References
- Nord E, Pinto-Prades JL, Richardson J, Menzel P, Ubel P. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Econ. 8, 25–39 (1999).
- Ubel PA, Nord E, Gold M, Menzel P, Pinto-Prades JL, Richardson J. Improving value measurement in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med. Care 38(9), 892–901 (2000).
- Pinto-Prades JL. Is the person trade-off a valid method for allocating healthcare resources? Health Econ. 6(1), 71–81 (1997).
- Baron J, Ubel PA. Types of inconsistency in health-state utility judgments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 89(2), 1100–1118 (2002).
- Nord E. Veiledende verditall for kostnadnytteanalyser av helsetjenester (A value table for cost-value analysis of healthcare). J. Norwegian Med. Ass. 116, 3246–3249 (1996).
- Nord E. In: Cost-value Analysis in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1999).
- Payne JJ, Bettman D, Schkade A. Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. J. Risk Uncertain. 19, 243–270 (1999).
- Knight FH. In: Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Sentry Press, NY, USA (1921).
- Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am. Econ. Rev. 3, 941–973 (1963).
- von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. In: Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press, NJ, USA (1944).
- Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979).
- Friedman M, Savage LP. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Polit. Econ. 56, 279–304 (1948).
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481), 453–458 (1981).
- Pinto JL. Is the person tradeoff a valid method for allocating healthcare resources? Health Econ. 6, 71–81 (1997).
- Ellsberg D. Classic and current notions of ‘measurable utility’. Econ. J. 64, 528–556 (1954).
- Krantz DH, Luce RD, Suppes P, Tversky A. Foundations of measurement. In: Additive and Polynomial Representations. Vol. 1. Academic Press, NY, USA (1971).
- Bell EE, Raiffa H. Marginal value and intrinsic risk attitude. In: A Seminar Series Risk.H. Kunreuther (Ed.). 325–349 (1982).
- Dyer JS, Sarin RK. Relative risk aversion. Manag. Science 28, 875–886 (1982).
- Sarin RK. Strength of preference and risky choice. Operations Res. 30, 982–997 (1982).
- Schoemaker PJH. The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. J. Econ. Lit. 20, 529–563 (1982).
- Wakker PP. Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory Decis. 36, 1–66 (1994).
- Salomon JA, Murray CJ. A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations. Health Econ. 13(3), 281–290 (2004).
- Slovic P. The construction of preference. Am. Psychol. 50, 364–371 (1995).
- Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Wakker PP. Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve prescriptive applications of expected utility. Manag. Science 47, 1498–1514 (2001).
Websites
- George Mason University. Decision Analysis for Healthcare www.gunston.doit.gmu.edu/healthscience/730/default.asp (Accessed November 2005)
- Up-to-date, annotated bibliography of work in utility modeling. Created and curated by Peter Walker. www1.fee.uva.nl/creed/wakker/refs/rfrncs.htm (Accessed November 2005)