Publication Cover
LEUKOS
The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society
Volume 8, 2011 - Issue 2
140
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Tangible lighting controls—Reporting end-users' interactions with lighting control interfaces

, &
Pages 123-136 | Published online: 16 Sep 2013

References

  • Bordass B, Leaman A, Bunn R. 2007. Controls for end users: A guide for good design and implementation. Reading, Berkshire (UK): Building Controls Industry Association. 27 p.
  • Butler KA. 1996. Usability engineering turns 10. Interactions. 3 (1): 58–75.
  • Djajadiningrat T, Overbeeke K, Wensveen S. 2002. But how, Donald, tell us how? On the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. Proceedings of DIS 2002, the 4th International Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques; London (UK). New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. p. 285–291.
  • Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. 1988. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. 12 (2): 259–274.
  • Dugar AM. 2010. Tangible Lighting Controls—A framework for improving the interactivity and usability of lighting control interfaces. Lighting Magazine (AU). 30 (2): 34–42.
  • Dugar AM, Donn MR. 2011. Tangible intervention—Improving the effectiveness of lighting control systems. Lighting Research and Technol. 43 (3): 381–393.
  • Escuyer S, Fontoynont M. 2001. Lighting controls: a field study of office workers' reactions. Lighting Res Technology 33 (2): 77–94.
  • Hornecker E, Buur J. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Montreal, Quebec (Canada). New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. p. 437–446.
  • Jensen MV, Buur J, Djajadiningrat T. 2005. Designing the user actions in tangible interaction. In: Bertelsen OW, Bouvin NO, Krogh PG, Kyng M, eds. Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility; Aarhus (Denmark). New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery. p. 9–18.
  • Leaman A. 1995. Dissatisfaction and office productivity. Facilities. 13 (2): 13–19.
  • Maniccia D, Rutledge B, Rea MS, Morrow W. 1999. Occupant use of manual lighting controls in private offices. J Illum Eng Soc. 28 (2): 42–56.
  • Mayes JT, Fowler CJ. 1999. Learning technology and usability: A framework for understanding courseware. Interact Comput. 11 (5): 485–497.
  • Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater AI. 2002. A field study of occupant controlled lighting in offices. Lighting Res Technol. 34 (3): 191–202.
  • Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater AI. 2004. A study of opinion in offices with and without user controlled lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 36 (2): 131–144.
  • Norman DA. 1990. The design of everyday things. New York, (NY): Doubleday. 272 p.
  • Overbeeke K, Djajadiningrat T, Hummels C, Wensveen S. 2002. Beauty in usability. In: Green W, Jordan P, eds. Pleasure with products: Beyond usability. London (UK): Taylor & Francis. p. 9–18.
  • Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. 2002. Interaction design. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 544 p.
  • Winchip SM. 2005. Designing a quality lighting environment. New York (NY): Fairchild Publications. 796 p.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.