OUELLETTE AJ: Defensin-mediated innate immunity in the small intestine. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterology (2004) 18:405–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PORTER EM, BEVINS CL, GHOSH D, GANZ T: The multifaceted paneth cell. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2002) 59:156–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRANDTZAEG P, FARSTAD IN, HARALDSEN G: Regional specialization in the mucosal immune system: primed cells do not always home along the same track. Immunol Today (1999) 20: 267–277.
   Google Scholar
• CAMPBELL DJ, BUTCHER EC: Intestinal attraction: CCL25 functions in effector lymphocyte recruitment to the small intestine. Clin. Invest. (2002) 110:1079–1081.
   Google Scholar
• KRAEHENBUHL JP, NEUTRA MR: Epithelial M cells: differentiation and function. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. (2000) 16:301–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Complete description of M cells.
   Google Scholar
• OWEN RL: Uptake and transport of intestinal macromolecules and microorganisms by M cells in Peyer's patches-a personal and historical perspective. Semin. Immunol (1999) 11:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OWEN RL, BHALLA DK: Cytochemical analysis of alkaline phosphatase and esterase activities and of lectin-binding and anionic sites in rat and mouse Peyer's patch M cells. Am. J. Anat. (1983) 168:199–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SAVIDGE TC, SMITH MW: Evidence that membranous (M) cell genesis is immuno-regulated. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. (1995) 371A:239–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SIEBERS A, FINLAY BB: M cells and thepathogenesis of mucosal and systemic infections. Trends Microbiol (1996) 4:22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEUTRA MR, FREY A, KRAEHENBUHL JP: Epithelial M cells: gateways for mucosal infection and immunization. Cell (1996) 86:345–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FASANO A: Novel approaches for oral delivery of macromolecules. Pharm. Se (1998) 87:1351–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEUTRA MR, MANTIS NJ, FREY A, GIANNASCA PJ: The composition and function of M cell apical membranes: implications for microbial pathogenesis. Semin. Immunol (1999) 11:171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Description of the mechanism ofpenetration of microorganisms through the M cell.
   Google Scholar
• BHALLA DK, OWEN RL: Cell renewal and migration in lymphoid follicles of Peyer's patches and cecum-an autoradiographic study in mice. Gastroenterology (1982) 82:232–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMITH MW, SYME G: Functional differentiation of enterocytes in the follicle-associated epithelium of rat Peyer's patch. Cell Sci. (1982) 55:147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BYE WA, ALLAN CH, TRIER JS: Structure, distribution, and origin of M cells in Peyer's patches of mouse ileum. Gastroenterology (1984) 86:789–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, STEINMETZ I, FASSBENDER S, WENDLANDT KH: Antigen transport into Peyer's patches: increased uptake by constant numbers of M cells. Am. J. Pathol (2004) 164:65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KITAGAWA H, HOSOKAWA M, TAKEUCHI T, YOKOYAMA T, IMAGAWA T, UEHARA M: The cellular differentiation of M cells from crypt undifferentiated epithelial cells into microvillous epithelial cells in follicle-associated epithelia of chicken cecal tonsils. Vet. Med. Sci. (2003) 65:171–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LELOUARD H, SAHUQUET A, REGGIO H, MONTCOURRIER P: Rabbit M cells and dome enterocytes are distinct cell lineages. Cell Sci. (2001) 114:2077–2083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, HACH G: Differential binding of lectins to M cells and enterocytes in the rabbit cecum. Gastroenterology (1993) 105:1350–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAPPO J: Generation and characterizationof monoclonal antibodies recognizing follicle epithelial M cells in rabbit gut-associated lymphoid tissues. Cell. Immunol (1989) 120:31-41. One of the first papers describing targets on M cells.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SMITH MW, JAMES PS, TIVEY DR: M cell numbers increase after transfer of SPF mice to a normal animal house environment. Am. .1 Pathol (1987) 128:385–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAVIDGE TC, SMITH MW, JAMES PS, ALDRED P: Salmonella-induced M-cell formation in germ-free mouse Peyer's patch tissue. Am. Pathol (1991) 139:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BORGHESI C, REGOLI M, BERTELLI E, NICOLETTI C: Modifications of the follicle-associated epithelium by short-term exposure to a non-intestinal bacterium. .1. Pathol (1996) 180:326–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, POSSELT W: Glycoconjugateexpression defines the origin and differentiation pathway of intestinal M-cells..1. Histochem. Cytochem. (1997) 45:1341–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, FASSBENDER S, WERNER K, WEISSFERDT A: The development of M cells in Peyer's patches is restricted to specialized dome-associated crypts. Am. Pathol (1999) 154:1573–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANS ONETTI PJ, ARONDEL J, CANTEY JR, PREVOST MC, HUERRE M: Infection of rabbit Peyer's patches by Shigella flexneri: effect of adhesive or invasive bacterial phenotypes on follicle-associated epithelium. Infect. Immun. (1996) 64:2752–2764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KERNEIS S, BOGDANOVA A, KRAEHENBUHL JP, PRINGAULT E: Conversion by Peyer's patch lymphocytes of human enterocytes into M cells that transport bacteria. Science (1997) 277:949–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KERNEIS S, PRINGAULT E: Plasticity of the gastrointestinal epithelium: the M cell paradigm and opportunism of pathogenic microorganisms. Semin. Immunol (1999) 11:205–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GULLBERG E, LEONARD M, KARLSSON J et al.: Expression of specific markers and particle transport in a new human intestinal M-cell model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (2000) 279:808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIANG E, KABCENELL AK, COLEMAN JR, ROBSON J, RUFFLES R, YAZDANIAN M: Permeability measurement of macromolecules and assessment of mucosal antigen sampling using in vitro converted M cells. Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. (2001) 46:93-101. First description of in vitro model of PPs.
   Google Scholar
• TYRER P, RUTH FOX WELL A, KYD J,HARVEY M, SIZER P, CRIPPS A: Validation and quantitation of an M vitro M-cell model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (2002) 299:377–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KUCHARZIK T, LUGERING N, RAUTENBERG K et al.: Role of M cells in intestinal barrier function. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. (2000) 915:171–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JEPSON MA, CLARK MA: Studying M cells and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol (1998) 6:359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOGHADDAMI M, CUMMINS A, MAYRHOFER G: Lymphocyte-filled villi: comparison with other lymphoid aggregations in the mucosa of the human small intestine. Gastroenterology (1998) 115:1414–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEREN DF, HOLT PS, COLLINS HH, GEMSKI P, FORMAL SB: The role of Peyer's patches in the local immune response of rabbit ileum to live bacteria. Immunol (1978) 120:1892–1896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAMADA H, HIROI T, NISHIYAMA Y et al.: Identification of multiple isolated lymphoid follicles on the antimesenteric wall of the mouse small intestine. Immunol (2002) 168:57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROSNER AJ, KEREN DF: Demonstration of M cells in the specialized follicle-associated epithelium overlying isolated lymphoid follicles in the gut.' Leukoc. Biol. (1984) 35:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LORENZ RG, CHAPLIN DD, MCDONALD KG, MCDONOUGH JS, NEWBERRY RD: Isolated lymphoid follicle formation is inducible and dependent upon lymphotoxin-sufficient B lymphocytes, lymphotoxin beta receptor, and TNF receptor I function. Immunol (2003) 170:5475–5482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAGARASAN S, HONJO T: Intestinal IgA synthesis: regulation of front-line body defences. Nat Rev Immunol (2003) 3:63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VOLKHEIMER G, SCHULZ FH: The phenomenon of persorption. Digestion (1968) 1:213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VOLKHEIMER G, SCHULZ FH, AURICH I, STRAUCH S, BEUTHIN K, WENDLANDT H: Persorption of particles. Digestion. (1968) 1:78–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALPAR HO, FIELD WN, HYDE R, LEWIS DA: The transport of microspheres from the gastro-intestinal tract to inflammatory air pouches in the rat. Pharm. Pharmacol (1989) 41:194–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APRAHAMIAN M, MICHEL C, HUMBERT W, DEVISSAGUET JP, DAM GE C: Transmucosal passage of polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanocapsules as a new drug carrier in the small intestine. Biol. Cell. (1987) 61:69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAMGE C, APRAHAMIAN M, HUMBERT W, PINGET M: heal uptake of polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanocapsules in the rat. Pharm. Pharmacol (2000) 52:1049–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHIPPER NG, OLSSON S, HOOGSTRAATE JA, DEBOER AG, VARUM KM, ARTURSSON P: Chitosans as absorption enhancers for poorly absorbable drugs 2: mechanism of absorption enhancement. Pharm. Res. (1997) 14:923–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PREDA M, LEUCUTA SE: Oxprenolol-loaded bioadhesive microspheres: preparation and in vitro/ in vivo characterization. Microencapsul (2003) 20:777–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BJORK E., ISAKSSON U., EDMAN P, ARTURSSON P: Starch microspheres induce pulsatile delivery of drugs and peptides across the epithelial barrier by reversible separation of the tight junctions. Drug Target. (1995) 2:501–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERNKOP-SCHNURCH A, KAST CE, GUGGI D: Permeation enhancing polymers in oral delivery of hydrophilic macromolecules: thiomer/GSH systems. Control. Release (2003) 93:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RESCIGNO M, URBANO M, VALZASINA B et al.: Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria. Nat. Immunol (2001) 2:361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Demonstration of uptake of micoorganisms by dendritic cells.
   Google Scholar
• SANDERS E, ASHWORTH CT: A study of particulate intestinal absorption and hepatocellular uptake. Use of polystyrene latex particles. Exp. Cell Res. (1961) 22:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATHIOWITZ E, JACOB JS, JONG YS et al.: Biologically erodable microspheres as potential oral drug delivery systems. Nature (1997) 386:410–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEHRENS I, PENA Al, ALONSO MJ, KISSEL T: Comparative uptake studies of bioadhesive and non-bioadhesive nanoparticles in human intestinal cell lines and rats: the effect of mucus on particle adsorption and transport. Pharm. Res. (2002) 19:1185–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Contains an interesting technique of triple labelling for following particle uptake.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, HIRST BH, JEPSON MA: Lectin-mediated mucosal delivery of drugs and microparticles. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (2000) 43:207–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Interesting review on lectin-mediated uptake.
   Google Scholar
• WELLS CL, MADDAUS MA, ERLANDSEN SL, SIMMONS RL: Evidence for the phagocytic transport of intestinal particles in dogs and rats. Infect. Inman. (1988) 56:278–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOMOTAN EA, BROWN KA, SPEAKER TJ, OFFITA PA: Aqueous-based microcapsules are detected primarily in gut-associated dendritic cells after oral inoculation. Vaccine (1997) 15:1959–1962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBEL JP: A method for quantifying particle absorption from the small intestine of the mouse. Pharm. Res. (1990) 7:848–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCCLEAN S, PROSSER E, MEEHAN E et al.: Binding and uptake of biodegradable poly(DL-lactide) micro- and nanoparticles in intestinal epithelia. Ear: J. Pharm. Sci. (1998) 6:153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLORENCE AT: The oral absorption of micro- and nanoparticulates: neither exceptional nor unusual. Pharm. Res. (1997) 14:259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, WARREN JB, JOEL DD: Particles and macrophages in murine Peyer's patches. Exp. Cell Biol. (1985) 53:121–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KOFLER N, RUEDL C, RIESER C, WICK G, WOLF H: Oral immunization with poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly-(L-lactic acid) microspheres containing pneumotropic bacterial antigens. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol (1997) 113:424–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JANI P, HALBERT GW, LANGRIDGE J, FLORENCE AT: Nanoparticle uptake by the rat gastrointestinal mucosa: quantitation and particle size dependency. I Pharm. Pharmacol (1990) 42:821–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DESAI MP, LABHASETWAR V, AMIDON GL, LEVY RJ: Gastrointestinal uptake of biodegradable microparticles: effect of particle size. Pharm. Res. (1996) 13:1838–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELDRIDGE JH, HAMMOND CJ, MEULBROEK JA, STAAS JK, GILLEY RM, TICE TR: Controlled vaccine release in the gut-associated lymphoid tissues. I. Orally administered biodegradable microspheres target the peyer's patches. Control. Release (1990) 11:205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Comparison of uptake by Peyer's patchesof several types of particles.
   Google Scholar
• LE VISAGE C, COUVREUR P, MYSIAKINE E, BRETON P, BRU N, FATTAL E: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of poly(methylidene malonate 2.1.2) microparticles behavior for oral administration. I Drug Target. (2001) 9:141–153.
   Google Scholar
• ••Demonstration of particles that are nottaken up by intestinal cells.
   Google Scholar
• SHAKWEH M, CALVO P, GOURITIN B, ALPHANDARY H, FATTAL E: Uptake of biodegradable nano- and microparticles by Peyer's patches after oral administration to mice. Proceeding of 4th World Meeting on Pharmaceutics, Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Florence, Italy (2002).
   Google Scholar
• HILLERY AM, FLORENCE AT: The effect of adsorbed poloxamer 188 and 407 surfactants on the intestinal uptake of 60-nm polystyrene particles after oral administration in the rat. Lit. I Pharm. (1996) 132:123–130.
   Google Scholar
• HOSHI S, UCHINO A, KUSANAGI K, IHARA T, UEDA S: Uptake of orally administered polystyrene latex and poly(D,L-lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres into intestinal lymphoid tissues in chickens. Vet. Immunol Immunopathol (1999) 70:33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHAKWEH M, BESNARD M, NICOLAS V, FATTAL E: Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) particles of different physicochemical proprties and their uptake by Peyer's patches in mice. (Submitted).
   Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, JEPSON MA, SIMMONS NL, HIRST BH: Selective binding and transcytosis of Ulex europaeusl lectin by mouse Peyer's patch M-cells in vivo. Cell Tissue Res. (1995) 282:455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, JEPSON MA, HIRST BH: Exploiting M cells for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (2001) 50:81–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOSTER N, CLARK MA, JEPSON MA, HIRST BH: Ulex europaeus 1 lectin targets microspheres to mouse Peyer's patch M-cells M vivo. Vaccine. (1998) 16:536–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JEPSON MA, CLARK MA, HIRST BH: M cell targeting by lectins: a strategy for mucosal vaccination and drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev. (2004) 56:511–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PORTA C, JAMES PS, PHILLIPS AD, SAVIDGE TC, SMITH MW, CREMASCHI D: Confocal analysis of fluorescent bead uptake by mouse Peyer's patch follicle-associated M cells. Exp. Physic] (1992) 77:929–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMITH MW, THOMAS NW, JENKINS PG, MILLER NG, CREMASCHI D, PORTA C: Selective transport of microparticles across Peyer's patch follicle-associated M cells from mice and rats. Exp. Physiol (1995) 80:735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAPPO J, ERMAK TH, STEGER HJ: Monoclonal antibody-directed targeting of fluorescent polystyrene microspheres to Peyer's patch M cells. Immunology (1991) 73:277–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, AL-SAMIR K, WERNER K,FASSBENDER S, GEBHARD A: The apical membrane of intestinal brush cells possesses a specialised, but species-specific, composition of glycoconjugates-on-section and in vivo lectin labelling in rats, guinea-pigs and mice. Histochem. Cell Biol. (2000) 113:389–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WOODLEY JF: Lectins for gastrointestinal targeting - 15 years on. Drug Target. (2000) 7:325–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHARMA R, SCHUMACHER U: Carbohydrate expression in the intestinal mucosa. Adv. Anat. Embryo.] Cell Biol. (2001) 160:1–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBHARD A, GEBERT A: Brush cells of the mouse intestine possess a specialized glycocalyx as revealed by quantitative lectin histochemistry. Further evidence for a sensory function. J. Histochem. Cytochem. (1999) 47:799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, JEPSON MA, SIMMONS NL, BOOTH TA, HIRST BH: Differential expression of lectin-binding sites defines mouse intestinal M-cells. Histochem. Cytochem. (1993) 41:1679–1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIANNASCA PJ, GIANNASCA KT, FALK P, GORDON JI, NEUTRA MR: Regional differences in glycoconjugates of intestinal M cells in mice: potential targets for mucosal vaccines. Am. J. Physiol (1994) 267:G1108–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIANNASCA PJ, GIANNASCA KT, LEICHTNER AM, NEUTRA MR: Human intestinal M cells display the sialyl Lewis A antigen. Infect. Inman. (1999) 67:946–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JEPSON MA, MASON CM, SIMMONS NL, HIRST BH: Enterocytes in the follicle-associated epithelia of rabbit small intestine display distinctive lectin-binding properties. Histochein. Cell Biol. (1995) 103:131–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROY MJ, VARVAYANIS M: Development of dome epithelium in gut-associated lymphoid tissues: association of IgA with M cells. Cell Tissue Res. (1987) 248:645–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WELTZIN R, LUCIA-JANDRIS P, MICHETTI P, FIELDS BN, KRAEHENBUHL JP, NEUTRA MR: Binding and transepithelial transport of immunoglobulins by intestinal M cells: demonstration using monoclonal IgA antibodies against enteric viral proteins. .1. Cell Biol. (1989) 108:1673–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MANTIS NJ, CHEUNG MC, CHINTALACHARUVU KR, REY J, CORTHESY B, NEUTRA MR: Selective adherence of IgA to murine Peyer's patch M cells: evidence for a novel IgA receptor. .1. Iininunol (2002) 169: 1844–1851.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, HIRST BH, JEPSON MA: M-cell surface betal integrin expression and invasin-mediated targeting of Yersinia pseudotuberculosisto mouse Peyer's patch M cells. Infect. Inman. (1998) 66:1237–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LELOUARD H, REGGIO H, MANGEAT P, NEUTRA M, MONTCOURRIER P: Mucin-related epitopes distinguish M cells and enterocytes in rabbit appendix and Peyer's patches. Infect. Inman. (1999) 67:357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LELOUARD H, REGGIO H, ROY C, SAHUQUET A, MANGEAT P, MONTCOURRIER P: Glycocalyx on rabbit intestinal M cells displays carbohydrate epitopes from Muc2. Infect. Inman. (2001) 69: 1061–1071.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, JEPSON MA: Intestinal cells and their role in bacterial infection. Int.j Med. Microbiol (2003) 293: 17–39.
   Google Scholar
• SANS ONETTI PJ, PHALIPON A: M cells as ports of entry for enteroinvasive pathogens: mechanisms of interaction, consequences for the disease process. Seinin. Iininunol (1999)11:193–203.
