Restoration, Reintroduction, and captive Propagation for at-risk Butterflies: A review of British and American Conservation Efforts

References

• Baguette, M., Petit, S., Queva, F. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 100-108.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, B. J., Bach, C. E. 2005. Habitat use by the federally endangered Mitchell's satyr butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii) in a Michigan prairie fen. American Midland Naturalist 153: 41-51.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, K. O. 2001. Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine.Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1303-1313.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, K. O., Kindvall, O. 2004. Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. Ecography 27: 49-58.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. L., Holdren, C. E., Kulahci, I. G., Bonebrake, T. C., Inouye, B. D., Fay, J. P., McMillan, A. N. N., Williams, E. H., Ehrlich, P. R. 2006. Delayed population explosion of an introduced butterfly. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 466-475.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, E. H., Reed, D. H. 1999. Fitness decline under relaxed selection in captive populations. Conservation Biology 13: 665-669.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P. K., Packer, L. 2006. Assessment of potential Karner Blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) (family: Lycanidae) reintroduction sites in Ontario, Canada. Restoration Ecology 14: 645-652.
   Google Scholar
• Crone, E. E., Pickering, D., Schultz, C. B. 2007. Can captive rearing promote recovery of endangered butterflies? An assessment in the face of uncertainty. Biological Conservation 139: 103-112.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Z. G., Wilson, R. J., Brereton, T. M., Thomas, C. D. 2005. The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story. Biological Conservation 124: 189-198.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Z. G., Wilson, R. J., Coles, S., Thomas, C. D. 2006. Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterfly, in response to climate warming. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 247-256.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T., Green, D., Parsons, M., Bourn, N. 2003. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Number 4. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Delphey, P. 2006. Dakota Skipper Conservation Guidelines, Revised edition. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities Field Office, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Fairborn, D. J., Roff, D. A. 1990. Genetic correlations among traits determining migratory tendency in the sand cricket Gryllus firmus.Evolution 44: 1787-1795.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology 16: 815-825.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R., Asher, J., Brereton, T., Roy, D., Warren, M. 2006. The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Pisces Publications, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Freese, A., Benes, J., Bolz, R., Cizek, O., Dolek, M., Geyer, A., Gros, P., Konvicka, M., Liegl, A., Stettmer, C. 2006. Habitat use of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas maturna and forestry in Central Europe. Animal Conservation 9: 388-397.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, D., Thomas, C. D., Leon-Cortes, J. L. 1999. Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). Oecologia 121: 506-517.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, D. D., Heath, J. W., Bryden, C. A., Johnson, R. M., Fox, C. W. 2003. Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon. Science 299: 1738-1740.
   Google Scholar
• Hoare, D., Davis, T., Parsons, M., Bourn, N. 2004. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Number 5. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, G. J., Brakefield, P. M., Kofman, S., Windig, J. 1991. An artificial diet for butterflies, including Bicyclus species, and its effect on development period, weight and wing pattern. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 30: 121-128.
   Google Scholar
• Hula, V., Konvicka, M., Pavlicko, A., Fric, Z. 2004. Marsh Fritillary (Euphydiyas aurinia) in the Czech Republic: monitoring, metapopulation structure, and conservation of an endangered butterfly. Entomologica Fennica 15: 231-241.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 1998. Guidelines for re-introduction: Prepared by IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, J., Pullin, A. S. 1997. The effects of flooding on the survival and behaviour of overwintering large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia larvae. Biological Conservation 82: 61-66.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, J., Pullin, A. S. 1999. Field studies on flooding and survival of overwintering large heath butterfly, Coenonympha tullia, larvae on Fenn's and Whixall Mosses in Spropshire and Wrexham, UK. Ecological Entomology 24: 426-431.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Harpke, A., Hirneisen, N., Leopold, P., Musche, M., Settele, J. 2008. Getting the public involved in butterfly conservation: lessons learned from a new monitoring scheme in Germany. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 89-103, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Kwilosz, J. R., Knutson, R. L. 1999. Prescribed fire management of Karner blue butterfly habitat at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Natural Areas Journal 19: 98-108.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. T., Thomas, C. D. 2001. Adaptations to captivity in the butterfly Pieris brassicae (L.) and the implications for ex situ conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 5: 55-63.
   Google Scholar
• Longcore, T., Mattoni, R., Pratt, G., Rich, C. 1997. On the perils of ecological restoration: lessons from the El Segundo butterfly. In: Keeley, J. E., ed. Second Interface between ecology and land development in California. Occidental College, Los Angeles, pp. 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., O'Hely, M. 2001. Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conservation Genetics 2: 363-378.
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, O., Saarinen, K., Marttila, P. 2000. Six years from passing bell to recovery: habitat restoration of the threatened Chequered Blue Butterfly (Scolitantides orion) in SE Finland. Entomologica Fennica 11: 113-117.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, R., Longcore, T., Krenova, Z., Lipman, A. 2003. Mass rearing of the endangered Palos Verdes blue butterfly (Glaucopsyche lygdamus palosverdesensis: Lycaenidae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 37: 55-67.
   Google Scholar
• McGeoch, M. A. 2002. Insect conservation in South Africa: an overview. African Entomology 10: 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• McIntire, E., Schultz, C. B., Crone, E. E. 2007. Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 725-736.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. F., Hellmann, J. J., Boggs, C. L., Ehrlich, P. R. 2002. Climate change hastens population extinctions. PNAS 99: 6070-6074.
   Google Scholar
• New, T. 1992. Conservation of butterflies in Australia. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 29: 237-253.
   Google Scholar
• New, T. R. 1997. Butterfly conservation, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
   Google Scholar
• New, T. R., Pyle, R. M., Thomas, J. A., Thomas, C. D., Hammond. P. C. 1995. Butterfly conservation management. Annual Review of Entomology 50: 57-83.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, C. N., Pullin, A. S. 2000. A comparison of larval survivorship in wild and introduced populations of the Large Copper butterfly (Lycaena dispar batavus). Biological Conservation 93: 349-358.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, C. N., Pullin, A. S. 2003. The effects of flooding on survivorship in overwintering larvae of the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar batavus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), and its possible implications for restoration management. European Journal of Entomology 100: 65-72.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, P., Settele, J., Henry, P., Woyciechowski, M. 2008. Butterfly monitoring methods: the ideal and the real world. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 69-88, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, M. R., Warren, M. S. 1990. A review of butterfly introductions in Britain and Ireland. Report for the Joint Committee for the Conservation of British Insects. World Wide Fund for Nature, Godalming, Surrey, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. O., Dingle, H. 1989. Responses of selection on flight behavior in migratory populations of milkweed bugs Oncopeltus fasciatus.Evolution 43: 1805-1808.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M., Green, D., Bourn, N., Waring, P. 2000. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Number 1. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M., Green, D., Bourn, N. 2001. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Number 2. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M., Green, D., Bourn, N. 2002. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Number 3. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Benyamini, D. 2007. A template for publishing the "conservation chain" from problem identification to practical action, exemplified through the campaign for butterfly protection in Israel. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 19-39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Settele, J. 2007. The rare butterfly Tomares nesimachus (Lycaenidae) as a bioindicator for pollination services and ecosystem functioning in northern Israel. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 111-136, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, A. S. 1996. Restoration of butterfly populations in Britain. Restoration Ecology 4: 71-80.
   Google Scholar
• Samways, M. J. 2006. Insect Diversity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Chang, G. C. 1998. Challenges in insect conservation: managing fluctuating populations in disturbed environments. In: Fiedler, P., Kareiva, P., eds. Conservation biology for the coming decade. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 228-254.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Crone, E. 1998. Burning prairie to restore butterfly habitat? A modeling approach to management trade-offs for the Fender's blue. Restoration Ecology 6: 244-252.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Hammond, P. W. 2003. Using population viability analysis to develop recovery criteria for endangered insects: Case study of a prairie butterfly. Conservation Biology 17: 1372-1385.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Dzurisin, J., Russell, C. An evaluation of rearing effects to develop methods to enhance conservation of an endangered blue butterfly. Submitted to Journal of Insect Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Settele, J., Kuhn, E., Thomas, J. A., eds. 2005. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe Volume 2: Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Severns, P. M., Boldt, L., Villegas, S. 2006. Conserving a wetland butterfly: quantifying early lifestage survival through seasonal flooding, adult nectar, and habitat preference. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 361-370.
   Google Scholar
• Sibatani, A. 1992. Decline and conservation of butterflies in Japan. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 29: 305-315.
   Google Scholar
• Smallidge, P. J., Leopold, D. J. 1997. Vegetation management for the maintenance and conservation of butterfly habitats in temperate human-dominated landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 38: 259-280.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, N. F. R., Derrickson, S. R., Beissinger, S. R., Wiley, J. W., Smith, T. B., Toone, W. D., Miller, B. 1996. Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology 10: 338-348.
   Google Scholar
• Society for Ecological Restoration Science & Policy Working Group. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tuscon.
   Google Scholar
• Swengel, A. 2001. A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1141-1169.
   Google Scholar
• Swengel, A. B., Swengel, S. R. 2001. A ten-year study to monitor populations of the regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia, (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Wisconsin, USA. 34: 97-115.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, J., Shuey JA, Oberhauser, K. 2004. Population structure of the endangered Mitchell's Satyr, Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii (French): implications for conservation. American Midland Naturalist 152: 304-322.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A. 1995. The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue butterfly. In: Pullin, A. S., ed. Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 180-197.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., Davis, T., Parsons, M. 2006. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Number 7. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• US Code of Federal Regulations. 2005. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. In: USFWS, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001. Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino): draft recovery plan. USFWS, Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Uehara-Prado, M., Fonseca, R. L. 2007. Urbanization and mismatch with protected areas place the conservation of a threatened species at risk. Biotropica 39: 264-268.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C. A. M., Warren, M. S. 2006. Prime butterfly areas of Europe: an initial selection of priority sites for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 5-11.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis DeVries, M. 2004. A quantitative conservation approach for the endangered butterfly, Maculinea alcon.Conservation Biology 18: 489-499.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Lei, G., Xu, R. 2004. Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network. Ecological Entomology 29: 367-374.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. S. 1993. A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain. 2. Site management and habitat selection of key species. Biological Conservation 64: 37-49.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. S., Thomas, J. A. 1992. Butterfly responses to coppicing. In: Buckley, G. P., ed. Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 249-270.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M., Brereton, T., Wigglesworth, T. 2005. Do agri-environment schemes help butterflies? Experience from the UK. In: Kuhn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. A., Settele, J., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Volume 1: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth, T., Davis, T., Parsons, M. 2005. Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin, Volume 6. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.
   Google Scholar