Cultural issues in assessing quality of life in cancer clinical trials

References

• Kong SX, Gandhi SK. Methodological assessments of quality of life measures in clinical trials. Ann. Pharmacother 31 (7-8), 830–836 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moinpour CM. Do quality of life assessments make a difference in the evaluation of cancer treatments? Control Clin. Trials. 18,311–317 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Moinpur CM. Measuring quality of life: an emerging science. Semin. Oncol. 5\(Suppl. 10), 48–60 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Mandelblatt JS, Eisenberg JM. Historical and methodological perspectives on cancer outcomes research. Oncology 9(11 Suppl.), 23–32 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Stark D, Selby P. Quality of Life Instruments in Oncology. Eur.Cancer35(11), 1571–1580 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Bottomley A. Quality of Life Assessment. Applied Clinical Trials January 1–5 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1, 277–299 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau P. Spirituality and the dying patient. j Clin. Oncol. 18(9), 2000–2002 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Blazeby JM. Measurement of outcome. Surg. Oncol. 10(3) 127–133 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis MP Patient satisfaction scales: a third dimension to the assessment of the care of advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 10(1), 1–2 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C et al. Timing of patient satisfaction assessment: effect on questionnaire acceptability, completeness of data, reliability and variability of scores. Patient Educ. Couns. 46(2), 131–136 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corless IB, Nicholas PK, Nokes KM. Issues in cross-cultural quality of life research. Nurs. Scholmsh. 33(1), 15–20 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Skevington SM, Tucker C. Designing response scales for cross-cultural use: data and experience from the development of the UK WHOQOL. Bi j Med. Psych& 72,51–61 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt SM. Cross-cultural issues in the use of quality of life measures in randomised controlled clinical trials. In: Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials — Methods, and Practice. Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM 14Hunt SM. Cross-cultural issues in the use of quality of life measures in randomised controlled clinical trials. In: Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials — Methods and Practice. Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM (Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Lent L, Hahn E, Eremenco S, Webster K, Cella D. Using cross-cultural input to adapt the functional assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) scales. Acta Oncol. 38, 695–702 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft RE, Chadwick DW, Clark SR, Edwards RH, Frith L, Hutton JL. Implications of socio-cultural contexts for the ethics of clinical trials. Health TechnoL Assess.1 (9), 1–65 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Eremenco S, Chang CH, Lent L, Cella D. Methods for cross-cultural adaptation of health outcomes measures. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (Arlington, VA, USA, May 21–24), 56 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Gandek BL, Keller SD and the IQOLA Project Group. Evaluating instruments used cross-nationally: methods from the IQOLA project. In: Quality of Life and Pharmaeconomics in Clinical Trials. Spiker B (Ed.), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 681–692 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Ware J. Translating functional health and well-being: International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project studies of the SF-36 health survey. Clin. Epidemiol. 122(7), 514–520 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Hanestad BR. Review of MOS SF-36. In: Cross-cultural health outcome assessment — a users guide Hutchison A, Bentzen N, Ksnig-Zahn C (Eds), 60–88 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Verdier A. Adaptation of health status measures — a discussion of mean approaches with special attention to the IQOLA methodology. Paper presented at the International Society of Behavioural Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et aL The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Natl Cancer Inst. 85 (5), 356–375 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. QuaL Life Res. 7(4), 323–335 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Payers PM. Interpreting quality of life data: population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur. J Cancer 37, 1331–1334 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz R, Hinz A. Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. Eur. Cancer 37,1345–1351 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, Alonso J, Bucquet D, Niero M, Wilklund I, McKenna SL. Cross-cultural adaptation of the health outcomes. Health Policy 19,33–44 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen SR, Mount BM, Strobel MG, Bui F. The McGill quality of life questionnaire: a measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliat. Med. 9, 207–129 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Lo RSK, Woo J, Zhoc KCH et al. Crosscultural validation of the McGill quality of life questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese. Palliat. Med. 15, 387–397 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power M, Bullinger M, Harper, The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group: The World Health Organization WHOQOL-1000: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health PsychoL 18(5), 494–505 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Hui C, Triandis HC. Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategies. Cross Cultural Psychology 16, 131–152 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 46(12), 1417–1431 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. ‘Equivalence’ and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Qual. Life Res. 6, 237–247 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA et al. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual. Life Res. 5(3), 309–320 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorius, N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. In: Quality of Life Assessment: international perspectives. Orley J, Kuyken W (Eds), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 3–19 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Holme J. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Longmans, London, UK (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Berkanovic E. The effect of inadequate language translation on Hispanics' responses to health surveys. Am. J Public Health 70,1273–1276 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG. The EORTC modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology. Int. J Mental Health 23 (2), 75–96 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, Aaronson NK. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group: Translation procedure. (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Sprangers M, Cull A, Groenvold M. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group: Guideline for developing questionnaire modules. (2nd edition), (1998).
   Google Scholar
• ••Interesting document that gives guidelines to developing a QoL instrument with special attention to establishing cross-cultural equivalency.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Kanda K. Translation and validation of the standard Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. QuaL Life Res. 9,129–137 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Hernandez L, Bonomi AE et al. Spanish translation and initial validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy quality of life instrument. Med. Care 36(9), 1407–1418 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotti P, Lugli D, Vaccher E, Vidotto G, Franchin G, Barzan L. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire-head and neck 35 in Italian laryngectomized patients. QuaL Life Res. 9(10), 1147–1153 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mullin V, Cella D, Chang C-H et al. Development of three African language translations of the FACT-G. QuaL Life Res. 9,139–149 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Useful paper that describes some problems in translation and compliancy.
   Google Scholar
• Yu CLM, Fielding R, Chan CLW et al. Measuring quality of life of Chinese cancer patients. Am. Cancer Soc. 88(7), 1715–1727 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi K, Takeda F, Termukai S et al. A cross-validation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with Lung Cancer. Eur. I Cancer34(6), 810–815 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner AK, Gandek B, Aaronson NK et aL Cross-cultural applications of the content of the SF-36 translations across 10 countries: results from the IQOLA project. J Clin. Epidemiol 51(191), 925–932 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Groenvold M, Bjørner JB, Klee MC, Kreiner S. Test for item bias in a quality of life questionnaire. j Clin. Epidemiol 48, 805–816 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Interesting paper that describes a procedure for detecting item bias in questionnaires.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech R Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. Clin. Epidemiol 11,1189–1202 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Bjørner JB, Kreiner S, Ware, JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech P Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. j Clin. Epidemiol 11, 1001–1011 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Morales LS, Reisse SR Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med. Care 38 (Suppl.), 11-28-11-42 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A. Rasch perspectives on cross- cultural validity. Technical report, Rheumatology & Rehabilitation Studies. Health-related quality of life conference (ESRC), Nuffield College, Oxford University, UK (2000).
   Google Scholar
• •Easy-to-read paper on item response theory with application to QoL measures.
   Google Scholar
• Custers JW, Hoijtink H, van der Net J, Helders PJ. Cultural differences in functional status measurement: analyses of person fit according to the Rasch model. Qua]. Life Res. 9(5), 571–578 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Leyland AH, Goldstein H. Multilevel modelling of health statistics. Wiley, New York, NY, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Gordon C. The effect of cancer pain on quality of life in different ethnic groups: a literature review. Nurse Pract. Forum 8(1), 5–13 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Futchett G, Mo M, Cella D. A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psychooncology 8,417–428 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Modern text that tackles ideas onspirituality.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton SP, Levine EG, Fitzpatrick CM, Dold KH, Targ E. Exploring the relationships among spiritual well-being, quality of life and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 8,429–438 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad J. Ethnicity Disability and Chronic Illness. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK (2000)
   Google Scholar
• Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer A. Health-related quality of life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Med. Care. 38 (9), 102–124 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Very timely paper addressing ethnicminority groups.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett A. Health needs of asylum seekers and refuges. Br. Med. j 544–547 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• MacBeth H, Shetty P. Health and Ethnicity: Published Symposia of the Society for the Study of Human Biology 41. Taylor and Francis, London, UK (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Angel R, Thoits P The impact of culture on the cognitive structure of illness. Cult. Med. Psychiatryll, 465–494 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Raczynski JM, Taylor H, Cutter G, Hardin M, Rappaport N, Oberman A. Diagnoses, symptoms and attribution of symptoms among black and white in-patients admitted for coronary heart disease. Am. Public Health 84,951–965 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger N, Rowley DL, Herman AA, Avery B, Phillips MT. Racism, sexism and social class: Implications for studies of health disease and well-being. Am. j Prey. Med 9(Suppl.), 82–122 (1993).
   Google Scholar