Density-Dependent Habitat and Patch use in Gerbils: Consequences of Safety in Numbers?

References

• Abramsky, Z. 1988. The role of habitat and productivity in structuring desert rodent communities. Oikos 52: 107-114.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Pinshow, B. 1989. Changes in foraging effort in 2 gerbil species correlate with habitat type and intraspecific and interspecific activity. Oikos 56: 43-53.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Brand, S., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985a. Geographical ecology of Gerbilline rodents in the sand dune habitats of Israel. J. Biogeogr. 12: 363-372.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Brand, S., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985b. Habitat selection in Israeli desert rodents. Isr. J. Zool. 33: 111-111.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S., Kotler, B., Mitchell, W.A. 1990. Habitat selection—an experimental field-test with 2 gerbil species. Ecology 71: 2358-2369.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B. 1991. The shape of a gerbil isocline measured using principles of optimal habitat selection. Ecology 72: 329-340.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1992. The shape of a gerbil isocline—an experimental field-study. Oikos 63: 193-199.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Ovadia, O., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1994. The shape of a Gerbillus pyramidum (Rodentia, Gerbillinae) isocline: an experimental fieldstudy. Oikos 69: 318-326.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Strauss, E., Subach, A., Kotler, B.P., Riechman, A. 1996. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and Gerbillus pyramidum.Oecologia 105: 313-319.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1997. Gerbils under threat of owl predation: isoclines and isodars. Oikos 78: 81-90.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1998. Do gerbils care more about competition or predation? Oikos 83: 75-84.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 2002. The costs of apprehensive foraging. Ecology 83: 1330-1340.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Belmaker, J., Bar, A. 2004. The impact of long-term continuous risk of predation on two species of gerbils. Can. J. Zool. 82: 464-474.
   Google Scholar
• Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Elbaz, M., Ziv, Y. 2005. Does interspecific competition from congeners cause the scarcity of Gerbillus henleyi in productive sandy desert habitats? J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 567-578.
   Google Scholar
• Bar, Y., Abramsky, Z., Gutterman, Y. 1984. Diet of gerbilline rodents in the Israeli desert. J. Arid Environ. 7: 371-376.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Natan, G., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. 2004. Seeds redistribution in sand dunes: a basis for coexistence of two rodent species. Oikos 105: 325-335.
   Google Scholar
• Berec, M., Krivan, V., Berec, L. 2006. Asymmetric competition, body size, and foraging tactics: testing the ideal free distribution in two competing fish species. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 929-942.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, B.C.R. 1978. Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Davies, N.B., ed. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 64-96.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S., Abramsky, Z. 1987. Body masses of gerbilline rodents in sandy habitats of Israel. J. Arid Environ. 12: 247-253.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 37-47.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Arel, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P. 1992. Patch use by gerbils (Gerbillus-Allenbyi) in sandy and rocky habitats. J. Mammal. 73: 821-829.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Mitchell, W.A. 1994a. Foraging theory, patch use, and the structure of a Negev desert granivore community. Ecology 75: 2286-2300.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Valone, T.J. 1994b. Foraging under predation - a comparison of energetic and predation costs in rodent communities of the Negev and Sonoran deserts. Aust. J. Zool. 42: 435-448.
   Google Scholar
• Charnov, E.L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9: 129-136.
   Google Scholar
• Danin, A., Yaalon, D.H. 1978. Plant species-diversity and plant succession in a sandy area in northern Negev. Flora 167: 409-422.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D.L., Morris, D.W. 2001. Density-dependent foraging effort of Deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Funct. Ecol. 15: 575-583.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, B., Dobson, F.S. 2007. Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection. Anim. Behav. 73: 115-123.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in seasonal environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.D. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. 1. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfriend, W., Ward, D., Subach, A. 1991. Standard operative temperatures of 2 desert rodents, Gerbillus Allenbyi and Gerbillus Pyramidum—the effects of morphology, microhabitat and environmental-factors. J. Theor. Biol. 16: 157-166.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P. 1985. Microhabitat utilization in desert rodents—a comparison between two methods of measurement. J. Mammal. 66: 374-378.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. 1988. Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 19: 281-307.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. 1990. Rates of seed harvest by 2 species of gerbilline rodents. J. Mammal. 71: 591-596.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Dall, S.R.X., Gresser, S., Ganey, D., Bouskila, A. 2002. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 495-518.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Bouskila, A. 2004a. Apprehension and time allocation in gerbils: the effects of predatory risk and energetic state. Ecology 85: 917-922.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Bouskila, A., Mukherjee, S., Goldberg, T. 2004b. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: seasonal changes in schedules of activity and apprehension. Isr. J. Zool. 50: 255-271.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B.P., Dickman, C.R., Wasserberg, G., Ovadia, O. 2005. The use of time and space by male and female gerbils exploiting a pulsed resource. Oikos 109: 594-602.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Wang, G. 2006. The ideal free distribution of clonal plant's ramets among patches in a heterogeneous environment. Bull. Math Biol. 68: 1837-1850.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation—a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, G., Ramp, D., Coulson, G. 2006. Foraging behaviour and dispersion of eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in an ideal free framework. J. Zool. 268: 261-269.
   Google Scholar
• May, R.M. 1976. Simple mathematical-models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261: 459-467.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W.A., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S. 1990. The effect of competition on foraging activity in desert rodents—theory and experiments. Ecology 71: 844-854.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1988. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1994. Habitat matching: alternatives and implications to populations and communities. Evol. Ecol. 8: 387-406.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1997. Optimally foraging deer mice in prairie mosaics: a test of habitat theory and absence of landscape effects. Oikos 80: 31-42.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 2001. Learning from the games animals play: using behavior to assess spatial structure and stochasticity in natural populations. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38: 37-53.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W., Mukherjee, S. 2007. Can we measure carrying capacity with foraging behavior? Ecology 88: 597-604.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Molokwu, M.N. 2007. On the missed opportunity cost, GUD, and estimating environmental quality. Isr. J. Zool. 53(3-4): 263-278.
   Google Scholar
• Ovadia, O., Abramsky, Z. 1995. Density-dependent habitat selection—evaluation of the isodar method. Oikos 73: 86-94.
   Google Scholar
• Ovadia, O., Dohna, H.Z. 2003. The effect of intra- and interspecific aggression on patch residence time in Negev desert gerbils: a competing risk analysis. Behav. Ecol. 14: 583-591.
   Google Scholar
• Pulliam, H.R., Danielson, B.J. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection—a landscape perspective on population-dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: S50-S66.
   Google Scholar
• Pusenius, J., Schmidt, K.A. 2002. The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles. Oikos 98: 251-262.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z. 1986. Centrifugal Community Organization. Oikos 46: 339-348.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z., Subach, A. 1997. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5713-5715.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, D.W., Krebs, J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserberg, G., Kotler, B.P., Abramsky, Z. 2006. The role of site, habitat, seasonality and competition in determining the nightly activity patterns of psammophilic gerbils in a centrifugally organized community. Oikos 112: 573-579.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserberg, G., Kotler, B.P., Morris, D.W., Abramsky, Z. 2007. A field test of the centrifugal community organization model using psammophilic gerbils in Israel's southern coastal plain. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9: 299-311.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, A., Wahrman, J. 1957. The cytotaxonomy, ecology and evolution of the gerbils and jirds of Israel (Rodentia: Gerbillinae). Mammalia 21: 341-380.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Subach, A. 1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in 2 gerbil species. Oikos 66: 237-246.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, Y., Kotler, B.P., Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Foraging efficiencies of competing rodents—why do gerbils exhibit shared-preference habitat selection. Oikos 73: 260-268.
   Google Scholar