Scintillation proximity assay in lead discovery

Bibliography

• Hart HE, Greenwald EB. Scintillation Proximity Assay (SPA) of antigen-antibody binding kinetics. J Nucl Med 1978;19:681
   Google Scholar
• Hart HE, Greenwald EB. Scintillation Proximity Assay of antigen-antibody kinetics: concise communication. J Nucl Med 1979;20:1062-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart HE, Greenwald EB. Scintillation Proximity Assay (SPA) – a new method of immunoassay -direct and inhibition mode detection with human albumin and rabbit antihuman albumin. Mol Immunol 1979;16:265-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart H. Energy-emitting latex-particulates. US4388296; 1983
   Google Scholar
• Kirk G, Gruner S. Encapsulated scintillators monitor 3H-solute concentrations. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1982;N5–29:769-72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruner SM, Kirk G, Patel L, et al. A method for rapid, continuous monitoring of solute uptake and binding. Biochemistry 1982;21(13):3239-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udenfriend S, Gerber LD, Brink L, et al. Scintillation proximity radioimmunoassay utilizing 125I-labeled ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82(24):8672-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udenfriend S, Gerber L, Nelson N. Scintillation proximity assay: a sensitive and continuous isotopic method for monitoring ligand/receptor and antigen/antibody interactions. Anal Biochem 1987;161(2):494-500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson N. A novel method for the detection of receptors and membrane proteins by scintillation proximity radioassay. Anal Biochem 1987;165:287-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park YW, Garyantes T, Cummings RT. Optimization of 33P Scintillation Proximity Assays Using Cesium Chloride Bead Suspension. TopCount topics TCA030
   Google Scholar
• Bryant R, McGuiness D, Turek-Etienne T, et al. WGA-coated yttrium oxide beads enable an imaging-based adenosine 2a receptor binding scintillation proximity assay suitable for high throughput screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2004;2:290-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobel J, Saussy DL, Goetz AS. Development of scintillation-proximity assays for alpha adrenoceptors. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1999;42(4):237-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Hanniford D, Doucette C, et al. Development of homogeneous high-affinity agonist binding assays for 5-HT2 receptor subtypes. Assay Drug Dev Tech 2005;3(6):649-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise CE, Sullivan SK, Crowe PD. Scintillation proximity assay as a high-throughput method to identify slowly dissociating nonpeptide ligand binding to the GnRH receptor. J Biomol Screen 2007;12(2):235-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon M, Page K, Uings IJ, et al. An interleukin 5 mutant distinguishes between two functional responses in human eosinophils. J Exp Med 1997;186(1):121-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawaja XZ. Development of a scintillation proximity assay for human insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 compatible with inhibitor high-throughput screening. Anal Biochem 2007;366(1):80-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freissmuth M, Casey PJ, Gilman AG. G proteins control diverse pathways of transmembrane signaling. FASEB J 1989;3(10):2125-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCudden CR, Hains MD, Kimple RJ, et al. G-protein signaling: back to the future. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005;62(5):551-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison C, Traynor JR. The [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay: approaches and applications in pharmacology. Life Sci 2003;74(4):489-508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange PG. Mechanisms underlying agonist efficacy. Biochem Soc Trans 2007;35:733-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson EN, Shi X, Cassaday J, et al. A 1,536-well [35S]GTPγS scintillation proximity binding assay for ultra-high-throughput screening of an orphan Gαi-coupled GPCR. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2008;6(3):327-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson J, Selkirk JV, Brown AM. Development of FlashPlate® technology to measure (35S) GTP gamma S binding to Chinese hamster ovary cell membranes expressing the cloned human 5-HT1B receptor. J Biomol Screen 1998;3(2):101-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso ME, Jenna S, Beaulne S, et al. Biochemical clustering of monomeric GTPases of the Ras superfamily. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005;4(7):936-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delapp NW, McKinzie JH, Sawyer BD, et al. Determination of [35S]guanosine- 5′-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding mediated by cholinergic muscarinic receptors in membranes from Chinese hamster ovary cells and rat striatum using an anti-G protein scintillation proximity assay. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;289(2):946-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delapp NW. The antibody-capture [(35)S]GTPgammaS scintillation proximity assay: a powerful emerging technique for analysis of GPCR pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004;25(8):400-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer M, Kolodin GD, Zuck P, et al. A fully automated [35S]GTPgammaS scintillation proximity assay for the high-throughput screening of Gi-linked G protein-coupled receptors. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2003;1(2):261-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis DS, La Cour CM, Chaput C, et al. Actions of novel agonists, antagonists and antipsychotic agents at recombinant rat 5-HT(6) receptors: a comparative study of coupling to Galphas. Eur J Pharmacol 2008;588(2-3):170-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannoury La Cour C, Vidal S, Pasteau V, et al. Dopamine D1 receptor coupling to Gs/olf and Gq in rat striatum and cortex: a scintillation proximity assay (SPA)/antibody-capture characterization of benzazepine agonists. Neuropharmacology 2007;52(3):1003-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mereghetti I, Cagnotto A, Mennini T. Dimethyl sulfoxide: an antagonist in scintillation proximity assay [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding to rat 5-HT(6) receptor cloned in HEK-293 cells? J Neurosci Methods 2007;160(2):251-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson SA, Yalow RS. General principles of radioimmunoassay (1968). Clin Chim Acta 2006;369(2):125-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikoshiba K. IP3 receptor/Ca2+ channel: from discovery to new signaling concepts. J Neurochem 2007;102(5):1426-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JJ, Hartman DS, Bostwick JR. An immobilized metal ion affinity adsorption and scintillation proximity assay for receptor-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis. Anal Biochem 2003;318(1):91-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald OB, Chen WJ, Ellis B, et al. A scintillation proximity assay for the Raf/MEK/ERK kinase cascade: high-throughput screening and identification of selective enzyme inhibitors. Anal Biochem 1999;268(2):318-29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge M, Park YW, Hermes J, et al. Detection of p56(lck) kinase activity using scintillation proximity assay in 384-well format and imaging proximity assay in 384- and 1536-well format. J Biomol Screen 2000;5:205-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorg G, Schubert HD, Büttner FH, et al. Automated high throughput screening for serine kinase inhibitors using a LEADseeker scintillation proximity assay in the 1536-well format. J Biomol Screen 2002;7(1):11-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch AS, Du Q. Methods to identify and characterize inhibitors of bacterial RNA polymerase. Methods Mol Med 2008;142:37-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Y, Triantafyllou I, Cable M, et al. High-throughput assays for yeast RNA 5′ triphosphatase (Cet1p). Anal Biochem 2008;372(1):89-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagrost L, Loreau N, Gambert P, et al. Immunospecific scintillation proximity assay of cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity. Clin Chem 1995;41(6):914-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman JF, Schmid A. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase: real-time kinetics and inhibition by nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates in a scintillation assay. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2007;5:205-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birzin ET, Rohrer SP. High-throughput receptor-binding methods for somatostatin receptor 2. Anal Biochem 2002;307(1):159-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann C, Gelius B, Danielsson J, et al. Scintillation proximity assay for measuring uptake by the human drug transporters hOCT1, hOAT3, and hOATP1B1. Anal Biochem 2007;366(2):117-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith L, Price-Jones M, Hughes K, et al. Effects of topiramate on kainate- and domoate-activated [14C]guanidinium ion flux through GluR6 channels in transfected BHK cells using Cytostar-T scintillating microplates. Epilepsia 2000;41(Suppl 1):S48-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing A, Price-Jones MJ, Graves R, et al. Measurement of calcium flux through ionotropic glutamate receptors using Cytostar-T scintillating microplates. J Neurosci Methods 1999;90(1):33-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde V, Flodgaard H, Kastrup JS, et al. Measurement of apoptosis by the TUNEL method using scintillating microplates. Anal Biochem 2000;280(1):186-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockinger W, Castoreno AB, Wang Y, et al. Real-time analysis of endosomal lipid transport by live cell scintillation proximity assay. J Lipid Res 2004;45:2151-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye L, Haupt K. Molecularly imprinted polymers as antibody and receptor mimics for assays, sensors and drug discovery. Anal Bioanal Chem 2004;378(8):1887-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nostrum CF. Polymeric micelles to deliver photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;56(1):9-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbone DL. Molecularly imprinted polymers in the drug discovery process. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57(12):1854-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor NA, Paisner DA, Huryn D, et al. Screening of 5-HT1A receptor antagonists using molecularly imprinted polymers. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129(6):1680-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye L, Surugiu I, Haupt K. Scintillation proximity assay using molecularly imprinted microspheres. Anal Chem 2002;74(5):959-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Toufaili FA, Visnjevski A, Brüggemann O. Screening combinatorial libraries of molecularly imprinted polymer films casted on membranes in single-use membrane modules. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2004;804(1):135-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RL, Stanley TB, Hazen R, et al. Small molecule modulators of HIV Rev/Rev response element interaction identified by random screening. Antiviral Res 2002;54(3):149-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culliford SJ, McCauley P, Sutherland AJ, et al. A novel cell-based scintillation proximity assay for studying protein function and activity in vitro using membrane-soluble scintillants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;296(4):857-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCairn MC, Sutherland AJ. Scintillation proximity assays for the real-time detection and quantification of the progress of reactions upon solid supports. Chem Commun (Camb) 2004;3:296-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen M, Reeves J, Mellor G. High throughput fluorescence polarization: a homogeneous alternative to radioligand binding for cell surface receptors. J Biomol Screen 2000;5(2):63-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne A, Banks P, Hurt SD. Use of fluorescence polarization detection for the measurement of fluopeptidetm binding to G protein-coupled receptors. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2002;22(1-4):333-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JW, Greene TA, Grygon CA, et al. Cell-free assay of g-protein-coupled receptors using fluorescence polarization. J Biomol Screen 2008;13(5):424-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley RH, Hudson CC, Cruickshank RD, et al. The cellular distribution of fluorescently labeled arrestins provides a robust, sensitive, and universal assay for screening G protein-coupled receptors. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2002;1(1):21-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garippa RJ, Hoffman AF, Gradl G, et al. High-throughput confocal microscopy for beta-arrestin-green fluorescent protein translocation G protein-coupled receptor assays using the Evotec Opera. Methods Enzymol 2006;414:99-120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostenis E. Is Galpha16 the optimal tool for fishing ligands of orphan G-protein-coupled receptors? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001;22(11):560-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boute N, Jockers R, Issad T. The use of resonance energy transfer in high-throughput screening: BRET versus FRET. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2002;23(8):351-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan G. Applications of bioluminescence- and fluorescence resonance energy transfer to drug discovery at G protein-coupled receptors. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004;21(4):397-405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacart J, Corbel C, Jockers R, et al. The BRET technology and its application to screening assays. Biotechnol J 2008;3(3):311-24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikiforov TT, Simeonov AM. Application of fluorescence polarization to enzyme assays and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping: some recent developments. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2003;6(3):201-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudet EA, Huang KS, Zhang Y, et al. A homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay adaptable for a range of protein serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases. J Biomol Screen 2003;8(2):164-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra P, Nanda K, Chatterjee M, et al. An improved zinc cocktail-mediated fluorescence polarization-based kinase assay for high-throughput screening of kinase inhibitors. Anal Biochem 2008;380(1):143-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmi N, Wingfield JM, Yazawa H, et al. Development of a homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence assay for high throughput screening to identify Lck inhibitors: comparison with scintillation proximity assay and streptavidin-coated plate assay. J Biomol Screen 2000;5(6):463-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive DM. Quantitative methods for the analysis of protein phosphorylation in drug development. Expert Rev Proteomics 2004;1(3):327-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner G, Illy C, Pedro L, et al. AlphaScreen kinase HTS platforms. Curr Med Chem 2004;11(6):721-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenat S, Rouleau N, Bielmann C, et al. Homogeneous and nonradioactive high-throughput screening platform for the characterization of kinase inhibitors in cell lysates. J Biomol Screen 2006;11(8):1015-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohiro Y, Arai R, Ueda H, et al. A homogeneous and noncompetitive immunoassay based on the enhanced fluorescence resonance energy transfer by leucine zipper interaction. Anal Chem 2002;74(22):5786-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Ahsen O, Schmidt A, Klotz M, et al. Assay concordance between SPA and TR-FRET in high-throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 2006;11(6):606-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting AY, Kain KH, Klemke RL, et al. Genetically encoded fluorescent reporters of protein tyrosine kinase activities in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98(26):15003-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar