Paradigm in Sustainability and Environmental Design: Lighting Utilization Contributing to Surplus-Energy Office Buildings

References

• Alimoglu MK, Donmez L. 2005. Daylight exposure and the other predictors of burnout among nurses in a university hospital. Int J Nus Stud. 42 (5): 549–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araji MT, Boubekri M, Chalfoun NV. 2007. An examination of visual comfort in transitional spaces. Arch Sci Rev. 50 (4): 349–357.
   Google Scholar
• Araji MT, Boubekri M. 2008. Window sizing procedures based on vertical illuminance levels and degree of discomfort glare in buildings interiors. Arch Sci Rev. 51 (3): 252–262.
   Google Scholar
• Araji MT, Boubekri M. 2011. A novel way of utilising radiance-matlab visualisation for façade design optimization. Lighting Res Technol. 43 (1): 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer JL, Jalayerian M, Silverstein A, Araji MT. 2010. Systems integration for cost effective carbon neutral buildings: A Masdar headquarters case-study. Proceedings of the 4th American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Conference on Energy and Sustainability. Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 17–22 May.
   Google Scholar
• Cantin F, Dubois MC. 2011. Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity. Lighting Res Technol. 43 (3): 291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel J, Collins B, Dogniaux R, Longmore J. 1982. Glare from windows: Current view of the problem. Lighting Res Technol, 14 (1): 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvel P, Perraudeau M. 1995. Daylight as a source of visual discomfort: Daylighting atlas. Lyon (France): Commission of the European Communities Report JOU2 CT92-0144.
   Google Scholar
• Chu CM, Simpson R, editors. 1994. Ecological public health: From vision to practice. Toronto (Canada): University of Toronto. Centre for Health Promotion. 276 p.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] 1994. Code for interior lighting. 15th ed. London (UK): Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 286 p.
   Google Scholar
• Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis F. 2008. Quantifying energy savings in daylight responsive systems: The role of dimming electronic ballasts. Energ Buildings. 40 (1): 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois MC, Blomsterberg A. 2011. Energy saving potential and strategies for electric lighting in future north European, low energy office buildings: A literature review. Energ Buildings. 43 (10): 2572–2582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin H. 2001. Beyond toxicity human health and the natural environment. Am J Prev Med. 20 (3): 234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Tiller DK, Bernecker CA, Mistrick RG. 2003. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Lighting Res Technol. 35 (3): 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings JD, Rubinstein FM, DiBartolomeo D. 2000. Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting controls testbed. J Illum Eng Soc. 29 (2): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. Kaplan S. 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. 340 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo FE, Sullivan WC, Coley RL, Brunson L. 1998. Fertile ground for community: Inner city neighborhood common spaces. Am J Commun Psychol. 26 (6): 823–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küller R, Wetterberg L. 1996. The subterranean work environment: Impact on well-being and health. Environ Int. 22 (1): 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie RP, Radetsky LC, Smith AM. 2011. Conceptual design metrics for daylighting. Lighting Res Technol. [Published on-line before print: doi: 10.1177/1477153511423076].
   Google Scholar
• Lighting Research Center. 1999. Demonstration and evaluation of lighting technologies and applications delta snapshots. http://lrc.rpi.edu/programs/delta/pdf/DeltaSnap5.pdf. [March 2009]
   Google Scholar
• Lockley SW. 2009. Influence of light on circadian rhythmicity in humans. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopaedia of Neuroscience. Oxford (UK): Academic Press. 971–986.
   Google Scholar
• Lutron Electronics Co Inc. 2008. Case study of the New York Times building. http://lutron.com. [March 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J, Heschong L, Lee E. 2009. Daylight metrics and energy savings. Lighting Res Technol. 41 (3): 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N, Christoffersen J. 2011. Daylighting metrics for residential buildings. Proceedings of the 27th Session of the Commission International de l'Eclairage. Sun City, South Africa. 10–15 July.
   Google Scholar
• Nazzal A, Oki M. 2007. Could daylight glare be defined mathematically. J Light Vis Environ. 31 (1): 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• New Buildings Institute. 2011. Advanced Lighting Guidelines. http://algonline.org/index.php. [April 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Nicol F, Wilson M, Chiancarella C. 2006. Using field measurements of desktop illuminance in European offices to investigate its dependence on outdoor conditions and its effect on occupant satisfaction and the use of lights and blinds. Energ Buildings. 38 (7): 802–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechacek CS, Andersen M, Lockley SW. 2008. Preliminary method for prospective analysis of the circadian efficacy of (day) light with applications to healthcare architecture. Leukos. 5 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport A. 2005. Culture, architecture and design. Chicago (IL): Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc. 138 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS, editor. 1993. Lighting handbook: Reference and application, 8th ed. New York (NY): The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 989 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rea M, editor. 2000. The IESNA Lighting Handbook. 9th ed. New York: The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 1000 p.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, LoVerso VRM. 2010. A rules of thumb-based design sequence for diffuse daylight. Lighting Res Technol. 42 (1): 7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Wienold J. 2011. The daylighting dashboard - a simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Build Environ. 46 (2): 386–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckaert WR, Lootens C, Geldof J, Hanselaer P. 2010. Criteria for energy efficient lighting in buildings. Energ Buildings. 42 (3): 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffy G. 2002. Architectural lighting design. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons Inc. 280 p.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe JR. 2001. Gone barefoot lately. Am J Prev Med. 20 (3): 243–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb AR. 2006. Considerations for lighting in the built environment: non-visual effects of light. Energ Buildings. 38 (7): 721–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun GY, Shin JY, Kim JT. 2011. Influence of window views on the subjective evaluation of discomfort glare. Indoor Built Environ. 20 (1): 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun GY, Hwang T, Kim JT. 2012. Effects of occupancy and lighting use patterns on lighting energy consumption. Energ Buildings. 46 (3): 152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar