References
- Banta HD, Luce BR. Health Care Technology and Its Assessment: An International Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, USA (1993).
- Facey K. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Glossary. INAHTA Secretariat, c/o SBU, Stockholm, Sweden (2006).
- Diaby V, Laurier C, Lachaine J. A proposed framework for formulary listing in low-income countries: Incorporating key features from established drug benefit plans. Pharmaceut. Med. 25(2), 71–82 (2011).
- Johnson-Masotti AP, Eva K. A decision-making framework for the prioritization of health technologies. In: Health Services Restructuring in Canada: New Evidence and New Directions. Beach CM, Chaykowski RP, Shortt S, St-Hilaire F, Sweetman A ( Eds). John Deutsch Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, USA, 59–81 (2006).
- Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 4, 14 (2006).
- Emami M, Nazari K, Fardmanesh H. Application of fuzzy TOPSIS technique for strategic management decision. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 2(1), 685–689 (2012).
- Chen SH, Lee HT, Wu YF. Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance. Manag. Decis. 46(3), 449–465 (2008).
- Deshmukh A, Millet I. An analytic hierarchy process approach to assessing the risk of management fraud. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 15(1), 87–102 (1998).
- Dey PK. Decision support system for risk management: a case study. Manag. Decis. 39(8), 634–649 (2001).
- Baykasoglu A, Owen S, Gindy N. A taboo search based approach to find the Pareto optimal set in multiple objective optimization. Eng. Optim. 31(6), 731–748 (1999).
- Celano G, Fichera S, Grasso V, La Commare U, Perrone G. An evolutionary approach to multi-objective scheduling of mixed model assembly lines. Comput. Ind. Eng. 37(1), 69–73 (1999).
- Clímaco JCN, Antunes CH. TRIMAP - an interactive tricriteria linear programming package. Found. Control Eng. 12(3), 101–120 (1988).
- Alvarez-Guerra M, Canis L, Voulvoulis N, Viguri JR, Linkov I. Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 408(20), 4354–4367 (2010).
- Linkov I, Varghese A, Jamil S et al. Multicriteria decision analysis: a framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites. In: Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making. Linkov I, Ramadan A ( Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 15–54 (2004).
- Linkov I, Bates ME, Canis LJ, Seager TP, Keisler JM. A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 784–787 (2011).
- Thokala P, Duenas A. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment. Value Health 15(8), 1172–1181 (2012).
- Danner M, Hummel JM, Volz F et al. Integrating patients’ views into health technology assessment: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 27(4), 369–375 (2011).
- Husereau D, Boucher M, Noorani H. Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 26(3), 341–347 (2010).
- Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Evidence and Value: impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Serv. Res. 8, 270 (2008).
- Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Gregoire JP, Deal C. Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 8, 4 (2010).
- Miot J, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Goetghebeur MM. Field testing of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for coverage of a screening test for cervical cancer in South Africa. Cost Eff Resour. Alloc. 10(1), 2 (2012).
- Dolan JG. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: a primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient 3(4), 229–248 (2010).
- Belton V, Stewart TJ. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA (2002).
- Checkland P, Poulter J. Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its Use Practitioners, Teachers and Students. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA (2006).
- Neves LP, Dias LC, Antunes CH, Martins AG. Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: a case study in energy efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3), 834–845 (2009).
- Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trandoffs. Wiley, NY, USA (1976).
- Yoon K, Hwang CL. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA (1995).
- Ioan CA, Ioan G. A method of choice of the best alternative in the multiple solutions case in the Games Theory. J. Account. Manag. 1(1), 5–8 (2011).
- McIver JP, Carmines EG. Unidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA (1981).
- Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics 26(8), 661–677 (2008).
- Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 2(1), 55–64 (2003).
- Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best--worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J. Health Econ. 26(1), 171–189 (2007).
- Catrinu MD. Decision Aid for Planning Local Energy Systems: Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [Dissertation]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (2006).
- Goodwin P, Wright G. Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (2004).
- Keeney RL. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1992).
- Dias LC, Clímaco JN. Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(9), 1070–1082 (2000).
- Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer Verlag, Boston, MA, USA (2005).
- Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory Decis. 31, 49–73 (1991).
- Roy B, Bouyssou D. Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris, France (1993).
- Scharlig A. Décider Sur Plusieurs Critères: Panorama de L’aide à la Décision Multicritère. Presses Polytechnique et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland (1985).
- Younes AA, Azibi R, Roy B. ELECTRE IS: Manuel D’utilisation, LAMSADE, Paris-Dauphine University, Paris (2000)
- Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. Department of Health, London, UK (2010).
- Devlin NJ. The economics of a ‘liberated’ NHS. Pharmacoeconomics 28(12), 1075–1078 (2010).
- A New Value-Based Approach to the Pricing of Branded Medicines – A Consultation. Department of Health, London, UK (2010).
- Sussex J, Towse A, Devlin N. Operationalizing value-based pricing of medicines: a taxonomy of approaches. Pharmacoeconomics 31(1), 1–10 (2013).
Websites
- About the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee. www.hqontario.ca/evidence/evidence-process/about-the-ontario-health-technology-advisory-committee
- Decision-making framework (decision determinants). www.hqontario.ca/evidence/evidence-process/evidence-review-process/decision-making-framework