   Google Scholar
• KEEGAN ME, WHITTUM-HUDSON JA, MARK SALTZMAN W: Biomimetic design in microparticulate vaccines. Bioinaterials. (2003) 24:4435–4443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LR (Ed.), Raven Press, New York. (1987):975–1009.
   Google Scholar
• NORRIS DA, SINKO PJ: Effect of size, surface charge, and hydrophobicity on the translocation of polystyrene microspheres through gastrointestinal mucin. I Appl. Poly Sci. (1997) 63:1481–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SZENTKUTI L: Light microscopical observations on luminally administered dyes, dextrans, nanospheres and microspheres in the pre-epithelial mucus gel layer of the rat distal colon. Control. Release. (1997) 46:233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KHAN J, IIBOSHI Y, CUI L, WASA M, OKADA A: Role of intestinal mucus on the uptake of latex beads by Peyer's patches and on their transport to mesenteric lymph nodes in rats. Parente]: Enteral. Nutr. (1999) 23: 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• MANTIS NJ, FREY A, NEUTRA MR: Accessibility of glycolipid and oligosaccharide epitopes on rabbit villus and follicle-associated epithelium. Jim..! Physiol Gastrointest. Liver Physiol (2000) 278:G915–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CORNES JS: Peyer's patches in the human gut. Proc. R. Soc. Med. (1965) 58:716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GEBERT A, ROTHKOTTER HJ, PABST R: M cells in Peyer's patches of the intestine. Int. Rev Cytol. (1996) 167:91H159.
   Google Scholar
• ABE K, ITO T: Qualitative and quantitative morphologic study of Peyer's patches of the mouse after neonatal thymectomy and hydrocortisone injection. Ain. J. Anat. (1978) 151:227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAULK WP, MCCORMICK JN, GOODMAN JR, YOFFEY JM, FUDENBERG HH: Peyer's patches: morphologic studies. Cell. Iininunol (1970) 1:500–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OWEN RL, ERMAK TH: Structural specializations for antigen uptake and processing in the digestive tract. Springer Seinin. Intinunopathol (1990) 12: 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK MA, JEPSON MA, SIMMONS NL, HIRST BH: Differential surface characteristics of M cells from mouse intestinal Peyer's and caecal patches. Histochein. (1994) 26:271–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SMITH MW, PEACOCK MA: 'M' cell distribution in follicle-associated epithelium of mouse Peyer's patch. Am. Anat. (1980) 159:167–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PAPPO J, STEGER HJ, OWEN RL: Differential adherence of epithelium overlying gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Lab. Invest. (1988) 58:692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, HACH G, BARTELS H: Co-localization of vimentin and cytokeratins in M-cells of rabbit gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). Cell Tissue Res. (1992) 269:331–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JEPSON MA, SIMMONS NL, HIRST GL, HIRST BH: Identification of M cells and their distribution in rabbit intestinal Peyer's patches and appendix. Cell Tissue Res. (1993) 273: 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• GEBERT A, ROTHKOTTER HJ, PABST R: Cytokeratin 18 is an M-cell marker in porcine Peyer's patches. Cell Tissue Res. (1994) 276:213–221.
   Google Scholar
• JEPSON MA, CLARK MA, FOSTER N et al.: Targeting to intestinal M cells. Anat. (1996) 189:507–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BHAGAT HR, WILLIAMS W, METELITSA D, MONATH TP: Investigation of microsphere uptake in animals. Proceedings of the Controlled Release Socieg, (1994):579–580.
   Google Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, BOCCIO AM, JOEL DD: Intestinal uptake of fluorescent microspheres in young and aged mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1989) 190:23–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEIFERT J, HARASZTI B, SASS W: The influence of age and particle number on absorption of polystyrene particles from the rat gut. Anat. (1996) 189:483–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIMON L, SHINE G, DAYAN AD: Effect of animal age on the uptake of large particulates across the epithelium of the rat small intestine. Int. Exp. Pathol (1994) 75:369–373.
