Adhesive properties: a critical issue in transdermal patch development

Bibliography

• Patches, transdermal. In European Pharmacopoeia, 7th edition 2011 Strasbourg, accessed online on March 28, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Semi-solid preparations for cutaneous application. In European Pharmacopoeia, 7th Edition 2011, Strasbourg, accessed online on March 28, 2011
   Google Scholar
• General rules for preparations - 20. Plasters and pressure sensitive adhesive tapes. In Japanese Pharmacopeia XV Ed, 2006, accessed online on June 26, 2011
   Google Scholar
• General rules for preparations - 28. Transdermal Systems In Japanese Pharmacopeia XV Ed, 2006, accessed online on June 26, 2011
   Google Scholar
• General chapter < 1151 > Pharmaceutical dosage forms - Transdermal systems. In USP34-NF29, 2011 accessed online on March 28, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Prodduturi S, Sadrieh N, Wokovich AM, Transdermal delivery of fentanyl from matrix and reservoir systems: effect of heat and compromised skin. J Pharm Sci 2010;99(1):2357-66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohn CL. Rheology of pressure sensitive adhesives. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology. Satas & Associates; Warwick: 1999. p. 153-70
   Google Scholar
• Ho KY, Dodou K. Rheological studies on pressure-sensitive silicone adhesives and drug-in-adhesive layers as a means to characterise adhesive performance. Int J Pharm 2007;333:24-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satas D. Tack. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology. Satas & Associates; Warwick: 1999. p. 36-61
   Google Scholar
• Maillard-Salin DG, Becourt P, Couarraze G. Physical evaluation of a new patch made of a progestomimetic in a silicone matrix. Int J Pharm 2000;199(1):29-38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demarteau W, Loutz JM. Rheology of acrylic dispersions for pressure sensitive adhesives. Prog Org Coat 1996;27:33-44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond FH. Tack. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology II. Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York: 1989. p. 38-60
   Google Scholar
• Ginn ME, Noyes CM, Jungermann E. The contact angle of water on viable human skin. J Colloid Interface Sci 1968;26:146-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney JF, Haddok TH, Sun RL, Parreira HC. Medical-grade acrylic adhesives for skin contact. J Appl Polym Sci 1992;45:355-61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A. Measuring adhesive performance in transdermal delivery systems. Am J Drug Deliv 2004;2(3):193-206
   Google Scholar
• Dalhquist CA. Creep. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology III. Satas & Associates; Warwick: 1999. p. 121-38
   Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, Montanari L. The effect of thickness and water content on the adhesive properties of methacrylic patches. Acta Tech Legis Med Xi 2000;2:81-92
   Google Scholar
• Rajeckas V. Bond strength and its prognosis. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology II. Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York: 1989. p. 115-57
   Google Scholar
• Johnston J. Physical testing of pressure-sensitive adhesive systems. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KI, editors. Handbook of adhesive technology. Marcel Dekker Inc.; New York: 1994. p. 93-112
   Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Casiraghi A, Cilurzo F, Montanari L. Development of local patches containing melilot extract and ex vivo–in vivo evaluation of skin permeation. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;10(2):111-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satas D. Peel. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology III. Satas & Associates; Warwick: 1999. p. 62-86
   Google Scholar
• Steven-Fountain AJ, Atkins AG, Jeronimidis G, The effect of flexible substrates on pressure-sensitive adhesive performance. Int J Adhes Adhes 2002;22:423-30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimas DA, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM, Choulis NH. Effect of several factors on the mechanical properties of pressure sensitive adhesives used in transdermal therapeutic systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 2000;1(2):article 16
   Google Scholar
• Kyriazanou AM, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM, Effect of several factors on the mechanical properties of a pressure sensitive adhesive containing penetration enhancers. STP Pharm Sci 2002;12(5):283-6
   Google Scholar
• Sheout WH, Day NH. Natural rubber adhesive plaster (tape). US3965; 1845
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman S, Gale R. Skin adhesives and skin adhesion. 1. Transdermal drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 1998;19(13):1119-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Deng L, Zhao M, Pressure sensitive properties of poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)/D.L lactic acid oligomers/glycerol/water blend for TDDS. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010;21:1-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu Z, Du H, A novel hydrophilic adhesive matrix with self-enhancement fordrug percutaneous permeation through rat skin. Pharm Res 2010;26:1398-406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Minghetti P, Gennari CGM, A novel polymethylmethacrylate hydrophilic adhesive matrix intended for transdermal patch formulations. Drug Deliv 2010;17(3):171-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padula C, Colombo G, Nicoli S, Bioadhesive film for the transdermal delivery of lidocaine: in vitro and in vivo behavior. J Control Release 2003;88(2):277-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart J, Chandrasekaran SK, Shaw JE. Bandage for transdermally administering scopolamine to prevent nausea. US4031894; 1977
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JJ, Jagisch FC, Stucker NE. Butyl rubber and poly-isobutylene. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology II. Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York: 1989. p. 374-95
   Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Liberti V, Montanari L. Dermal therapeutic systems permeable to water vapour. Int J Pharm 1997;158(2):165-72
   Google Scholar
• Casiraghi A, Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Occlusive properties of monolayer patches: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Pharm Res 2002;19(4):423-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auchter G, Aydin O, Zettl A, Satas D. Acrylic adhesives. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology III. Satas & Associates; Warwick: 1999. p. 396-456
   Google Scholar
• Toddywala RD, Ulman K, Walters P, Chien YW. Effect of physicochemical properties of adhesive on the release, skin permeation and adhesiveness of adhesive-type transdermal drug delivery systems (a-TDD) containing silicone-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. Int J Pharm 1991;76(1-2):77-89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas X, Pfister WR. The emerging role of silicones used in transdermal drug delivery systems. STP Pharm Sci 1991;1:38-46
   Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Pagani S, Formulation study of oxybutynin patches. Pharm Dev Technol 2007;12(3):239-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulman KL, Li CL. Drug permeability of modified silicon polymers. III hydrophilic pressure snsitive adesive for transdermal controlled drug release applications. J Control Release 1989;10(3):273-81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Tosi L. Transdermal patches having a siliconic adhesive matrix stabilized with methacrylic copolymers. WO03086370; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Minghetti P, Casiraghi A, Polymethacrylates as crystallization inhibitors in monolayer transdermal patches containing ibuprofen. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005;60(1):61-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu W, Zhao Y, Preparation and characterization of PEG-modified polyurethane pressure-sensitive adhesives for transdermal drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35(6):704-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldstein MM, Tohmakhchi VN, Malkhazov LB, Hydrophilic polymeric matrices for enhanced transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 1996;131(2):229-42
   Google Scholar
• Lin S, Lee C, Lin Y. Drug-polymer interaction affecting the mechanical properties, adhesion strength and release kinetics of piroxicam-loaded Eudragit E films plasticized with different plasticizers. J Control Release 1995;33:375-81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Sosa S, Cilurzo F, Evaluation of the topical anti-inflammatory activity of ginger dry extracts from solutions and plasters. Planta Med 2007;73(15):1525-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, Development of patches for the controlled release of dehydroepiandrosterone. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2001;27(7):711-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Tosi L, Design of a new water-soluble pressure-sensitive adhesive for patch preparation. AAPS PharmSciTech 2003;4(1):53-61
   Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Minghetti P, Pagani S, Design and Characterization of an Adhesive Matrix Based on a Poly(Ethyl Acrylate, Methyl Methacrylate). AAPS PharmSciTech 2008;9(3):748-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenta C, Walzer A, Clausen AE, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Thiolated polymers: development and evaluation of transdermal delivery systems for progesterone. Pharm Res 2001;18(2):211-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satas D. Medical products. In: Satas D, editor. Handbook of Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Technology III. Satas & Associates; Warwick: 1999. p. 706-23
   Google Scholar
• Onuki Y, Hoshi M, Okabe H, Formulation optimization of photocrosslinked polyacrylic acid modified with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate hydrogel as an adhesive for a dermatological patch. J Control Release 2005;108(2-3):331-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa M, Onuki Y, Isowa K, Takayama K. Formulation optimization of an indomethacin-containing photocrosslinked polyacrylic acid hydrogel as an anti-inflammatory patch. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008;9(3):1038-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien TY, Wu SJ, Gong SJ, Transdermal contraceptive delivery system: preclinical development and clinical assessment. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1994;20(4):633-64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skin irritation and sensitization testing of generic transdermal drug product, Guidance for Industry. FDA. FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; Washington, DC: 1999
   Google Scholar
• Kotiyan PN, Vavia PR. Eudragits: role as crystallization inhibitors in drug-in-adhesive transdermal systems of estradiol. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011;52(2):173-80
   Google Scholar
• Karwoski AC, Plaut RH. Experiments on peeling adhesive tapes from human forearms. Skin Res Technol 2004;10(4):271-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer-Fernandez C, Padula C, Femenia-Font A, Development and evaluation of occlusive systems employing polyvinyl alcohol for transdermal delivery of sumatriptan succinate. Drug Deliv 2010;17(2):83-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Cervantes M, Escobar-Chavez JJ, Casas-Alancaster N, Development and characterization of a transdermal patch and an emulgel containing kanamycin intended to be used in the treatment of mycetoma caused by Actinomadura madurae. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35(12):1511-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynaud JP, Auges M, Liorzou L, Adhesiveness of a new testosterone-in-adhesive matrix patch after extreme conditions. Int J Pharm 2009;375(1-2):28-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renvoise J, Burlot D, Marin G, Derail C. Peeling of PSAs on viscoelastic substrates: a failure criterion. J Adhes 2007;83(4):403-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauth C, Wiedersberg S, Neubert RHH, Dittgen M. Adhesive backing foil interactions affecting the elasticity, adhesion strength of laminates, and how to interpret these properties of branded transdermal patches. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2002;28(10):1251-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Montanari L. Evaluation of adhesive properties of patches based on acrylic matrices. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25(1):1-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillard-Salin DG, Becourt P, Couarraze G. A study of the adhesive-skin interface: correlation between adhesion and passage of a drug. Int J Pharm 2000;200:121-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wokovich AM, Brown SA, McMaster FJ, Evaluation of substrates for 90° peel adhesion - a collaborative study. I. Medical tapes. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87(1):105-13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wokovich AM, Brown SA, Shen M, Evaluation of substrates for 90° peel adhesion - a collaborative study. II. Transdermal drug delivery systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88(1):61-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diridollou S, Patat F, Gens F, In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction. Skin Res Technol 2000;6:214-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders R. Torsional elasticity of human skin in vivo. Pflugers Arch 1973;342:255-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugihara T, Ohura T, Homma K, Igawa HH. The extensibility in human skin: variation according to age and site. Br J Plast Surg 1991;44:418-22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pailler-Mattei C, Bec S, Zahouani H. In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests. Med Eng Phys 2008;30(5):599-606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvoise J, Burlot D, Marin G, Derail C. Adherence performances of pressure sensitive adhesives on a model viscoelastic synthetic film: a tool for the understanding of adhesion on the human skin. Int J Pharm 2009;368:83-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut RH. Two-dimensional analysis of peeling adhesive tape from human skin. J Adhes 2010;86(11):1086-110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut RH. Peeling pressure-sensitive adhesive tape from thin elastic strip. J Adhes 2010;86(7):675-97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lir I, Haber M, Dodiuk-Kenig H. Skin surface model material as a substrate for adhesion-to-skin testing. J Adhes Sci Technol 2007;21(15):1497-512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal A, Nussinovitch A. Plasticizers in the manufacture of novel skin-bioadhesive patches. Int J Pharm 2009;370(1-2):103-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bait N, Grassl B, Derail C, Benaboura A. Hydrogel nanocomposites as pressure-sensitive adhesives for skin-skin contact applications. Soft Matter 2011;7(5):2025-32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers RA. Easy removal of pressure sensitive adhesives for skin applications. Int J Adhes Adhes 2001;21(5):381-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahouani H, Pailler-Mattei C, Sohm B, Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static fiction tests. Skin Res Technol 2009;15:68-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutschke E, Bracht S, Nagel S, Weitschies W. Adhesion testing of transdermal matrix patches with a probe tack test - In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;75(3):399-404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullick DR, Pugh WJ, Ingram MJ, Formulation and characterization of a captopril ethyl ester drug-in-adhesive-type patch for percutaneous absorption. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36(8):926-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minghetti P, Cilurzo F, Casiraghi A, Montanari L. Application of viscometry and solubility parameters in miconazole patches development. Int J Pharm 1999;190:91-101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hai NT, Kim J, Park ES, Chi SC. Formulation and biopharmaceutical evaluation of transdermal patch containing benztropine. Int J Pharm 2008;357(1-2):55-60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin SY, Lee CJ, Lin YY. The effect of plasticizers on compatibility, mechanical properties, and adhesion strength of drug-free Eudragit E films. Pharm Res 1991;8(9):1137-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu MT, Chen LC, Ho HO. Simultaneous optimization of percutaneous delivery and adhesion for ketoprofen poultice. Int J Pharm 2002;233(1-2):257-62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elgindy N, Samy W. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and drug release of cross-linked Eudragit films containing metronidazole. Int J Pharm 2009;376(1-2):1-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko CU. Effect of skin penetration enhancers in transdermal drug delivery adhesives on skin adhesion and irritation. Int Symptom Control Rel Bio Mater 1996;23:281-2
   Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh A, Ghahremani MH, Rouini MR, Toliyat T. Effects of pressure sensitive adhesives and chemical permeation enhancers on the permeability of fentanyl through excised rat skin. Acta Pharm 2006;56:219-29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taghizadeh SM, Lahootifard F. Transdermal excipients effect on adhesion strength of a pressure sensitive adhesive. Iran Polym J 2003;12(3):243-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenor SR, Suggs AE, Love BJ. Influence of penetration enhancers on the thermomechanical properties and peel strength of a poly(isobutylene) pressure sensitive adhesive. J Mater Sci Lett 2002;21:1321-3
   Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Alberti E, Minghetti P, Effect of drug chirality on the skin permeability of ibuprofen. Int J Pharm 2010;386(1-2):71-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipp R, Muller-Fahrnow A. Use of X-ray crystallography for the characterization of single crystals grown in steroid containig transdermal drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1999;47(2):133-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Choi HK. Effect of additives on the crystallization and the permeation of ketoprofen from adhesive matrix. Int J Pharm 2002;236(1-2):81-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Taw J, Chiang CM. Control of drug crystallization in transdermal matrix system. Int J Pharm 1996;142(1):115-19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurad B, Tack J, Lipp R. Evaluation of the transdermal permeation behaviour of proterguride from drug in adhesive matrix patches through hairless mouse skin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005;31:505-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh SM, Soroushnia A, Mirzadeh H, Barikani M. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of new fentanyl patch based on acrylic/silicone pressure sensitive adhesive blends. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35:487-98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wokovich AM, Prodduturi S, Doub WH, Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) adhesion as a critical safety, efficacy and quality attribute. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006;64(1):1-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz J, Nardin M. Theories and mechanisms of adhesion. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KI, editors. Handbook of adhesive technology. Marcel Dekker Inc.; New York: 1994. p. 19-33
   Google Scholar
• Adhesiveness, British Pharmacopeia 1993. Appendix XXH, p A217-A218
   Google Scholar
• Cerotti. Farmacopea Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana IX Ed. 1985, p. 401-8.
   Google Scholar