Miniaturization applied to analysis of nucleic acids in heterogeneous tissues

References

• Syvänen AC. Toward genome-wide SNP genotyping. Nature Genet. 37, S5–S10 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler F, Dölken G. Detection and monitoring of minimal residual disease by quantitative real-time PCR. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 6520–6527 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain KK. Personalised medicine for cancer: from drug development into clinical practice. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 6(9), 1463–1476 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert J. Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics as new tools to optimise cancer chemotherapy. J. Chemother. Suppl. 4, 22–24 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Chen PC, Mitchell MW, Nikitopoulos DE, Soper SA, Murphy MC. Rapid PCR in a continuous flow device. Lab. Chip 4(6), 638–645 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallard F, Marchand G, Ginot F, Campagnolo R. Opto-electronic DNA chip: high performance chip reading with an all-electric interface. Biosens. Bioelectron. 20(9), 1813–1820 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkner T, Janasek D, Manz A. Micro total analysis systems. Recent developments. Anal. Chem. 76(12), 3373–3385 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Mai S, Norton D, Haycock JW, Ryan AJ, Macneil S. Self-organization of skin cells in three-dimensional electrospun polystyrene scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 11(7–8), 1023–1033 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takemura F, Inaba N, Miyoshi E et al. Optimization of liver biopsy RNA sampling and use of reference RNA for cDNA microarray analysis. Anal. Biochem. 337(2), 224–234 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli C, Lerman LO, Sica V, Lerman A, Tajana G, de Nigris F. Microarray analysis: a novel research tool for cardiovascular scientists and physicians. Heart 89(6), 597–604 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JW, Page GP, Gadbury G et al. Empirical Bayes estimation of gene-specific effects in micro-array research. Funct. Integr. Genomics 5(1), 32–39 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman N. Replication, variation and normalisation in microarray experiments. Appl. Bioinformatics 4(1), 33–44 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta V, Cherkassky A, Chatis P et al. Directly labeled mRNA produces highly precise and unbiased differential gene expression data. Nucl. Acids Res. 31(4), e13 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura N, Tamura TA, Murakami M. Evaluation of the performance of two carbodiimide-based cyanine dyes for detecting changes in mRNA expression with DNA microarrays. Biotechniques 38(5), 797–806 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilke S, Chen QR, Whiteford CC, Khan J. Detection of low-level genomic alterations by comparative genomic hybridization based on cDNA micro-arrays. Bioinformatics 21(7), 1138–1145 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva DG, Schonbach C, Brusic V, Socha LA, Nagashima T, Petrovsky N. Identification of ‘pathologs’ (disease-related genes) from the RIKEN mouse cDNA data set using human curation plus FACTS, a new biological information extraction system. BMC Genomics 5(1), 28 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Z, Fan Z, McNeal JE et al. Hepsin and maspin are inversely expressed in laser capture microdissectioned prostate cancer. J. Urol. 169(4), 1316–1319 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd RV, Qian X, Jin L et al. Analysis of pituitary cells by laser capture microdissection. Methods Mol. Biol. 293, 233–241 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabert J, Beillard E, van der Velden VH et al. Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia – a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia 17(12), 2318–2357 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beillard E, Pallisgaard N, van der Velden VH et al. Evaluation of candidate control genes for diagnosis and residual disease detection in leukemic patients using ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) – a Europe against cancer program. Leukemia 17(12), 2474–2486 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taube T, Eckert C, Korner G, Henze G, Seeger K. Real-time quantification of TEL-AML1 fusion transcripts for MRD detection in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Comparison with antigen receptor-based MRD quantification methods. Leuk. Res. 228(7), 699–706 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Pine SR, Moy FH, Wiemels JL et al. Real-time quantitative PCR: standardized detection of minimal residual disease in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Polymerase chain reaction. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 25(2), 103–108 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auroux PA, Koc Y, deMello A, Manz A, Day PJ. Microfluidic polymerase chain reaction. Lab. Chip 4(6), 534–546 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier JS, Girault HH. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay on a microchip with electrochemical detection. Lab. Chip 1(2), 153–157 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu H, Wang H, Huang Y et al. Stable microstructured network for protein patterning on a plastic microfluidic channel: strategy and characterization of on-chip enzyme microreactors. Anal. Chem. 76(21), 6426–6433 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi K, Hattori A, Suzuki I, Ichiki T, Yasuda K. Non-destructive on-chip cell sorting system with real-time microscopic image processing. J. Nanobiotech. 2(1), 5 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pilarski LM, Lauzon J, Strachan E et al. Sensitive detection using microfluidics technology of single cell PCR products from high and low abundance IgH VDJ templates in multiple myeloma. J. Immunol. Methods 305(1), 94–105 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaskill A, Mohr S, Fielden PR, Goddard NJ, Day PJ, Auroux PA. A polymer device for real-time PCR in microdroplets in a continuous-flow chip. µTAS 2005, Boston. Proceedings of 9th International Conference of Miniaturised Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences. (2005) (Abstract 1291).
   Google Scholar
• Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437(7057), 376–380 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Musyanovych A, Mailander V, Landfester K. Miniemulsion droplets as single molecule nanoreactors for polymerase chain reaction. Biomacromolecules 6(4), 1824–1828 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittig R, Salowsky R, Blaich S et al. Multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction combined with on-chip electrophoresis as a rapid screening tool for candidate gene sets. Electrophoresis 26(9), 1687–1691 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panaro NJ, Lou XJ, Fortina P, Kricka LJ, Wilding P. Micropillar array chip for integrated white blood cell isolation and PCR. Biomol. Eng. 21(6), 157–162 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung YC, Jan MS, Lin YC, Lin JH, Cheng WC, Fan CY. Microfluidic chip for high efficiency DNA extraction. Lab. Chip 4(2), 141–147 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban PL, Goodall DM, Bruce NC. Enzymatic microreactors in chemical analysis and kinetic studies. Biotechnol. Adv. (2005) (In Press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lagally ET, Medintz I, Mathies RA. Single-molecule DNA amplification and analysis in an integrated microfluidic device. Anal. Chem. 73(3), 565–570 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor TB, Winn-Deen ES, Picozza E, Woudenberg T, Albin. M. Optimization of the performance of the polymerase chain reaction in silicon-based microstructures. Nucl. Acids Res. 25(15), 3164–3168 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Q, Miao Y, Chen Y et al. Micro-assembled multi-chamber thermal cycler for low-cost reaction chip thermal multiplexing. Sens. Actuators A. 102, 114 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Zou Q, Sridhar U, Chen Y, Singh J. Miniaturized independently controllable multichamber thermal cycler. IEEE Sens. J. 3, 774 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgrader P, Elkin CJ, Brown SB et al. A reusable flow-through polymerase chain reaction instrument for continuous monitoring of infectious biological agents. Anal. Chem. 75(14), 3446–3450 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaytseva NV, Goral VN, Montagna RA, Baeumner AJ. Development of a microfluidic biosensor module for pathogen detection. Lab. Chip 5(8), 805–811 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeid PJ, Christopoulos TK, Crabtree HJ, Backhouse CJ. Microfabricated device for DNA and RNA amplification by continuous-flow polymerase chain reaction and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with cycle number selection. Anal. Chem. 75(2), 288–295 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Gullberg M, Dahl F, Szuhai K, Raap AK. Real-time monitoring of rolling-circle amplification using a modified molecular beacon design. Nucl. Acids Res. 30(14), e66 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmich W, Pelargus C, Leffhalm K, Ros A, Anselmetti D. Single cell manipulation, analytics, and label-free protein detection in microfluidic devices for systems nanobiology. Electrophoresis 26(19), 3689–3696 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan MD. High throughput genotyping technologies for pharmacogenomics. Am. J. Pharmacogenomics 1(4), 295–302 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar