Using Forced Choice Discrimination to Measure the Perceptual Response to Light of Different Characteristics

References

• Atli D, Fotios S. 2011. Rating Spatial Brightness: Does the number of response categories matter? Ingineria Iluminatului. 13 (1): 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Berman SM, Jewett DL, Fein G, Saika G, Ashford F. 1990. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 22 (1): 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution (BSI). 2003. BS EN 13201-2:2003, Road lighting—Part 2: Performance requirements. London (UK): British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough JD, Yuan Z, Rea MS. 2007. Perceived brightness of incandescent and LED aviation signal lights. Aviat. Space Envir. Md. 78 (9): 893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockram AH, Collins JB, Langdon FJ. 1970. A study of user preferences for fluorescent lamp colours for daytime and night-time lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 2 (4): 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA. 2001. Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: A review. Lighting Res Technol. 33 (3): 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2011. Lighting in offices: Lamp spectrum and brightness. Color Technol. 127 (2): 114–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Atli D. 2012. Comparing judgments of visual clarity and spatial brightness using estimates of the relative effectiveness of different light spectra. Leukos. 8 (4): 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2007. Lighting for subsidiary streets: Investigation of lamps of different SPD. Part 2—Brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 39 (3): 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2008. The effect of a stimulus frequency bias in side-by-side brightness ranking tests. Lighting Res Technol. 40 (1): 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2010a. Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments. Lighting Res Technol. 42 (4): 433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2010b. A comparison of simultaneous and sequential brightness judgments. Lighting Res Technol. 42 (2): 183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2011. Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. Part 1: Spatial brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 43(2):143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Houser KW. 2009. Research methods to avoid bias in categorical ratings of brightness. Leukos. 5 (3): 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Houser KW, Cheal C. 2008. Counterbalancing needed to avoid bias in side-by-side brightness matching tasks. Leukos. 4 (4): 207–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper WJ. 1974. On the interpretation of preference experiments in illumination. J Illum Eng Soc. 3 (2): 157–159.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Tiller DK, Hu X. 2004. Tuning the fluorescent spectrum for the trichromatic visual response: A pilot study. Leukos. 1 (1): 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Fotios SA, Royer MP. 2009. A test of the S/P ratio as a correlate for brightness perception using rapid-sequential and side-by-side experimental protocols. Leukos. 6 (2): 119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäkel F, Wichmann FA. 2006. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. J Vision. 6 (11): 1307–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J. 2004. The effect of light on the movement of people. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Interior Design. University of Minnesota, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoeuf RA, Shafir E. 2006. The long and short of it: Physical anchoring effects. J Behav Decis Making. 19: 393–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logadóttir Á, Christoffersen J, Fotios SA. 2011. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set preferred illuminance in a workplace environment. Lighting Res Technol. 43 (4): 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manav B. 2007. An experimental study on the appraisal of the visual environment at offices in relation to colour temperature and illuminance. Build Environ. 42 (2): 979–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navvab M. 2001. A comparison of visual performance under high and low colour temperature fluorescent lamps. J Illum Eng Soc. 30 (2): 170–175.
   Google Scholar
• Pracejus WG. 1967. Preliminary report on a new approach to color acceptance studies. Illuminating Engineering. 62 (12): 663–673.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1977. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. Brit J Psychol. 68: 409–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying judgments. London (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 304 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Radetsky BS, Bullough JD. 2011. Toward a model of outdoor lighting scene brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 43 (1): 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Houser KW. 2012. Spatial brightness perception of trichromatic stimuli. Leukos. 9 (2): 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senders VL, Sowards A. 1952. Analysis of response sequences in the setting of a psychophysical experiment. Am J Psychol. 65 (3): 358–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens N, Bolander A. 2005. Factors in the perception of brightness for LED and incandescent lamps. SAE Transactions. 114 (6): 908–920.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor LH, Socov EW. 1974. The movement of people towards lights. J Illum Eng Soc. 3 (3): 237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Teller DY, Pereverzeva M, Civan AL. 2003. Adult brightness vs. luminance as models of infant photometry: Variability, biasability and spectral characteristics for two age groups favour the luminance model. J Vision. 3: 333–346.
   Google Scholar
• Uchikawa K, Ikeda M. 1986. Accuracy of memory for brightness of colored lights measured with successive comparison method. J Opt Soc Am A. 3 (1): 34–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrabel PL, Bernecker CA, Mistrick RG. 1998. Visual performance and visual clarity under electric light sources: Part II - Visual Clarity. J Illum Eng Soc. 27 (1): 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. 1982. Colour Science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae, 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons. 250 p.
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun Y, Carrasco M, Maloney LT. 2008. Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model. Vision Res. 48 (17): 1837–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar