Agamospermy is much more common than conceived: A hypothesis

References

• Chapman, H.M., Parh, D., Oraguzie, N. 2000. Genetic structure and colonizing success of a clonal, weedy species, Pilosella officinarum (Asteraceae). Heredity 84: 401-409.
   Google Scholar
• Asker, S., Jerling, L. 1992. Apomixis in plants. CRC Press, Roca Raton.
   Google Scholar
• Bertasso-Borges, M.S., Coleman, J.R. 1998. Embryology and cytogenetics of Eupatorium pauciflorum and E. intermedium (Compositae). Genet. Mol. Biol. 21: 507-514.
   Google Scholar
• Bierzychudek, P. 1989. Environmental sensitivity of sexual and apomictic Antennaria: do apomicts have general-purpose genotypes? Evolution 43: 1456-1466.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C.S. 1998. Hybridization and the evolution of agamic complexes. In: van Raamsdonk, L.W.D., den Nijs, H.C.M, eds. Plant evolution in man-made habitats. IOPB VIIth International Symposium, Amsterdam, pp. 41-42 (abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Kashin, A.S. 1999. Gametophytic agamospermy and problem of genomic chromosome imbalance in Angiosperms. Russ. J. Genet. 35: 890-900.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, M.L.H., Bahn, A.K. 1977. Cytogenetics of polyploids. VI. Cytology of tetraploid and hexaploid Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. Cytologia 42: 125-136.
   Google Scholar
• Maletskii, S.I., Maletskaya, E.I. 1996. Self-fertility and agamospermy in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. Genetika 32: 1643-1650 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Ramming, D.W., Hinrichs, A.H., Richardson, P.E. 1973. Sequential staining of callose by aniline blue and lacmoid for fluorescence and regular microscopy on a durable preparation of same specimen. Stain Technol. 48: 133-134.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A.J. 1996. Breeding systems in flowering plants and the control of Variability. In: Richards, A.J., Kirschner, J., Stepanek, J., Marhold, K., eds. Apomixis and Taxonomy, Opulus Press, Uppsala, pp. 9-19 [Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 31: 283-293].
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A.J. 1997. Plant breeding systems, 2nd ed. Allen and Unwin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, D., Hanna, W.W., Ozias-Akins, P. 2001. Is supernumerary chromatin involved in gametophytic apomixis of polyploid plants? Sex. Plant Reprod. 13: 343-349.
   Google Scholar
• Asker, S. 1979. Progress in apomixis research. Hereditas 91: 231-240.
   Google Scholar
• Ellstrand, N.C., Whitkus, R., Rieseberg, L.H. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93: 5090-5093.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, D., van Damme, J. 2000. Apomixis technology and the paradox of sex. Trends Plant Sci. 5: 81-84.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Aguilar, M., Piementa-Barrios, E. 1996. Cytological evidences of agamospermy in Opuntia (Cactaceae). Haseltonia 4: 39-42.
   Google Scholar
• Holzner, W., Numata, M. 1982. Biology and ecology of weeds. Dr W. Junk, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• May, R.M. 1985. Host-parasite associations: their population biology and population genetics. In: Rollinson, D., Anderson, R.M., eds. Ecology and genetics of host-parasite interactions. The Linnean Society, London, pp. 243-263.
   Google Scholar
• Kashin, A.S. 1998. Sexual reproduction, agamospermy and species formation in Angiosperms. Zh. Obshch. Biol. 59: 171-191 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Negron-Ortiz, V. 1998. Reproductive biology of a rare cactus, Opuntia spinosissima (Cactaceae), in Florida Keys: why is seed set very low? Sex. Plant Reprod. 11: 208-212.
   Google Scholar
• Neiland, M.R.M., Wilcock, C.C. 1998. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae. Am. J. Bot. 85: 1657-1671.
   Google Scholar
• Plitmann, U., Levin, D.A. 1996. Breeding systems in the Polemoniaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 170: 205-214.
   Google Scholar
• Plitmann, U., Yoel, D. 1998. Apomixis as an alternative reproductive strategy in parasitic higher plants. In: van Raamsdonk, L.W.D., den Nijs, H.C.M, eds. Plant evolution in man-made habitats. IOPB VIIth International Symposium, Amsterdam, p. 46 (abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, 1967. Apomixis in the Compositae. Phytomorphology 17: 270-277.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, R.D. 2000. Biogeographical and evolutionary insights on Erigeron and allies (Asteraceae) from ITS sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 220: 93-114.
   Google Scholar
• Czapik, R. 1996. Problems of apomictic reproduction in the families Compositae and Rosaceae. Folia Geobot. Phyto-taxon. 31: 381-387.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, A. 1967. Apomixis in Angiosperms. Handb. Der Pflanzenphysiol. 18: 551-596.
   Google Scholar
• Pazy, B. 1998. Diploidization failure and apomixis in Orobanchaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.128: 99-103.
   Google Scholar
• Pazy, B., Plitmann, U. 1994. Holocentric chromosome behaviour in Cuscuta (Cuscutaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 191: 105-109.
   Google Scholar
• Pianka, E.R. 1978. Evolutionary Ecology, 2nd ed. Harper and Row, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Plitmann, U. 1991. Reproductive adaptations of parasitic higher plants: the case of Cuscuta. Flora Veget. Mundi 9: 133-144.
   Google Scholar
• Matzk, F., Meister, A., Schubert, I. 2000. An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of momocots and dicots. Plant J. 21: 97-108.
   Google Scholar
• Mogie, M. 1992. The evolution of asexual reproduction in Plants. Chapman & Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Price, P.W. 1980. Evolutionary biology of parasites. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar