Evaluation of Sky Luminance and Radiance Models Using Data of North Bangkok

References

• Brunger AP and Hooper FC. 1993. Anisotropic sky radiance model based on narrow field of view measurements of shortwave radiance. Solar Energy 51 (1): 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirarattananon S, Chaiwiwatworakul P and Pattanasethanon S. 2003. Challenges of daylighting with the luminosity and variability of tropical sky. Lighting Res. Technol. 35 (1): 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chirarattananon S, Chaiwiwatworakul P and Pattanasethanon S. 2002., Daylight availability and models for global and diffuse horizontal illuminance and irradiance for Bangkok, Renewable Energy, 26: 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirarattananon S, Limmechokchai B. 1996. Daylighting potential in Thailand. Energy Sources 18: 875–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhorn H and Stoffel J editors. 1996. ADELINE 2.0 Radiance User's manual. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison AW and Coombes CA. 1988. An opaque cloud cover model of sky short wavelength radiance. Solar Energy 41 (4): 387–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison AW. 1991. Directional sky luminance versus cloud cover and solar position. Solar Energy 46 (1): 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson RG, Petherbridge P, Longmore J. 1966. Daylighting. London, United Kingdom: William Heinemann Ltd. 606 p.
   Google Scholar
• Igawa N and Nakamura H. 2001. All sky model as a standard sky for the simulation of daylit environment. Build. Environ. 36: 763–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineichen P and Molineaux B. 1993. Characterisation and comparison of two sky scanner: PRC Krochmann and EKO Instruments, Internal Report, Groupe of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Ineichen P, Molineaux B and Perez R. 1994. Sky luminance data validation: Comparison of seven models with four data banks. Solar Energy 52 (4): 337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittler R. 1986. Luminance model of homogeneous skies for design and energy performance predictions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Daylighting Conference. 1986; November 4–7; Long Beach(CA). GA: American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Lam KP, Mahdavi A, Ullah MB, Ng E and Pal V. 1997. Comparative study of sky luminance models in the tropical context. IBPSA (International Building Performance Simulation Association) Conference, Prague, Vol. 1: 339–345.
   Google Scholar
• Li DHW, Lau CCS and Lam JC. 2001. Evaluation of overcast-sky luminance models against measured Hong Kong data. Appl Energy 70: 321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlefair PJ. 1994. A comparison of sky luminance models with measured data from Garston, United Kingdom. Solar Energy 53 (4): 315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi A, Pal V and Lam KP. 1999. Empirical evaluation of solar radiation, sky luminance and daylight prediction models. J Illum Eng Soc. 28 (1): 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuura K, Iwata T. 1990. A model of daylight source for the daylight illuminance calculations on the all weather conditions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Daylight Conference, Spiridonov A, editor. Paris: CIE.
   Google Scholar
• Muneer T. 1998. Evaluation of the CIE overcast sky model against Japanese data. Energy Build. 27: 175–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peraudeau M. 1990. Daylight availability from energetic data. In: Proceedings of the CIE Daylighting Conference. 1990; Moscow. 1:A17.
   Google Scholar
• Perez R, Ineichen P, Seals R, Michaels J and Stewart R. 1990. Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy 44 (5): 271–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez R, Michalsky J and Seals R. 1992. Modeling sky luminance angular distribution for real sky conditions: Experimental evaluation of existing algorithms. J Illum Eng Soc. 21 (2): 84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez R, Seals R and Michalsky J. 1993. All-weather model for sky luminance distribution-preliminary configuration and validation. Solar Energy 50 (3): 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reas M editor. 2000. The IESNA Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. Daylighting p 359–381.
   Google Scholar
• Treganza PR, Perez R, Michalsky J and Seals R. 1993. Guide to Recommended practice of daylight measurement, CIE TC-3.07, Final Draft.
   Google Scholar
• [US-DOE] U.S. Department of Energy. 2003. EnergyPlus Engineering Document: The Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations. Availability: http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/documentation.html.
   Google Scholar