Task Lighting Effects on Office Worker Satisfaction and Performance, and Energy Efficiency

References

• [ANSI/IESNA] American National Standards Institute/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2004. American national standard practice for office lighting ANSI/IESNA-RP-1–04. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Bean AR, Hopkins AG. 1980. Task and background lighting. Light Res Tech. 12 (3): 135–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bernecker CA, Davis RG, Webster MP, Webster JP. 1983. Task lighting in the open office: a visual comfort perspective. J Illum Eng Soc. 22 (1): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Berrutto V, Fontoynont M, Avouac-Bastie P. 1997. Importance of wall luminance on users satisfaction: pilot study on 73 office workers. Proceedings of Lux Europa –8th European Lighting Conference (Amsterdam) Arnhem: NSVV: 82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 1979. Users' attitudes to some types of local lighting. Light Res Tech. 11 (3): 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Myer M, Hunter C. 2003. Lighting quality and office work: a field simulation study (PNNL 14506). Richland, WA, USA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/fulltext/b3214.1/. Last accessed Nov. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 1993. Lighting for offices, LG7. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 1994. Code for interior lighting. London, UK: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Collins B L, Fisher WS, Gillette GL, Marans RW. 1989. Evaluating office lighting environments: second level analysis. NIST Report NISTIR 89–4069, 129 pages. (also published in abbreviated form in: J Illum Eng Soc. 19(2):21–44).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer D. 1980. General lighting versus local lighting in offices. Int Light Rev. (4):108–110.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn JE, Hendrick C, Spencer T, Martyniuk O. 1979. A guide to methodology procedures for measuring subjective impressions in lighting. J Illum Eng Soc. 8: 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GBCA. 2004. Green star environmental rating system for buildings: office interiors (pilot). Green Building Council Australia.
   Google Scholar
• [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2000. Lighting handbook 9th edition (Ed: Rea M). New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
   Google Scholar
• [LBNL] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. City of Berkeley (14 Person Office), http://eetd.lbl.gov/BTD/lsr/ld_table_case2.html. participant surveys, http://eetd.lbl.gov/BTD/lsr/ld_table_case9.html. Last accessed Nov. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Loe DL, Mansfield KP, Rowlands E. 1994. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology 26 (3): 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• McKennan GT, Parry CM. 1984. An investigation of task lighting for offices. Light Res Tech. 16 (4): 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• New Buildings Institute. 2001. Advanced lighting guidelines. http://www.newbuildings.org/lighting.htm. Last accessed Nov. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Veitch JA. 2001. Lighting quality recommendations for VDT offices: a new method of derivation. Light Res Tech. 33 (2): 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Arsenault C, Veitch JA. 2002. Preferred surface illuminances and the benefits of individual lighting control: a pilot study. Proceedings of the IESNA Annual Conference (Salt Lake City): 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Veitch JA, Arsenault C, Duval C. 2003. Lighting for VDT workstations 1: effect of control on energy consumption and occupant mood, satisfaction and discomfort. IRC Research Report RR-165. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Research Council. http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/fulltext/rr165/ Last accessed Nov. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Veitch JA, Arsenault C, Duval C. 2004. Lighting for VDT workstations 2: effect of control on task performance and chosen photometric conditions. IRC Research Report RR-166. Ottawa, ON, Canada: National Research Council. http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/fulltext/rr166/. Last accessed Nov. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS. 1983. Behavioral responses to a flexible desk luminaire. J Illum Eng Soc. 13 (1): 174–190.
   Google Scholar
• Russell JA, Mehrabian A. 1977. Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. J Res Pers. 11: 273–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuchi Y, Matsushima K, Nakamura H. 1995. Preferred illuminances on surrounding surfaces in relation to task illuminance in office room using task-ambient lighting, Journal of Light & Visual Environment 19(1):28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Tiller DK, Pasini IC, Jaekel RR, Newsham GR, Iwata T. 1995. Furniture mounted lighting system performance: 1. Lighting energy consumption. Proceedings of the CIE 23rd Session (New Delhi, India): 296–297.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 1998. Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance, mood, health, satisfaction and comfort. J Illum Eng Soc. 27 (1): 107–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 2000a. Exercised control, lighting choices and energy use: an office simulation experiment. J Environ Psychol. 20 (3) September: 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 2000b. Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan offices: Research and practice recommendations. Light Res Tech. 32: 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsey R, Miller N. 1994. Lighting answers: task lighting for offices. National Lighting Product Information Program. 1 (3). Lighting Research Center: Troy, NY. 8 p.
   Google Scholar
• Yamakawa K, Watabe K, Inanuma M, Sakata K, Takeda H. 2000. A study on the practical use of a task and ambient lighting system in an office. J Light & Visual Environ. 24 (2): 15–18.
   Google Scholar