   Google Scholar
• VELIN AK, ERICSON AC, BRAAF Y, WALLON C, SODERHOLM JD: Increased antigen and bacterial uptake in follicle associated epithelium induced by chronic psychological stress in rats. Gut. (2004) 53:494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCMINN LH, HODGES GM, CARR KE: Gastrointestinal uptake and translocation of microparticles in the streptozotocin-diabetic rat. Anat. (1996) 189:553–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FUJIMURA Y, OWEN RL: Tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine reduce the uptake and transport of particles into rabbit Peyer's patches. Transplantation (2002) 73:1049–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIMON L, WARREN I, DAYAN AD: Effect of solid and liquid diet on uptake of large particulates across intestinal epithelium in rats. DV. Dis. Sci. (1997) 42:1519–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EYLES J, ALPAR O, FIELD WN, LEWIS DA, KESWICK M: The transfer of polystyrene microspheres from the gastrointestinal tract to the circulation after oral administration in the rat. J. Pharin. Pharinacol (1995) 47:561–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, OLIVO R, VANDERHOFF JW, JOEL DD: Accumulation of latex in Peyer's patches and its subsequent appearance in villi and mesenteric lymph nodes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1978) 159:298–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, VANDERHOFF JW, LAISSUE JA, JOEL DD: Accumulation of 2-micron latex particles in mouse Peyer's patches during chronic latex feeding. Experientia (1978) 34:120–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, JOEL DD, SCHIDLOVSKY G: Retention of ingested latex particles in Peyer's patches of germfree and conventional mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1985) 179:522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN DER LUBBEN IM, KONINGS FA, BORCHARD G, VERHOEF JC, JUNGINGER HE: In vivo uptake of chitosan microparticles by murine Peyer's patches: visualization studies using confocal laser scanning microscopy and immunohistochemistry. I Drug Target. (2001) 9:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEYNELL HM, THOMAS NW, JAMES PS, HOLLAND J, TAUSSIG MJ, NICOLETTI C: Up-regulation of microsphere transport across the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer's patch by exposure to Streptococcus pneuinoniae R36a. FASEB (1999) 13:611–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARR KE, HAZZARD RA, REID S, HODGES GM: The effect of size on uptake of orally administered latex microparticles in the small intestine and transport to mesenteric lymph nodes. Pharin. Res. (1996) 13:1205–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAMGE C, APRAHAMIAN M, MARCHAIS H, BENOIT JP, PINGET M: Intestinal absorption of PLAGA microspheres in the rat. " Anat. (1996) 189:491–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HODGES GM, CARR EA, HAZZARD RA, CARR KE: Uptake and translocation of microparticles in small intestine. Morphology and quantification of particle distribution. DV. Dis. Sci. (1995) 40:967–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JEPSON MA, SIMMONS NL, O'HAGAN DT, HIRST BH: Comparison of poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) and polystyrene microsphere targeting to intestinal M cells. J. Drug Target. (2003) 11:269–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OWEN RL, JONES AL: Epithelial cell specialization within human Peyer's patches: an ultrastructural study of intestinal lymphoid follicles. Gastroenterology (1974) 66:189–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEIER R, GEBERT A: Kinetics of particle uptake in the domes of Peyer's patches. Ain. J. Physiol (1998) 275:G130–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Unique demonstration of particle transport kinetics across M cells.
   Google Scholar
• LIMPANUSSORN J, SIMON L, DAYAN AD: Transepithelial transport of large particles in rat: a new model for the quantitative study of particle uptake. .1. Pharin. Pharinacol (1998) 50:753–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIMPANUSSORN J, SIMON L, DAYAN AD: Intestinal uptake of particulate material by dexamethasone-treated rats: use of a novel technique to avoid intestinal mucosal contamination. .1. Pharin. Pharinacol (1998) 50:745–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIMON L, SHINE G, DAYAN AD: Translocation of particulates across the gut wall - a quantitative approach. .1. Drug Target. (1995) 3:217–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JENKINS PG, HOWARD KA, BLACKHALL NW, THOMAS NW, DAVIS SS, O'HAGAN DT: The quantitation of the absorption of microparticles into the intestinal lymph of Wistar rats. Int. J. Phann. (1994) 102:261H266.
   Google Scholar
• DESAI MP, LABHASETWAR V, WALTER E, LEVY RJ, AMIDON GL: The mechanism of uptake of biodegradable microparticles in Caco-2 cells is size dependent. Pharin. Res. (1997) 14:1568–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HILLERY AM, JANI PU, FLORENCE AT: Comparative, quantitative study of lymphoid and non-lymphoid uptake of 60 nm polystyrene particles.j Drug Target. (1994) 2:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLORENCE AT, HILLERY AM, HUSSAIN N, JANI PU: Nanoparticles as carriers for oral peptide absorption: Studies on particle uptake and fate. I Control. Release. (1995) 36:39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, JOEL DD: Distribution of label after intragastric administration of 7Be-labeled carbon to weanling and aged mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1986) 182:112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROPERT C, BAZILE D, BREDENBACH J, MARLARD M, VEILLARD M, SPENLEHAUER G: Fate of 14C radiolabeled poly(DL-lactic acid) nanoparticles following oral administration to rats. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. (1993) 1:233–239.
   Google Scholar
• SCHERER D, MOOREN FC, KINNE RK, KREUTER J: In vitro permeability of PBCA nanoparticles through porcine small intestine. I Drug Target. (1993) 1:21–27.
   Google Scholar
• EYLES JE, ALPAR HO, CONWAY BR, KESWICK M: Oral delivery and fate of poly(lactic acid) microsphere-encapsulated interferon in rats. I Phann. Pharinacol (1997) 49:669–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEMBRI A, MONTISCI MJ, GANTIER JC, CHACUN H, PONCHEL G: Targeting of 3'-azido 3'-deoxythymidine (AZT)-loaded poly(isohexylcyanoacrylate) nanospheres to the gastrointestinal mucosa and associated lymphoid tissues. Phann. Res. (2001) 18:467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MLADENOVSKA K, JANEVIK El, GLAVAS MD, KUMBARADZI EF, GORACINOVA K: Biodistribution of 131I-BSA loaded gelatin microspheres after peroral application to BALB/c mice-particle size study. Acta. Phann. (2003) 53:187–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LEFEVRE ME, JOEL DD: Intestinal absorption of particulate matter. Life Sci. (1977) 21:1403–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JANI PU, NOMURA T, YAMASHITA F, TAKAKURA Y, FLORENCE AT, HASHIDA M: Biliary excretion of polystyrene microspheres with covalently linked FITC fluorescence after oral and parenteral administration to male Wistar rats. I Drug Target. (1996) 4:87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TORCHE AM, JOUAN H, LE CORRE P et al.: Ex vivo and in situ PLGA microspheres uptake by pig ileal Peyer's patch segment. Int. I Pharin. (2000) 201:15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCHALE NG, THORNBURY KD: The effect of anesthetics on lymphatic contractility. Microvasc. Res. (1989) 37:70H76.
   Google Scholar
• TAKESHITA T, MORIO M, KAWAHARA M, FUJII K: Halothane-induced changes in contractions of mesenteric lymphatics of the rat. Lympbology (1988) 21: 128–130.
   Google Scholar
• TURNER SG, BARROWMAN JA: Intestinal lymph flow and lymphatic transport of protein during fat absorption. Q. J. Exp. Plysiol Cogn. Med. Sci. (1977) 62:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDWARDS GA, PORTER CJ, CALIPH SM, KHOO SM, CHARMAN WN: Animal models for the study of intestinal lymphatic drug transport. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (2001) 50:45–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POELMA FG, TUKKER JJ: Evaluation of a chronically isolated internal loop in the rat for the study of drug absorption kinetics. .1. Pbarm. Sci. (1987) 76:433–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEHR CM, BOUWSTRA JA, TUKKERJJ, JUNGINGER HE: Intestinal transit of bioadhesive microspheres in an in situ loop in the rat - A comparative study with copolymers and blends based on poly(acrylic acid). Control. Release. (1990) 13:51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GERDTS V, UWIERA RR, MUTWIRI GK et al.: Multiple intestinal 'loops' provide an in vivo model to analyse multiple mucosal immune responses. .1. Immunol Methods. (2001) 256: 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• MUTWIRI G, BOWERS OCK T, KIDANE A et al.: Induction of mucosal immune responses following enteric immunization with antigen delivered in alginate microspheres. Vet. Immunol Immunopathol (2002) 87:269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOOREN FC, BERTHOLD A, DOMSCHKE W, KREUTER J: Influence of chitosan microspheres on the transport of prednisolone sodium phosphate across HT-29 cell monolayers. Pbarm. Res. (1998) 15:58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAY AJ, GEE JM, DUPONT MS, JOHNSON IT, WILLIAMSON G: Absorption of quercetin-3-glucoside and quercetin-4'-glucoside in the rat small intestine: the role of lactase phlorizin hydrolase and the sodium-dependent glucose transporter. Biocitem. Pbarmacol. (2003) 65: 1199–1206.
   Google Scholar
• CHEN Y, PING Q, GUO J, LV W, GAO J: The absorption behavior of cyclosporin A lecithin vesicles in rat intestinal tissue. Int. J. Pbarm. (2003) 261:21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARRENO-GOMEZ B, WOODLEY JF, FLORENCE AT: Studies on the uptake of tomato lectin nanoparticles in everted gut sacs. Int. J. Pbarm. (1999) 183:7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANTOS CA, FREEDMAN BD, GHOSN S, JACOB JS, SCARPULLA M, MATHIOWITZ E: Evaluation of anhydride oligomers within polymer microsphere blends and their impact on bioadhesion and drug delivery M vitro. Biomaterials. (2003) 24:3571–3583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANTOS CA, JACOB JS, HERTZOG BA et al: Correlation of two bioadhesion assays: the everted sac technique and the CAHN microbalance. J. Control. Release. (1999) 61:113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUCROC R, HEYMAN M, BEAUFRERE B, MORGAT JL, DESJEUX JF: Horseradish perwddase transport across rabbit jejunum and Peyer's patches in vitro. Am. I Plysiol. (1983) 245:G54–G58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELJO DJ, HAMILTON JR: Quantitative determination of macromolecular transport rate across intestinal Peyer's patches. Am. J. Plysiol. (1983) 244:G637–G644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIETZONKA P, WALTER E, DUDA-JOHNER S, LANGGUTH P, MERKLE HP: Compromised integrity of excised porcine intestinal epithelium obtained from the abattoir affects the outcome of M vitro particle uptake studies. Eur. I Pbarm. Sci. (2002) 15:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN DER LUBBEN IM, VAN OPDORP FA, HENGEVELD MR et al: Transport of chitosan microparticles for mucosal vaccine delivery in a human intestinal M-cell model. Drug Target. (2002) 10:449–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAMGE C, MICHEL C, APRAHAMIAN M, COUVREUR P: New approach for oral administration of insulin with polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanocapsules as drug carrier. Diabetes. (1988) 37: 246–251.
   Google Scholar
• COURNARIE F, AUCHERE D, CHEVENNE D, LACOUR B, SEILLER M, VAUTHIER C: Absorption and efficiency of insulin after oral administration of insulin-loaded nanocapsules in diabetic rats. Int. J. Pbarm. (2002) 242:325–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HILLERY AM, TOTH I, FLORENCE AT: Co-polymerised peptide particles II: oral uptake of a novel co-polymeric nanoparticulate delivery system for peptides. Control. Release. (1996) 42:65H73.
   Google Scholar
• SIMECKA JVV: Mucosal immunity of the gastrointestinal tract and oral tolerance. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (1998) 34:235–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YAMAGUCHI K, ANDERSON JM: In vivo biocompatibility studies of medisorb® 65/35 D,L-lactideiglycolide copolymer microspheres. Control. Release. (1993) 24:81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KIM HK, PARK TG: Comparative study on sustained release of human growth hormone from semi-crystalline poly(-lactic acid) and amorphous poly(-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres: morphological effect on protein release. Control. Release (2004) 98: 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• PARK TG: Degradation of poly(-lactic acid) microspheres: effect of molecular weight. J. Control. Release. (1994) 30:161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARK TG: Degradation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres: effect of copolymer composition. Biomaterials (1995) 16: 1123–1130.
   Google Scholar
• LAVELLE EC, SHARIF S, THOMAS NW, HOLLAND J, DAVIS SS: The importance of gastrointestinal uptake of particles in the design of oral delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deify. Rev (1995) 18:5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JONES DH, MCBRIDE BW, THORNTON C, O'HAGAN DT, ROBINSON A, FARRAR GH: Orally administered microencapsulated Bordetella pertussis fimbriae protect mice from B. pertussis respiratory infection. Infect. Litman. (1996) 64:489–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHALLACOMBE SJ, RAHMAN D, O'HAGAN DT: Salivary, gut, vaginal and nasal antibody responses after oral immunization with biodegradable microparticles. Vaccine (1997) 15:169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOWERSOCK TL, HOGENESCH H, SUCKOW M et al: Oral vaccination with alginate microsphere systems. J. Control. Release (1996) 39:209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KIDANE A, GUIMOND P, JU TR, SANCHEZ M, GIBSON J, BOWERS OCK TL: The efficacy of oral vaccination of mice with alginate encapsulated outer membrane proteins of pasteurella haemolytica and one-shot. Vaccine. (2001) 19:2637–2646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ERMAK TH, DOUGHERTY EP, BHAGAT HR, KABOK Z, PAPPO J: Uptake and transport of copolymer biodegradable microspheres by rabbit Peyer's patch M cells. Cell Tissue Res. (1995) 279:433–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TABATA Y, INOUE Y, IKADA Y: Size effect on systemic and mucosal immune responses induced by oral administration of biodegradable microspheres. Vaccine (1996) 14:1677–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JUNG T, KAMM W, BREITENBACH A, HUNGERERKD, HUNDT E, KISSEL T: Tetanus toxoid loaded nanoparticles from sulfobutylated poly(vinyl alcohol)-graft-poly(lactide-co-glycolide): evaluation of antibody response after oral and nasal application in mice. Pliann. Res. (2001) 18:352–360.
   Google Scholar
• KATZ DE, DELORIMIER AJ, WOLF MK et al: Oral immunization of adult volunteers with microencapsulated enterotwdgenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) C56 antigen. Vaccine. (2003) 21:341–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUTIERRO I, HERNANDEZ RM, IGARTUA M, GASCON AR, PEDRAZ JL: Size dependent immune response after subcutaneous, oral and intranasal administration of BSA loaded nanospheres. Vaccine. (2002) 21:67–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REN JM, ZOU QM, WANG FK, HE Q, CHEN W, ZEN WK: PELA microspheres loaded H pylori lysates and their mucosal immune response. World J. Gastroenterology (2002) 8:1098–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar