Quality of life in older people: a structured review of self-assessed health instruments

References

• Freedman V, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 288, 3137–3146 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries JF. Successful aging – an emerging paradigm of gerontology. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 18, 371–382 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey A, Barker M, McGee H, O’Boyle C. Measuring health-related quality of life in older patient populations: a review of current approaches Pharmacoeconomics23, 971–993 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood K, Garratt A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Qual. Life Res. 14, 1651–1668 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood K, Garratt A, Fitzpatrick R. Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self assessed instruments. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 11, 315–327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Macintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. Br. Med. J. 324, 1417–1421 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol. Assess. 2, 1–80 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford, UK (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J. Clin. Epidemiol.53, 459–468 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sridhar FG, Guyatt GH, Walter SD. Relation of distribution and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Med. Care 39, 1039–1047 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson EC, Wasson J, Kirk J et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J. Chronic Dis. 40(Suppl. 1), 55S–63S (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landgraf JM, Nelson EC. Dartmouth COOP primary care network. Summary of the WONCA/COOP international health assessment field trial. Aust. Fam. Physician 21, 255–269 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jette AM, Davies AR, Cleary PD et al. The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 1, 143–149 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibblin G, Tibblin B, Peciva S, Kullman S, Svardsudd K. The Goteborg Quality of Life Instrument – an assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 8(Suppl. 1), 33–38 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Bowling A, Windsor J. Discriminative power of the health status questionnaire 12 in relation to age, sex, and long-standing illness: findings from a survey of households in Great Britain. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 51, 564–573 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 34, 281–286 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life index: development and psyshometric properties. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 8, 15–24 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM, Rothenberg BM, Kaplan RM. Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the quality of well-being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Med. Care 36, 1349–1360 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Second Edition, Boston, MA, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD, Davies AR. Developing and testing the MOS 20-Item Short-Form Health Survey: A general population application. In: Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: the Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Stewart AL, Ware JE (Eds). Duke University Press, Durham, NC,USA 277–290 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide (2nd Edition). The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre. Nimrod Press, MA, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Kazis LE, Miller DR, Skinner KM et al. Patient-reported measures of health: the Veterans Health Study. J. Ambul. Care Manage. 27, 70–83 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB et al. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med. Care 19, 787–805 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-Index for use by physicians. J. Chronic Dis. 34, 585–597 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naumann VJ, Byrne GJA.WHOQOL-BREF as a measure of quality of life in older patients with depression. Int. Psychogeriatr. 16,159–173 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S, the WHOQoL-OLD Group. Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module. Qual. Life Res. 14, 2197–2214 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R, McNeil H. The Australian Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument; initial validation. Working Paper 66. Centre for Health Program Evaluation. Monash University and the University of Melbourne, Australia (1997).
   Google Scholar
• The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16, 199–208 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems: health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics7, 490–502 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser R, Cottee M, Rabin R, Selai C. Chapter 7: Index of health-related quality of life. In: Measures of the quality of life and the uses to which such measures may be put. Hopkins A (Ed.). Royal College of Physicians, London, UK (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv. Res. 23, 203–235 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeeth L, Fletcher AE, Stirling S et al. Randomised comparison of three methods of administering a screening questionnaire to elderly people: findings from the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community. Br. Med. J. 323, 1403–1407 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurland B, Kuriansky J, Sharpe L, Simon R, Stiller P, Birkett P. The comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE) - rationale, development and reliability. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 8, 9–42 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurland B, Golden R, Teresi J, Challop J. The SHORT-CARE: an efficient instrument for the assessment of depression, dementia and disability. J. Gerontol. 39, 166–169 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde M, Wiggins RD, Higgs P, Blane DB. A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment. Health 7, 186–194 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp I, Newton P, McKee KJ, Dixon S, Rowse G, Bath PA. Geriatric assessment in primary care: formulating best practice. Br. J. Community Nurs. 6, 290–295 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeiffer E, Johnson TM, Chiofolo RC. Functional assessment of elderly subjects in four service settings. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 29, 433–437 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessi CA, Josephson KR, Harker JO, Pietruszka FM, Hoyl MT, Rubenstein LZ. The yield, reliability, and validity of a postal survey for screening community-dwelling older people. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 51, 194–202 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FernandezBuergo AM, Esnaola S, Esquisabel R et al. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for screening older people for comprehensive geriatric assessment. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 8, 50–55 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Morris WW, Buckwalter KC, Cleary A, Gilmer JS, Hatz DL, Studer M. Issues related to the validation of the Iowa Self-assessment Inventory. J. Ed. Psychological Measurement 49, 853–861 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leo D, Diekstra RFW, Lonnqvist J et al. LEIPAD; an internationally applicable instrument to assess quality of life in the elderly. Behav. Med. 24, 17–27 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breithaupt K, McDowell I. Considerations for measuring functioning of the elderly: IRM dimensionality and scaling analysis. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol.2, 37–50 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Reker GT, Wong PT. Psychological and physical well-being in the elderly: the Perceived Well-Being Scale (PWB). Can. J. Aging 3, 23–32 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Moss M, Fulcomer M, Kleban MH. A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. J. Gerontol. 37, 91–99 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rai GS, Kelland P, Rai SGS, Wientjes HJFM. Quality of life cards – a novel way to measure quality of life in the elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 21, 285–289 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S, Gately C, Huxley C, Smith A, Banerjee S. Assessment of quality of life in later life: development and validation of the QuiLL. Qual. Life Res. 14, 1291–1300 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael D, Brown I, Renwick R, Cava M, Weir N, Heathcote K. The quality of life of seniors living in the community: a conceptualization with implications for public health practice. Can. J. Public Health 86, 228–233 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvimaki A, Stenbock-Hult HB. Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well-being, meaning and value. J. Adv. Nurs. 32, 1025–1033 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn MW, Linn BS. Self-evaluation of life function (self) scale: a short, comprehensive self-report of health for elderly adults. J. Gerontol. 39, 603–612 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stones MJ, Kozma A. Multidimensional assessment of the elderly via a microcomputer: the SENOTS program and battery. Psychol. Aging 4, 113–118 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slivinske LR, Fitch VL, Morawski DP. The Wellness Index: developing an instrument to assess elders’ well-being. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 25, 185–204 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Eagle DJ, Sackett B et al. Measuring quality of life in the frail elderly. J. Clin. Epidemiol.46, 1433–1444 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully MP, Cantrill JA.The test-retest reliability of the modified Patient Generated Index. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 7, 81–89 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bidewell J, Ledwidge H, Tan L. Active, retired persons’ quality of life explored using Repertory Grid. Geriatrician21, 10–17 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• McKee KJ, Houston DM, Barnes S. Methods for assessing quality of life and well-being in frail older people. Psychol. Health. 17, 737–751 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler D. Declining disability among the elderly. Health Affairs20, 11–27 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fries J. Measuring and monitoring success in compressing morbidity. Ann. Intern. Med. 139, 455–459 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy New York, Oxford University Press, UK (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Hendry F, McVittie C. Is quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older people. Qual. Health Res. 14, 961–975 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A, Dieppe B. What is successful ageing and who should define it? Br. Med. J. 331, 1548–1551 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal I, Lewis J Flynn T et al. Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Soc. Sci. Med. (2005) (In Press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. JAMA 272, 619–626 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Second Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Parker SG, Peet SM, Jagger C, Farhan M, Castleden CM. Measuring health status in older patients. The SF-36 in practice. Age Ageing 27, 13–18 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahony PG, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Dobson R, James OF. Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? Age Ageing 27, 19–22 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadnyk K, Calder J, Rockwood K. Testing the measurement properties of the short form-36 health survey in a frail elderly population J. Clin. Epidemiol.51, 827–835 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne RH, Hawthorne G, Lew EA, Gray LC. Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly Validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36. J. Clin. Epidemiol.56, 138–147 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe S, Guyatt G, Weaver B, Matijevic S, Sidwell C. Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. J. Clin. Epidemiol.56, 52–60 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugwell P, Boers M. Developing consensus on preliminary core efficacy endpoints for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J. Rheumatol. 20, 555–556 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary P. Functional disability screening of ambulatory patients: a randomized controlled trial in a hospital-based group practice. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 10, 590–592 (1994)
   Google Scholar
• Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 714–724 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc. Sci. Med. 60, 833–843 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball A, Russell EM, Seymour DG, Primrose WR, Garratt AM. Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities. Can proxies be used to complete the SF-36? Gerontology47, 334–340 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar