Augmenting Population Monitoring Programs with Behavioral Indicators During Ecological Restorations

References

• Kotler, B. P., Brown, J. S., Knight, M. H. 1999. Habitat and patch use by hyraxes: there's no place like home? Ecology Letters 2: 82-88.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, S. L. 1992. Vigilance and foraging substrate: anti-predatory consideration in a non-standard environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30: 283-289.
   Google Scholar
• Oyugi, J. O. 2005. Community ecology and conservation of the Amani sunbird in Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Oyugi, J. O., Brown, J. S. 2003. Giving-up densities and habitat preferences of European starlings and American robins. Condor 105: 130-135.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, A., Stenberg, M. 2006. Linking patch-use behavior, resource density, and growth expectations in fish. Ecology 87: 1953-1959.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, M. A., Breland, B. 1996. Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban-rural gradient: use of the GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecological Applications 6: 1135-1142.
   Google Scholar
• Brawn, J. D., Robinson, S. K. 1996. Source-sink population dynamics may complicate the interpretation of long-term census data. Ecology 77: 3-12.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22: 37-47.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecology Letters 7: 999-014
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P. 2007. Foraging and the ecology of fear. In: Stephens, D. W., Brown, J. S., Ydenberg, R. C., eds. Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Morgan, R. A., Dow, B. D. 1992. Patch use under predation risk. 2. A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger. Annales Zoologici Fennici 29: 311-318.
   Google Scholar
• Caro, T. 1998. Behavioral ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, R. C., Sillett, T. S., Rodenhouse, N. L., Holmes, R. T. 2007. Population density affects foraging behavior of male black-throated blue warblers during the breeding season. Journal of Field Ornithology 78: 133-139.
   Google Scholar
• Druce, D. J., Brown, J. S., Castley, J. G., Kerley, G. I. H., Kotler, B. P., Slotow, R., Knight, M. H. 2006. Scale-dependent foraging costs: habitat use by rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) determined using giving-up densities. Oikos 115: 513-525.
   Google Scholar
• Gawlik, D. E. 2002. The effects of prey availability on the numerical response of wading birds. Ecological Monographs 72: 329-346.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. P., Wenny, D. G. 1993. Song output as a population estimator—effect of male pairing status. Journal of Field Ornithology 64: 316-322.
   Google Scholar
• Herkert, J. J. 1995. Analysis of midwestern breeding bird population trends— 1966-1993. American Midland Naturalist 134: 41-50.
   Google Scholar
• Herkert, J. J. 1997a. Population trends of the Henslow's sparrow in relation to the conservation reserve program in Illinois, 1975-1995. Journal of Field Ornithology 68: 235-244.
   Google Scholar
• Herkert, J. J. 1997b. Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus population decline in agricultura landscapes in the midwestern USA. Biological Conservation 80: 107-112.
   Google Scholar
• Hochman, V., Kotler, B. P. 2006. Effects of food quality, diet preference and water on patch use by Nubian ibex. Oikos 112: 547-554.
   Google Scholar
• Jedlicka, D. M. 1993. A foraging approach to habitat selection in time and space in three Sciurid rodents. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, A. 2002. Applying optimal foraging theory to assess nutrient availability ratios for ants. Ecology 83: 1935-1944.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, A. M. 2003. The impact of thermoregulatory costs on foraging behaviour: a test with American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) and eastern grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis). Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 781-786.
   Google Scholar
• Korb, J., Linsenmair, K. E. 2002. Evaluation of predation risk in the collectively foraging termite Macrotermes bellicosus. Insectes Sociaux 49: 264-269.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P. 1997. Patch use by gerbils in a risky environment: manipulating food and safety to test four models. Oikos 78: 274-282.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P., Brown, J. S., Mitchell, W. A. 1993. Environmental-factors affecting patch use in 2 species of gerbilline rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 614-620.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, S. L., Valone, T. J. 1991. Predators and avian community organization-an experiment in a semidesert grassland. Oecologia 86: 105-112.
   Google Scholar
• Lovette, I. J., Holmes, R. T. 1995. Foraging behavior of American redstarts in breeding and wintering habitats—implications for relative food availability. Condor 97: 782-791.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. E., 2005. Habitat specific foraging of prothonotary warblers: deducing habitat quality. Condor 107: 41-49.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, RA, 1994. Using giving-up densities to investigate search images, functional responses and habitat selection. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Chicago, Illinois: University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Nolet, B. A., Fuld, V. N., van Rijswijk, M. E. C. 2006. Foraging costs and accessibility as determinants of giving-up densities in a swan-pondweed system. Oikos 112: 353-362.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Molokwu, M. N. 2007. On the missed opportunity cost, GUD, and estimating environmental quality. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution, 53: 263-278, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Holmgren, N. M. A., Nilsson, S. G. 1999. Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behaviour. II. A field test with woodpeckers. Oikos 87: 264-276.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Brown, J. S., Smith, H. G. 2002. Long- and short-term state-dependent foraging under predation risk: an indication of habitat quality. Animal Behaviour 63: 981-989.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Malmqvis, A., Nilsson, S. G. 2001. Variability of patch type preferences in relation to resource availability and breeding success in a bird. Oecologia 127: 435-443.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, T. C., Lima, S. L. 2003. Hunting behavior and diet of Cooper's hawks: an urban view of the small-bird-in-winter paradigm. Condor 105: 474-483.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, F. 2006. Harvest rates and patch-use strategy of Egyptian fruit bats in artificial food patches. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 1140-1144.
   Google Scholar
• Shaner, P. J., Bowers, M., Macko, S. 2007. Giving-up density and dietary shifts in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Ecology 88: 87-95.
   Google Scholar
• Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. W., Brown, J. S., Ydenberg, R. C., eds. 2007. Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• USFS. 2001. Midewin land and resource management plan. Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Wilmington, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Valone, T. J., Lima, S. L. 1987. Carrying food items to cover for consumption: the behavior of ten bird species feeding under the risk of predation. Oecologia 71: 286-294.
   Google Scholar
• van Gils, J. A., Tijsen, W. 2007. Short-term foraging costs and long-term fueling rates in centralplace foraging swans revealed by giving-up exploitation times. American Naturalist 169: 609-620.
   Google Scholar
• van Gils, J. A., Edelaar, P., Escudero, G., Piersma, T. 2006. Carrying capacity models should not use fixed prey density thresholds: a plea for using more tools of behavioural ecology. Oikos 104: 198-204.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893-901.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L., Wells, J. V. 1992a. Use of a new reproductive index to evaluate relationship between habitat quality and breeding success. Auk 109: 697-705.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L., Wells, J. V. 1992b. Is density an indicator of breeding success? Auk 109: 706-710.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S. J., Dill, L. M. 2007. Estimating the energetic cost of abiotic conditions using foraging behaviour. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 123-143.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, C. J., Maina, G. G. 2005. Effects of season, understorey vegetation density, habitat edge and tree diameter on patch-use by bark-foraging birds. Functional Ecology 19: 529-536.
   Google Scholar