Habitat Selection and the Evolution of Specialists in Heterogeneous Environments

References

• Abrams, P.A. 2006a. The prerequisites for and likelihood of generalist-specialist coexistence. Am. Nat. 167: 329-342.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, P.A. 2006b. Adaptive change in the resource-exploitation traits of a generalist consumer: the evolution and coexistence of generalists and specialists. Evolution 60: 427-439.
   Google Scholar
• Albon, S.D., Coulson, T.N., Brown, D., Guinness, F.E., Pemberton, J.M., Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2000. Temporal changes in the key factor and the key age group influencing population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 1099-1110.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M.S. 2006. Scale for resource selection functions. Diversity and Distribution12: 269-276.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M.S., McDonald, L.L. 1999. Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 268-272.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M.S., Mao, J.S., Merrill, E.H., Fortin, D., Turner, M.G., Fryxell, J., Turchin, P. 2003. Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park. Écoscience 10: 421-431.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Pavolvic, N.B. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol. Ecol. 6: 360-382.
   Google Scholar
• Coltman, D.W., O'Donaoghue, P., Jorgensons, J.T., Hogg, J.T., Strobeck, C., Festa-Bianchet, M. 2003. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426: 655-658.
   Google Scholar
• Conradt, L., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Guinness, F.E. 1999. The relationship between habitat choice and lifetime reproductive success in female red deer. Oecologia 120: 218-224.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, T., Albon, S., Guinness, F., Pemberton, J., Clutton-Brock, T. 1997. Population substructure, local density, and calf winter survival in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Ecology 78: 852-863.
   Google Scholar
• Dwernychuk, L.W., Boag, D.A. 1972. Ducks nesting in association with gulls—an ecological trap? Can. J. Zool. 50: 559-563.
   Google Scholar
• Edeline, E., Carlson, S.M., Stige, L.C., Winfield, I.J., Fletcher, J.M., James, J.B., Haugen, T.O., Vøllestad, L.A., Stenseth, N.C. 2007. Trait changes in a harvested population are driven by a dynamic tug-of-war between natural and harvest selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 15799-15804.
   Google Scholar
• Egas, M., Dieckmann, U., Sabelis, M.W. 2004. Evolution restricts the coexistence of specialists and generalists: the role of trade-off structure. Am. Nat. 163: 518-531.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L. Jr. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 14: 16-36.
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell, J., Lundberg, P. 1997. Individual behavior and population dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, 202 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrilets, S. 1997. Evolution and speciation in holey adaptive landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 307-312.
   Google Scholar
• Geritz S.A.H., Metz, J.A.J., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G. 1997. Dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary branching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78: 2024-2027.
   Google Scholar
• Grafen, A. 1982. How not to measure inclusive fitness. Nature 298: 425.
   Google Scholar
• Grafen, A. 1984. Natural selection, kin selection, and group selection. In: Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B., eds. Behavioral ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA, pp. 62-84.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D. 1996. Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on evolution. Oikos 75: 182-192.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, L.R., Maynard Smith, J. 1976. The coevolution and stability of competing species. Am. Nat. 110: 79-99.
   Google Scholar
• Lele, S.R., Keim, J.L. 2006. Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. Ecology 87: 3021-3028.
   Google Scholar
• Levins, R. 1962. Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment, I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am. Nat. 96: 361-378.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, R. H., Levins, R. 1964. Competition, habitat selection and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 51: 1207-1210.
   Google Scholar
• Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L., Erickson, W.P. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 221 pp.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, P., Boyce, M.S., Coulson, T., Clutton-Brock, T. 2006. Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection. Proc. R. Soc. London B 273: 1449-1454.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, P.D., Gaillard, J.M., Boyce, M.S., Bonenfant, C., Messier, F., Duncan, P., Delorme, D., Van Moorter, B., Said, S., Klein, F. 2007. Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore. Ecology 88: 3192-3201.
   Google Scholar
• McPeek, M. A. 1996. Trade-offs, food web structure, and the coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists. Am. Nat. 148: S124-S138.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A., van Heerwaarden, J.S. 1996. Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: van Strien, S.J., Verduyn Lunel, S.M., eds. Stochastic and spatial structures of dynamical systems. North Holland, Dordrecht, pp. 183-231.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W.A., Valone, T.J. 1990. The optimization research program: studying adaptations by their function. Q. Rev. Biol. 65: 43-52.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1987. Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 269-281.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1988. Habitat dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 2003a. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 2003b. How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management? Wildl. Res. 30: 303-319.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W., Davidson, D.L. 2000. Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology 81: 2061-2066.
   Google Scholar
• Nussey, D.H., Coltman, D.W., Coulson, T., Kruuk, L.E.B., Donald, A., Morris, J., Clutton-Brock, T., Pemberton, J. 2005. Rapidly declining fine-scale spatial genetic structure in female red deer. Mol. Ecol. 14: 3395-3405.
   Google Scholar
• Réale, D., McAdam, A.G., Boutin, S., Berteaux, D. 2003. Genetic and plastic response of a northern mammal to climate change. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270: 591-596.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1974. On the evolution of habitat selection. Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, The Hague, pp. 101-104.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Am. Nat. 137: S5-S28.
   Google Scholar
• Schlaepfer, M.A., Runge, M.C., Sherman, P.W. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. T. Ecol. Evol. 17: 474-480.
   Google Scholar
• Turchin, P. 2001. Does population ecology have general laws? Oikos 94: 17-26.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, T.L., Brown, J.S. 1984. Stability in an evolutionary game. Theor. Pop. Biol. 26: 408-427.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, T.L., Brown, J.S. 2005. Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and Darwinian dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 400 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D.S., Yoshimura, J. 1994. On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. Am. Nat. 144: 692-707.
   Google Scholar