Cardiac MRI in the treatment of arrhythmias

References

• Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM et al.; European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); American College of Cardiology (ACC); American Heart Association (AHA). EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm 6(6), 886–933 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 4(6), 816–861 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48(5), e247–e346 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong J, Dickfeld T, Dalal D et al. Initial experience in the use of integrated electroanatomic mapping with three-dimensional MR/CT images to guide catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 17(5), 459–466 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Desjardins B, Baman T et al. Delayed-enhanced MR scar imaging and intraprocedural registration into an electroanatomical mapping system in post-infarction patients. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 5(2), 207–210 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlcochová H, Tintera J, Porod V, Peichl P, Cihák R, Kautzner J. Magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary veins: implications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 28(10), 1073–1080 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch TJ, Day JD. Novel ablative approach for atrial fibrillation to decrease risk of esophageal injury. Heart Rhythm 5(4), 624–627 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55(23), 2614–2662 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewton N, Liu CY, Croisille P, Bluemke D, Lima JA. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57(8), 891–903 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 218(1), 215–223 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee VS. Cardiovascular MRI: physical principles to practical protocols. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PA, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bello D, Fieno DS, Kim RJ et al. Infarct morphology identifies patients with substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 45(7), 1104–1108 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian S, Bluemke DA, Lardo AC et al. Magnetic resonance assessment of the substrate for inducible ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 112(18), 2821–2825 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins B, Crawford T, Good E et al. Infarct architecture and characteristics on delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping in patients with postinfarction ventricular arrhythmia. Heart Rhythm 6(5), 644–651 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashikaga H, Sasano T, Dong J et al. Magnetic resonance-based anatomical analysis of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: implications for catheter ablation. Circ. Res. 101(9), 939–947 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Marrouche NF, Schweikert RA et al. Relationship between successful ablation sites and the scar border zone defined by substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia post-myocardial infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 16(5), 465–471 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estner HL, Zviman MM, Herzka D et al. The critical isthmus sites of ischemic ventricular tachycardia are in zones of tissue heterogeneity, visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm 8(12), 1942–1949 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreu D, Berruezo A, Ortiz-Pérez JT et al. Integration of 3D electroanatomic maps and magnetic resonance scar characterization into the navigation system to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 4(5), 674–683 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 115(15), 2006–2014 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roes SD, Borleffs CJ, van der Geest RJ et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2(3), 183–190 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan AT, Shayne AJ, Brown KA et al. Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality. Circulation 114(1), 32–39 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyé P, Abdel-Aty H, Zacharzowsky U et al. Prediction of life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with chronic myocardial infarction by contrast-enhanced CMR. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4(8), 871–879 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann CJ, Kholmovski EG, Oakes RS et al. New magnetic resonance imaging-based method for defining the extent of left atrial wall injury after the ablation of atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52(15), 1263–1271 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DC, Wylie JV, Hauser TH et al. Detection of pulmonary vein and left atrial scar after catheter ablation with three-dimensional navigator-gated delayed enhancement MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 243(3), 690–695 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badger TJ, Daccarett M, Akoum NW et al. Evaluation of left atrial lesions after initial and repeat atrial fibrillation ablation: lessons learned from delayed-enhancement MRI in repeat ablation procedures. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 3(3), 249–259 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 119(13), 1758–1767 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz J, Horvilleur J, Lacotte J et al. Correlation between AF substrate ablation difficulty and left atrial fibrosis quantified by delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 34(10), 1267–1277 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation 114(12), 1277–1284 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur. Radiol. 13(11), 2409–2418 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Adriaenssens T, Dymarkowski S, Desmet W, Bogaert J. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2(7), 825–831 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D et al. Detection of myocardial involvement in patients with sarcoidosis applying T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced, and cine magnetic resonance imaging: initial results of a prospective study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 26(5), 762–767 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al.; International Consensus Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC White Paper. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53(17), 1475–1487 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty H, Cocker M, Strohm O, Filipchuk N, Friedrich MG. Abnormalities in T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance images of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: regional distribution and relation to late gadolinium enhancement and severity of hypertrophy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28(1), 242–245 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad SK, Pennell DJ. Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices. Heart 90(11), 1241–1244 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian S, Hansford R, Roguin A et al. A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(7), 415–424 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naehle CP, Strach K, Thomas D et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5-T in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54(6), 549–555 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43(7), 1315–1324 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinbane JS, Colletti PM, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of ‘MR conditional’ designs. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 13, 63 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinart R, Nazarian S. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted devices. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 23(9), 1040–1042 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Hansford R, Zviman MM et al. Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 4(6), 662–670 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickfeld T, Tian J, Ahmad G et al. MRI-Guided ventricular tachycardia ablation: integration of late gadolinium-enhanced 3D scar in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 4(2), 172–184 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarian S, Kolandaivelu A, Zviman MM et al. Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging for catheter guidance in electrophysiology studies. Circulation 118(3), 223–229 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt EJ, Mallozzi RP, Thiagalingam A et al. Electroanatomic mapping and radiofrequency ablation of porcine left atria and atrioventricular nodes using magnetic resonance catheter tracking. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2(6), 695–704 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara GR, Vijayakumar S, Kholmovski EG et al. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiofrequency atrial ablation and visualization of lesion formation at 3 Tesla. Heart Rhythm 8(2), 295–303 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann BA, Koops A, Rostock T et al. Interactive real-time mapping and catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus guided by magnetic resonance imaging in a porcine model. Eur. Heart J. 31(4), 450–456 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordbeck P, Beer M, Köstler H et al. Cardiac catheter ablation under real-time magnetic resonance guidance. Eur. Heart J. 33(15), 1977 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer P, Grothoff M, Eitel C et al. Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrophysiology studies in humans. Europace 15(1), 101–108 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar