Emerging role of multimodality imaging in management of inflammatory pericardial diseases

References

• Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL. Pericarditis. Lancet 363, 717–727 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srichai MB. CMR imaging in constrictive pericarditis: is seeing believing? JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 1192–1194 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurick AO, Bolen MA, Kwon DH et al. Pericardial delayed hyperenhancement with CMR imaging in patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing surgical pericardiectomy: a case series with histopathological correlation. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 1180–1191 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisch B, Seferovic PM, Ristic AD et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases executive summary; The Task force on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European society of cardiology. Eur. Heart J. 25, 587–610 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, Maksimovic R et al. Pericardial syndromes: an update after the ESC guidelines 2004. Heart Fail. Rev. 18, 255–266 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagrista-Sauleda J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Candell-Riera J, Angel J, Soler-Soler J. Transient cardiac constriction: an unrecognized pattern of evolution in effusive acute idiopathic pericarditis. Am. J. Cardiol. 59, 961–966 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh JK, Hatle LK, Mulvagh SL, Tajik AJ. Transient constrictive pericarditis: diagnosis by two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. Mayo Clin. Proc. 68, 1158–1164 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley JH, Tajik AJ, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Mulvagh SL, Oh JK. Transient constrictive pericarditis: causes and natural history. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 271–275 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush CA, Stang JM, Wooley CF, Kilman JW. Occult constrictive pericardial disease. Diagnosis by rapid volume expansion and correction by pericardiectomy. Circulation 56, 924–930 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell HB. Problems in the recognition and treatment of pericarditis. J. Lancet 74, 465–470 (1954).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spodick DH, Kumar S. Subacute constrictive pericarditis with cardiac tamponade. Dis. Chest 54, 62–66 (1968).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hancock EW. Subacute effusive-constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 43, 183–192 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazio M. Treatment of recurrent pericarditis. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 10, 1165–1172 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imazio M. Contemporary management of pericardial diseases. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 27, 308–317 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazio M, Spodick DH, Brucato A, Trinchero R, Adler Y. Controversial issues in the management of pericardial diseases. Circulation 121, 916–928 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotrionte M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Imazio M et al. International collaborative systematic review of controlled clinical trials on pharmacologic treatments for acute pericarditis and its recurrences. Am. Heart J. 160, 662–670 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artom G, Koren-Morag N, Spodick DH et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids attenuates the efficacy of colchicine in preventing recurrent pericarditis: a multi-centre all-case analysis. Eur. Heart J. 26, 723–727 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task F, American Society of E, American Heart A et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57, 1126–1166 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal-Bianco JP, Sengupta PP, Mookadam F, Chandrasekaran K, Tajik AJ, Khandheria BK. Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 22, 24–33; quiz 103–104 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta PP, Krishnamoorthy VK, Abhayaratna WP et al. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 1, 29–38 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, Yeh BM, Hetts SW, Higgins CB. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics 23 Spec No, S167–S180 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama F, Fultz PJ, Wandtke JC. Comparing thin-section and thick-section CT of pericardial sinuses and recesses. Am. J. Roentgenol. 181, 1101–118 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter P, Figiel JH, Rupp TP, Bachmann GF, Maisch B, Rominger MB. MR, CT, and PET imaging in pericardial disease. Heart Fail. Rev. 18, 289–306 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary SM, Williams PL, Williams MP et al. Imaging the pericardium: appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac computed tomography. Br. J. Radiol. 83, 194–205 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong MT, Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW et al. Anatomy of pericardial recesses on multidetector CT: implications for oncologic imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 181, 1109–1113 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delille JP, Hernigou A, Sene V et al. Maximal thickness of the normal human pericardium assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. Eur. Radiol. 9, 1183–1189 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajiah P, Kanne JP. Computed tomography of the pericardium and pericardial disease. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 4, 3–18 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaert J, Duerinckx AJ. Appearance of the normal pericardium on coronary MR angiograms. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 5, 579–587 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation 108, 1852–1857 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spodick DH. Pericardial Macro- and Microanatomy: A Synopsis. Marcel Decker, New York, NY, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Ariyarajah V, Jassal DS, Kirkpatrick I, Kwong RY. The utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in constrictive pericardial disease. Cardiol. Rev. 17, 77–82 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. “Black blood” T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 199, 49–57 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francone M, Carbone I, Agati L et al. Utility of T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences in cardiac MRI: an overview of clinical applications in ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart disease. Radiol. Med. 116, 32–46 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ridgway JP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part I. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 12, 71 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogaert J, Francone M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 11, 14 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Friedrich MG. T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 13, 13 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walls MC, Verhaert D, Min JK, Raman SV. Myocardial edema imaging in acute coronary syndromes. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;34, 1243–1250 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wince WB, Kim RJ. Molecular imaging: T2-weighted CMR of the area at risk – a risky business? Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 7, 547–549 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards NC, Routledge H, Steeds RP. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess myocardial oedema in ischaemic heart disease. Heart 95, 1357–1361 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srichai MB. CMR imaging in constrictive pericarditis: is seeing believing? JACC Cardiovasc. Imag. 4, 1192–1194 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lange RA, Hillis LD. Clinical practice. Acute pericarditis. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 2195–2202 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. JAMA 289, 1150–1153 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman LB, Tinker WP, Kronzon I, Cohen ML, Glassman E, Spencer FC. The incidence and natural history of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery – an echocardiographic study. Circulation 69, 506–511 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle HP, Adolph RJ, Fowler NO, Engel P, Agruss NS, Levenson NI. Echocardiographic study of cardiac tamponade. Circulation 56, 951–959 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillam LD, Guyer DE, Gibson TC, King ME, Marshall JE, Weyman AE. Hydrodynamic compression of the right atrium: a new echocardiographic sign of cardiac tamponade. Circulation 68, 294–301 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: respiratory variation in transvalvular flow velocities studied by Doppler echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 11, 1020–1030 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 333–343 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomoda H, Hoshiai M, Furuya H et al. Evaluation of pericardial effusion with computed tomography. Am. Heart J. 99, 701–706 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama N, Komuro K, Nambu T, Manning WJ, Miyasaka K. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: anatomy and pathology. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 3, 145–152 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Restrepo CS, Lemos DF, Lemos JA et al. Imaging findings in cardiac tamponade with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 27, 1595–1610 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman PM, Harell GS, Korobkin M. Computed tomography of the abnormal pericardium. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 140, 1125–1129 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK, Bogaert J. Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur. Radiol. 16, 569–574 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A et al. T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 11, 56 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 269–278 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yared K, Baggish AL, Picard MH, Hoffmann U, Hung J. Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 650–660 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E et al. Colchicine in addition to conventional therapy for acute pericarditis: results of the COlchicine for acute PEricarditis (COPE) trial. Circulation 112, 2012–2016 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E et al. Colchicine as first-choice therapy for recurrent pericarditis: results of the CORE (COlchicine for REcurrent pericarditis) trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 1987–1991 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazio M, Brucato A, Cemin R et al. Colchicine for recurrent pericarditis (CORP): a randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 155, 409–414 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alraies MC, AlJaroudi WA, Tariq M et al. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance-guided management in patients with recurrent pericarditis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 61(10_S) (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 79, 357–370 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, Ares M, Griffin BP, Thomas JD, Klein AL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 27, 108–114 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan N, Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L et al. Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 87, 86–94 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha JW, Oh JK, Ling LH, Nishimura RA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Annulus paradoxus: transmitral flow velocity to mitral annular velocity ratio is inversely proportional to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 104, 976–978 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuss CS, Wilansky SM, Lester SJ et al. Using mitral 'annulus reversus' to diagnose constrictive pericarditis. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 10, 372–375 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusunose K, Dahiya A, Popovic ZB et al. Biventricular mechanics in constrictive pericarditis comparison with restrictive cardiomyopathy and impact of pericardiectomy. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 6, 399–406 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamdar AR, Meadows TA, Roselli EE et al. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reoperative cardiothoracic surgery. Ann. Thorac Surg. 85, 1239–1245 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus D ocuments; Hundley WG, Bluemke DA et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55, 2614–2662 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulen RL, Stark DD, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of constrictive pericardial disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 55, 480–484 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers RB, Spodick DH. Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics. Am. Heart J. 138, 219–232 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh KY, Shimizu M, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, Danielson GK. Surgical pathology of the parietal pericardium: a study of 344 cases (1993–1999). Cardiovasc. Pathol. 10, 157–168 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 182, 369–373 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima S, Yamada N, Goto Y. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 373–374 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M, Rademakers FE, Bogaert J. Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Eur. Radiol. 16, 944–951 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquier A, Prost C, Amabile N et al. Gadolinium chelate kinetics in cardiac MR imaging of myocarditis: comparison to acute myocardial infarction and impact on late gadolinium enhancement. Invest. Radiol. 46, 705–710 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100, 1992–2002 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK, Bogaert J. Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur. Radiol. 16, 569–574 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation 124, 1830–1837 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagrista-Sauleda J, Angel J, Sanchez A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 469–475 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CM, Orsinelli DA. Subacute effusive-constrictive pericarditis: diagnosis by serial echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 17, 1204–1206 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagol B, Minderman D, Munir A, D'Cruz I. Effusive constrictive pericarditis: 2D, 3D echocardiography and MRI imaging. Echocardiography 24, 1110–1114 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaert J, Francone M. Pericardial Disease: Value of CT and MR Imaging. Radiology 267, 340–356 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coylewright M, Welch TD, Nishimura RA. Mechanism of septal bounce in constrictive pericarditis: a simultaneous cardiac catheterisation and echocardiographic study. Heart 99(18), 1376 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahal NS, Lim TK, Jain P, Chambers JC, Kooner JS, Senior R. Normative reference values for the tissue Doppler imaging parameters of left ventricular function: a population-based study. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 11, 51–56 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 26, 965–1012 (2013).
   Google Scholar