Lighting Controls in Commercial Buildings

References

• ADM Associates, Inc. 2002. Lighting controls effectiveness assessment: final report on bi-level lighting study. Heschong Mahone Group. 78 p.
   Google Scholar
• Atif MR, Galasiu AD. 2003. Energy performance of daylight-linked automatic lighting control systems in large atrium spaces: report on two field-monitored case studies. Energ Buildings. 35 (5): 441–461.
   Google Scholar
• Birt B, Newsham GR. 2009. Energy savings from photosensors and occupant sensors/wall switches on a college campus. Proceedings of Lux Europa 2009, 11th European Lighting Conference. Istanbul, Turkey. p 731–738.
   Google Scholar
• Bisbee D. 2010. Customer advanced technologies program technology evaluation report: HID labs SmartPOD. Sacramento Municipal Utility District. Report # ET09SMUD1012. 12 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bodart M, De Herde A. 2002. Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energ Buildings. 34: 421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois D, Reinhart C, Macdonald I. 2006. Adding advanced behavioural models in whole building energy simulation: a study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control. Energ Buildings. 38 (7): 814–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Eklund NH, Simpson SN. 2000. Individual lighting control: task performance, mood and illuminance. J Illum Eng Soc. 29 (1): 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CLTC] California Lighting Technology Center. Hybrid smart wall switch & bathroom vanity luminaire. http://cltc.ucdavis.edu/content/view/671/357/. [July 2011].
   Google Scholar
• California Lighting Technology Center, Western Cooling Efficiency Center, Emerging Technology Associates, Inc. 2010. San Diego Gas & Electric Emerging Technologies Program: hotel guest room energy controls. San Diego Gas and Electric Company. 33 p.
   Google Scholar
• California Utilities Statewide Codes and Standards Team. 2011a. Draft measure information template - guest room occupancy controls: 2013 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, SoCalGas, SDG&E. 44 p.
   Google Scholar
• California Utilities Statewide Codes and Standards Team. 2011b. Draft measure information template - lighting retrofits: 2013 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, Sempra Utilities. 117 p.
   Google Scholar
• Carrière LA, Rea MS. 1984. Lighting energy consumption in an office building having manual switches. Building Research Note No. 221. Ottawa (ON): National Research Council of Canada, Division of Building Research. 18 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chung TM, Burnett J. 2001. On the prediction of lighting energy savings achieved by occupancy sensors. Energ Eng. 98 (4): 6–23.
   Google Scholar
• Clanton & Associates, Inc. Wireless lighting control: a life cycle cost evaluation of multiple lighting control strategies. Daintree Networks. 26 p.
   Google Scholar
• Deru M, Pless SD, Torcellini PA. 2006. BigHorn Home Improvement Center energy performance. ASHRAE Transactions. 112 (2): 349–366.
   Google Scholar
• *Desroches LB, Garbesi K. 2011. Max tech and beyond: maximizing appliance and equipment efficiency by design. Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 60 p.
   Google Scholar
• *[DOE] U.S. Department of Energy. 2003 CBECS detailed tables. <http://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/detailed_tables_2003.html#enduse03>. Accessed 2011 August 10.
   Google Scholar
• *[DOE] U.S. Department of Energy. 2011a. Building Energy Codes Program. <http://www.energycodes.gov/>. Accessed 2011 August 16.
   Google Scholar
• *[DOE] U.S. Department of Energy. 2011b. Energy efficiency program: test procedure for lighting systems (luminaires). Federal Register 76 (150): 47178–47180.
   Google Scholar
• Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis F. 2007. The impact of colored glazing and spectral response of photosensors in the estimation of daylighting energy savings. Proceedings of the 2nd PALENC Conference and 28th AIVC Conference on Building Low Energy Cooling and Advanced Ventilation Technologies in the 21st Century. p 279–283.
   Google Scholar
• Emerging Technology Associates, Inc. 2010. Advanced lighting control system assessment final report: Veteran Administration Medical Center San Diego. San Diego Gas & Electric. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• Encelium. Case study: University Health Network Toronto General Hospital. Encelium. 2 p.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Solutions. 2009. Advanced lighting controls for demand side management (energy efficiency assessment). San Francisco: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Emerging Technologies Program. 67 p.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory University of Oregon. 2006. Daylight dividends: field test shade control and DaySwitch: final report on DaySwitch demonstration project. Lighting Research Center. Purchase Order No P0052476. 33 p.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiro MG, Rea MS, Rea AC, Stevens RG. 2002. Daylight and productivity: a field study. Proceedings of the 2002 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 8:69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd DB, Parker DS. 2005. Field commissioning of a daylight-dimming lighting system. Proceedings of the Right Light Three, 3rd European Conference on Energy Efficient Lighting. Newcastly upon Tyne (UK). 7 p.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd DB, Parker DS, Sherwin JR. 1996. Measured field performance and energy savings of occupancy sensors: three case studies. Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 4:97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd DB, Parker DS, McIlvaine JER, Sherwin JR. 1995. Energy efficiency technology demonstration project for Florida educational facilities: occupancy sensors. Tallahassee (FL): Florida State Department of Education. FSEC-CR-867-95. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Galasiu AD, Newsham GR. 2009. Energy savings due to occupancy sensors and personal controls: a pilot field study. Proceedings of Lux Europa 2009, 11th European Lighting Conference. Istanbul, Turkey. p 745–752.
   Google Scholar
• Galasiu AD, Atif MR, MacDonald RA. 2004. Impact of window blinds on daylight-linked dimming and automatic on/off lighting controls. Sol Energy. 76 (5): 523–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasiu AD, Newsham GR, Suvagau C, Sander DM. 2007. Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: a field study. Leukos 4 (1): 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granderson J, Gaddam V, DiBartolomeo D, Li X, Rubinstein F, Das S. 2010. Field-measured performance evaluation of a digital daylighting system. Leukos 7 (2): 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Guo X, Tiller DK, Henze GP, Waters CE. 2010. The performance of occupancy-based lighting control systems: a review. Lighting Res Technol. 42: 415–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heschong Mahone Group, Inc. 2005. Sidelighting photocontrols field study. Southern California Edison Co, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance. HMG Job 0416. 186 p.
   Google Scholar
• Heschong Mahone Group, Inc. 2003a. Daylight and retail sales. [CEC] California Energy Commission. P500-03-082-A-5. CEC Contract No. 400-99-013. 86 p.
   Google Scholar
• Heschong Mahone Group, Inc. 2003b. Windows and classrooms: a study of student performance and the indoor environment. [CEC] California Energy Commission. P500-03-082-A-7. CEC Contract No. 400-99-013. 131 p.
   Google Scholar
• International Facility Management Association, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2005. Lighting research program case studies. [CEC] California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research Program. CEC-500-2005-141-A26. CEC Contract # 500-01-041. 8 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings J, Colak N, Rubinstein F. 2001. Occupancy and time-based lighting controls in open offices. Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Conference of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings JD, Rubinstein FM, DiBartolomeo D. 2000. Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting controls testbed. J Illum Eng Soc. 29 (2): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jones CC, Richman E. 2005. Lighting business case: a reporting analyzing lighting technology opportunities with high return on investment energy savings for the federal sector. US Department of Energy. PNNL 15341. Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. 64 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kapsis K, Tzempelikos A, Athienitis AK, Zmeureanu RG. 2010. Daylighting performance evaluation of a bottom-up motorized roller shade. Sol Energy. 84 (12): 2120–2131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyle B, Papamichael K. 2010. Dual-loop photosensor control systems: reliable, cost-effective lighting control for skylight applications. Proceedings of the 2010 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 9:157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Selkowitz SE. 2005. The New York Times headquarters daylighting mockup: monitored performance of the daylighting control system. Energ Buildings. 38 (7): 914–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie R, Raghavan R, Howlett O, Eaton C. 2005. The potential of simplified concepts for daylight harvesting. Lighting Res Technol. 37 (1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Li DHW, Lam TNT, Wong SL. 2006. Lighting and energy performance for an office using high frequency dimming controls. Energy Convers Manage. 47 (9–10): 1133–11456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DHW, Cheung KL, Wong SL, Lam TNT. 2010. An analysis of energy-efficient light fittings and lighting controls. Appl Energ. 87 (2): 558–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 2008. T5 fluorescent high-bay luminaires and wireless testing controls. Field Test DELTA 3: 1–12. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 2004a. Daylight Dividends Case Study: Harmony Library Fort Collins, Colorado. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 14 p.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 2004b. Daylight Dividends Case Study: Smith Middle School, Chapel Hill, NC. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 12 p.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 2004c. Daylight Dividends Case Study: TomoTherapy Incorporated, Madison, WI. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 12 p.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 2003a. Integrated skylight luminaire. Field Test DELTA 1: 1–12. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• *[LRC] Lighting Research Center. 2003b. Reducing barriers to use of high efficiency lighting systems final report year 2: March 2002- January 2003. U.S. Department of Energy. 107 p.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 1997a. Sacramento Municipal Utility District Customer Service Center. DELTA Portfolio Lighting Case Studies 2 (2): 1–12. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 1997b. Sony Disc Manufacturing Springfield, Oregon. DELTA Portfolio Lighting Case Studies 2 (1): 1–12. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• [LRC] Lighting Research Center. 1995. 450 South Salina Street Syracuse, New York. DELTA Portfolio Lighting Case Studies 1 (3): 1–12. Troy (NY): Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lutron. [date unknown a]. Case study: The Energy Foundation, San Francisco, CA. Lutron Electronics Co, Inc. 6 p.
   Google Scholar
• Lutron. [date unknown b]. Case study: Georgian College, Ontario, Canada. Lutron Electronics Co, Inc. 4 p.
   Google Scholar
• Maniccia D, Rutledge B, Rea MS, Morrow W. 1999. Occupant use of manual lighting controls in private offices. J Illum Eng Soc. 28 (2): 42–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater A. 2003. Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 35 (1): 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater AI. 2002. A field study of occupant controlled lighting in offices. Lighting Res Technol. 34 (3): 191–205.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Birru D, Cavalcanti D, Shen E, Patel M, Wen Y-J, Das S. 2010. Closed loop integrated lighting and daylighting control for low energy buildings. Proceedings of the 2010 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 9:252–269.
   Google Scholar
• *New Buildings Institute. 2011. Advanced Lighting Guidelines. <http://algonline.org/index.php>. [August 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Aries M, Mancini S, Faye G. 2008. Individual control of electric lighting in a daylit space. Lighting Res Technol. 40 (1): 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson P-E, Aronsson S. 1993. Energy efficient lighting in existing non-residential buildings: a comparison of nine buildings in five countries. Energy. 18 (2): 115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page E, Siminovitch M. 2004. Performance analysis of hotel lighting control system. Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 14p.
   Google Scholar
• Parker DS, Schrum L, Sonne JK, Stedman TC. 1996. Side-by-side testing of commercial office lighting systems: two-lamp fluorescent fixtures. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates. 9 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg S, Eilers M, Reed R. 1996. Behavioral aspects of lighting and occupancy sensors in private offices: a case study of a university office building. Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 8:161–171.
   Google Scholar
• [PIER] Public Interest Energy Research Program. 2008a. IOU Partnership Draft Case Study: Bi-level stairwell lighting system. PIER. 4 p.
   Google Scholar
• [PIER] Public Interest Energy Research Program. 2008b. IOU Partnership Draft Case Study: Integrated Classroom Lighting System (ICLS). PIER. 4 p.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF. 2002. Effects of interior design on the daylight availability in open plan offices. Proceedings of the 2002 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 3:309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Richman EE, Dittmer AL, Keller JM. 1994. Field analysis of occupancy sensor operation: parameters affecting lighting energy savings. U.S. Department of Energy. PNL-10135. Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830. 39 p.
   Google Scholar
• Roisin B, Bodart M, Deneyer A, Dherdt PD. 2008. Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption. Energ Buildings. 40 (4): 514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein F, Enscoe A. 2010. Saving energy with highly-controlled lighting in an open-plan office. J Illum Eng Soc. 7 (1): 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein F, Karayel M. 1982. The measured energy savings from two lighting control strategies. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 20 (5): 1189–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein F, Verderber R. 1990. Automatic lighting controls demonstration. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. LBL-28793. 70 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein F, Colak N, Jennings J, Neils D. 2003. Analyzing occupancy profiles from a lighting controls field study. CIE Session 2003. San Diego, CA. 4 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein F, Jennings J, Avery D, Blanc S. 1998. Preliminary results from an advanced lighting controls testbed. Proceedings of the 1998 Annual Conference of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• Schrum L, Parker DS, Floyd DB. 1996. Daylight dimming systems: studies in energy savings and efficiency. Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 4:311–319.
   Google Scholar
• Sensor Switch. [date unknown a]. Community profiles: Middlesex Community College. Sensor Switch. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sensor Switch. [date unknown b]. State profiles: national distribution warehouse. Sensor Switch. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• Southern California Edison. 2009. Two-way connectivity with a lighting system as a demand response resource. Southern California Edison. DR 07.04 Report. 51 p.
   Google Scholar
• *Southern California Edison. 2008. Office of the Future Phase II report: the 25% solution. The Office of the Future Consortium. ET 08.01. 72 p.
   Google Scholar
• VonNeida B, Maniccia D, Tweed A. 2000. An analysis of the energy and cost savings potential of occupancy sensors for commercial lighting systems. Proceedings of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America 2000 Annual Conference. p 433–459.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State University Extension Energy Program. 2011. Final report E3T Emerging Technology Assessment: Bi-level office lighting with occupancy sensors. Bonneville Power Administration. WSUEEP11-003. 68 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. 2010. Case study: Controls contribute to 40% energy savings in Kaiser Permanente warehouse. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 2 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. 2008. Case study: Miro Controls save energy and support marketing efforts in lighting showroom. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 2 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. 2007. Case study: Watt Stopper/Legrand helps NRG Systems realize big savings. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 3 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown a]. Case study: 851 Target stores use occupancy sensors from The Watt Stopper to save energy. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown b]. Case study: Adobe Systems saves $15,000 in one month on energy costs by using Isolé plug load controls. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown c]. Case study: Estimates show Southern Wine and Spirits will save 55% in lighting costs. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown d]. Case study: Lighting controls find a place in PG&E's energy saving plans. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown e]. Case study: Rhode Island College slashes energy costs in classrooms and library with Watt Stopper occupancy sensors. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown f]. Case study: Watt Stopper contributes to “gold” LEED award for California state office building. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown g]. Case study: The Watt Stopper occupancy sensors reduce university library load by 30%. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• The WattStopper, Inc. [date unknown h]. Case study: Watt Stopper sensors a targeted part of energy conservation measures at Uintah Basin Medical Center. Santa Clara (CA): The WattStopper, Inc. 1 p.
   Google Scholar
• Yang I-H, Nam E-J. 2010. Economic analysis of the daylight-linked lighting control system in office buildings. Sol Energy. 84 (8): 1513–1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar