Surgical revascularisation of the acute coronary artery syndrome

References

• Califf RM, Bengtson JR. Cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1994;330(24):1724-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013;127(4):529-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60(7):645-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012;33(20):2569-619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32(23):2999-3054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Unstable angina and NSTEMI: the early management of unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. CG94. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2010
   Google Scholar
• Carville S, Harker M, Henderson R, et al. Acute management of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2013;347:f4006
   Google Scholar
• Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010;31(20):2501-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senanayake EL, Howell NJ, Evans J, et al. Contemporary outcomes of urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery following non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery consistently outperforms Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events predicted survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41(5):e87-91. discussion e91-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med 2001;344(25):1879-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet 1999;354(9180):708-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet 2002;360(9335):743-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, et al. Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results. ERACI II investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37(1):51-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno H, Fernandez-Aviles F. Use of risk scores in acute coronary syndromes. Heart 2012;98(2):162-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang EW, Wong CK, Herbison P. Global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 2007;153(1):29-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro P. Impact of early coronary artery bypass graft in an unselected acute coronary syndrome patient population. Circulation 2006;114(1 Suppl):I467-72
   Google Scholar
• Harling L, Moscarelli M, Kidher E, et al. The effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass on mortality after acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013;169(5):339-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattouch K, Guccione F, Dioguardi P, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137(3):650-6. discussion 56-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastan AJ, Eckenstein JI, Hentschel B, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for acute coronary syndrome: beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic cardiac arrest strategies. Circulation 2006;114(1 Suppl):I477-85
   Google Scholar
• Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358(9285):870-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, et al. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 2001;141(6):933-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367(14):1287-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllmann J, Baretti R, Hetzer R. Mortality reduction with IABP prior to CABG in emergency patients with shock. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;61(S 01):P49
   Google Scholar
• Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O, Staupendahl L, et al. IABP therapy in patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting for acute coronary syndrome. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;60(S 01):PP53
   Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). Circulation 2004;110(5):588-636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genereux P, Bernard S, Palmerini T, et al. Incidence, predictors and the impact of stroke in acute coronary syndrome: insights from the ACUITY trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59(13 Suppl 1):E378-E78
   Google Scholar
• Fox KA, Anderson FA, Jr., Goodman SG, et al. Time course of events in acute coronary syndromes: implications for clinical practice from the GRACE registry. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008;5(9):580-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes]. Rev Port Cardiol 2008;27(9):1063-143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 2007;116(7):e148-304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRACE. Secondary 2013. Available from: www.outcomes-umassmed.org/grace/
   Google Scholar
• Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, et al. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(22):2435-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344(15):1117-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360(9338):965-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn J, Taggart DP. Revascularisation for acute coronary syndromes: PCI or CABG? Heart 2003;89(9):967-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Gal Y, Moses JW, Mehran R, et al. Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3(10):1059-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013;381(9867):629-38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson J, Flather MD, Fox KA, et al. Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK). Eur Heart J 2000;21(17):1450-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh SV, de Lemos JA, Jessen ME, et al. Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3(4):419-27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisine P, Mathieu P, Doyle D, et al. Influence of time elapsed between myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery on operative mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29(3):319-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135(3):503-11. 11 e1-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Chen J, et al. Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. BMJ 2009;338:b1807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2009;120(22):2271-306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, Ting W. Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2003;125:115-20; discussion 119-120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338(25):1785-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2008;358(6):557-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu YL, van der Horst IC, Douglas YL, et al. Role of coronary artery bypass grafting during the acute and subacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Neth Heart J 2010;18(7-8):348-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscarelli M, Harling L, Ashrafian H, et al. Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16(3):350-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger PB, Holmes DR Jr, Stebbins AL, et al. Impact of an aggressive invasive catheterization and revascularization strategy on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock in the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO-I) trial. An observational study. Circulation 1997;96(1):122-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JG, Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry. Am Heart Hosp J 2001;141(6):964-70
   Google Scholar
• Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation 2003;107(24):2998-3002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu FC, Chang SN, Lin JW, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138(6):1326-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prondzinsky R, Lemm H, Swyter M, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med 2010;38(1):152-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor CM, Rogers JG. Evidence for overturning the guidelines in cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367(14):1349-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyub AM, Whitlock RP, Abouzahr LL, et al. Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2008;23(1):79-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauten A, Engstrom AE, Jung C, et al. Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6(1):23-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzo-Silberman S, Fichet J, Mathonnet A, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5. Resuscitation 2013;84(5):609-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill WW, Schreiber T, Wohns DH, et al. The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry. J Interv Cardiol 2014;27(1):1-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345(7):494-502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361(11):1045-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373(9665):723-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357(20):2001-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao G, Zheng Z, Pi Y, et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(20):1639-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med 2013;368(14):1303-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar