31
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

CONTEXT DEPENDENCE OF NONLETHAL EFFECTS OF A PREDATOR ON PREY GROWTH

&
Pages 139-167 | Published online: 14 Mar 2013

References

  • Peacor, S.D., Werner, E.E. 2004. How dependent are species-pain interaction strengths on other species in the food web? Ecology, in press.
  • Abrams, P.A. 1990. The effects of adaptive behavior on the type-2 functional response. Ecology 71: 877-885.
  • Abrams, P.A., Menge, B.A., Mittelbach, G.G., Spiller, D., Yodzis, P. 1996. The role of indirect effects in food webs. In: Polis, G., Winemiller, K., eds. Food webs: dynamics and structure. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, pp. 371-395.
  • Abramsky, Z., Rosenweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1998. Do gerbils care more about competition or predation? Oikos 83: 75-84.
  • Beckerman, A.P., Uriarte, M., Schmitz, O.J. 1997. Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 10735-10738.
  • Bertram, B.C.R. 1978. Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B., eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 64-96.
  • Bolker, B., Holyoak, M., Krivan, V., Rowe, L., Schmitz, O. 2003. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84: 1101-1114.
  • Dehn, M.M. 1990. Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 337-342.
  • McIntosh, A.R., Townsend, C.R. 1996. Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish induced changes to grazer behaviour? Oecologia 108: 174-181.
  • McNamara, J.M., Houston, A.I. 1992. Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size. Animal Behaviour 43: 641-658.
  • McPeek, M.A., Grace, M., Richardson, J.M.L. 2001. Physiological and behavioral responses to predators shape the growth/predation risk trade-off in damselflies. Ecology 82: 1535-1545.
  • Peacor, S.D. 2002. Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour. Ecology Letters 5: 77-85.
  • Peacor, S.D. 2003. Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density: a new mechanism arising from predation risk assessment. Oikos 100: 409-415.
  • Peacor, S.D., Werner, E.E. 1997. Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a simple aquatic food web. Ecology 78: 1146-1156.
  • Werner, E.E., Anholt, B.R. 1996. Predator-induced behavioral indirect effects: consequences to competitive interactions in anuran larvae. Ecology 77: 157-169.
  • Werner, E.E., Peacor, S.D. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology 84: 1083-1100.
  • Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F., Hall, D.J., Mittelbach, G.G. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540-1548.
  • Wissinger, S., McGrady, J. 1993. Intraguild predation and competition between larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects of shared prey. Ecology 74: 207-218.
  • Wootton, J.T. 1994. Putting the pieces together: testing the independence of interactions among organisms. Ecology 75: 1544-1551.
  • Elgar, M.A. 1989. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 64: 13-33.
  • Gilliam, J.F. 1982. Habitat use and competitive bottlenecks in size-structured fish populations. Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University.
  • Grand, T.C., Dill, L.M. 1999. The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Animal Behaviour 58: 443-451.
  • Harper, J.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.
  • Houston, A.I., Mcnamara, J.M., Hutchinson, J.M.C. 1993. General results concerning the tradeoff between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 341: 375-97.
  • Huang, C.F., Sih, A. 1990. Experimental studies on behaviorally mediated, indirect interactions through a shared predator. Ecology 71: 1515-1522.
  • Huang, C.F., Sih, A. 1991. Experimental studies on direct and indirect interactions in a 3 trophic-level stream system. Oecologia 85: 530-536.
  • Kats, L.B., Dill, L.M. 1998. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5: 361-394.
  • Kats, L.B., Petranka, J.W., Sih, A. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistance of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69: 1865-1870.
  • Laurila, A., Kujasalo, J., Ranta, E. 1998. Predator-induced changes in life history in two anuran tadpoles: effects of predator diet. Oikos 83: 307-317.
  • Lima, S.L. 1990. The influence of models on the interpretation of vigilance. In: Bekoff, M., Jamieson, D., eds. Interpretation and explanation in the study of animal behaviour: Vol. 2. Explanation, evolution and adaptation. Westview Press, pp. 246-267.
  • Lima, S.L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions--What are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience 48: 25-34.
  • Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation--a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology--Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 68: 619-640.
  • Loose, C.J., Dawidowicz, P. 1994. Trade-offs in diel vertical migration by zooplankton--the costs of predator avoidance. Ecology 75: 2255-2263.
  • McCollum, S.A., Van Buskirk, J. 1996. Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. Evolution 50: 583-593.
  • Peacor, S.D., Werner, E.E. 2000. The effects of a predator on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behavior. Ecology 81: 1998-2010.
  • Peacor, S.D., Werner, E.E. 2001. Effects of predators on ecological communities: the role of adaptive prey behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 3904-3908.
  • Peckarsky, B.L., Taylor, B.W., McIntosh, A.R., McPeek, M.A., Lytle, D.A. 2001. Variation in mayfly size at metamorphosis as a developmental response to risk of predation. Ecology 82: 740-757.
  • Pulliam, H.R. 1973. Advantages of flocking. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38: 419-422.
  • Real, L.A. 1979. Ecological determinants of functional-response. Ecology 60: 481-485.
  • Relyea, R.A. 2000. Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81: 2278-2289.
  • Relyea, R.A. 2001. The relationship between predation risk and antipredator responses in larval anurans. Ecology 82: 541-554.
  • Relyea, R.A. 2002. The many faces of predation: how induction, selection, and thinning combine to alter prey phenotypes. Ecology 83: 1953-1964.
  • Royama, T. 1971. Researches on population ecology. Supplement No. 1: 1-90.
  • Soluk, D.A., Collins, N.C. 1988. Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies--facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52: 94-100.
  • Tollrian, R., Harvell, C.D. 1999. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Van Buskirk, J., Yurewicz, K.L. 1998. Effects of predators on prey growth rate: relative contributions of thinning and reduced activity. Oikos 82: 20-28.
  • Watkinson, A.R. 1980. Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 83: 345-357.
  • Werner, E.E. 1991. Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between 2 anuran larvae. Ecology 72: 1709-1720.
  • Werner, E.E., Anholt, B.R. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality-rates mediated by foraging activity. American Naturalist 142: 242-272.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.