References
- Stumm M, Wegner RD, Bloechle M, Eckel H. Interphase M-FISH applications using commercial probes in prenatal and PGD diagnostics. Cytogenet. Genome Res.114(3–4), 296–301 (2006).
- Lev D, Daniely M, Zudik A et al. Automatic scanning of interphase FISH for prenatal diagnosis in uncultured amniocytes. Genet. Test.9(1), 41–47 (2005).
- Choolani M, Ho SS, Razvi K et al. FastFISH: technique for ultrarapid fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniocytes yielding results within 2 h of amniocentesis. Mol. Hum. Reprod.13(6), 355–359 (2007).
- Held KR. QS Zytogenetik Bericht 2002/2003. Med. Genet.15, 420–421 (2003).
- Liehr T, Ziegler M. Rapid prenatal diagnostics in the interphase nucleus: procedure and cut-off rates. J. Histochem. Cytochem.53(3), 289–291 (2005).
- Hulten MA, Dhanjal S, Pertl B. Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR. Reproduction126(3), 279–297 (2003).
- Liehr T, Beensen V, Hauschild R et al. Pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnosis using the interphase nucleus. Prenat. Diagn.21(5), 419–421 (2001).
- Liehr T, Schreyer I, Neumann A et al. Two more possible pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnostics using interphase nuclei. Prenat. Diagn.22(3), 497–499 (2002).
- Xu J, Mak L, Jung J. Amniotic fluid with an inconclusive result by interphase FISH and 45,X by routine G-banding turned out to have 46,X,+ mar.ish der(X)(DXZ1+). Prenat. Diagn.27(13), 1258–1259 (2007).
- Liehr T, Starke H, Beensen V et al. Translocation trisomy dup(21q) and free trisomy 21 can be distinguished by interphase-FISH. Int. J. Mol. Med.3(1), 11–14 (1999).