Role of intravascular ultrasound in unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention

References

• Kaltenbach M, Kober G, Scherer D. Mechanical dilatation of coronary artery obstructions (transluminal angioplasty). Z Kardiol.69, 1–10 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Kappetein AP, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW et al. Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.29, 486–491 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan WA, Tamai H, Park SJ et al; ULTIMA Investigators. Long-term clinical outcomes after unprotected left main trunk percutaneous revascularization in 279 patients. Circulation104(14), 1609–1614 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SJ, Park SW, Hong MK et al. Long-term (three-year) outcomes after stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in patients with normal left ventricular function. Am. J. Cardiol.91, 12–16 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF et al; Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur. Heart J.26, 804–847 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe JH, Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD et al. Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures. Am. J. Cardiol.64, 144–147 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takagi T, Stankovic G, Finci L et al. Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation106, 698–702 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CH, Degertekin M, van Domburg RT et al. Impact of different anatomical patterns of left main coronary stenting on long-term survival. Am. J. Cardiol.92, 718–720 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco J, Fajadet J. Unprotected left main stenting. Paris course on revascularisation 2004, 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Chieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E et al. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation111, 791–795 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevre T. Left main lesions and how to deal with left main subsets. Presentation, Melbourne 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen SE, Yock P. Intravascular ultrasound. Novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation103, 604–616 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston PW, Forte S, Cohen EH. Noncritical disease of the left main coronary artery: limitations of angiography and the role of intravascular ultrasound. Can. J. Cardiol.15, 297–302 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J et al. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn.8, 565–575 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Cameron A, Kemp HG, Fisher LD et al. Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination. Circulation68, 484–489 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37, 1478–1492 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassa AA, Wagatsuma K, Higano ST et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment for angiographically indeterminate left main coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 204–211 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NHJ, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation92, 3183–3193 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech G J, Droste H, Pijls NH et al. Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease. Heart86, 547–552 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstaedt M, Yazar A, Germing A et al. Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery disease after deferral of surgical revascularization on the basis of fractional flow reserve measurements. Am. Heart J.152, 156e1–156e9 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation110, 2831–2836 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD et al. Limitations of angiography in the assessment of plaque distribution in coronary artery disease: a systematic study of target lesion eccentricity in 1446 lesions. Circulation93, 924–931 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SJ, Hong MK, Lee CW et al. Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.38, 1054–1060 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hong MK, Mintz GS, Hong MK et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of target lesion revascularization after stenting of protected left main coronary stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol.83, 175–179 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies-with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. RESIST Study Group. REStenosis after Ivus guided STenting. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.32, 320–328 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo RJ, Attubato MJ, Davidson CJ. Angiography vesrsus intravascular ultrasound-directed stent placement. Final results from AVID. Circulation100(Suppl. 1), I234 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P et al; OPTICUS (OPTimization with ICUS to reduce stent restenosis) Study Investigators. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation104, 1343–1349 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij MJ, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE; TULIP Study. Thrombocyte activity evaluation and effects of Ultrasound guidance in Long Intracoronary stent Placement. Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses: final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance (TULIP Study). Circulation107(1), 62–67 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation102, 523–530 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford JL, Denktas AE, Williams BA et al; PRESTO Investigators. Routine intravascular ultrasound scanning guidance of coronary stenting is not associated with improved clinical outcomes. Am. Heart J.148, 501–506 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Agostoni P, Valgimigli M, Van Mieghem CA et al. Comparison of early outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era with versus without intravascular ultrasonic guidance. Am. J. Cardiol.95, 644–647 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SJ, Kim YH, Lee BK et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with bare metal stent implantation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 351–356 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RA, Mintz GS, Carlier SG et al. Bifurcation coronary lesions treated with the “crush” technique. An intravascular ultrasound analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 599–605 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Park SW, Hong MK et al. Comparison of simple and complex stenting techniques in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol.97, 1597–1601 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iakouvo I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 1446–1455 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J et al. Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle. Am. Heart J.152, 762–769 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J et al; SIRIUS Investigators. Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the Sirius trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43, 1959–1963 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takebayashi H, Kobayashi Y, Mintz GS et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lesions with target vessel failure after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Am. J. Cardiol.95, 498–502 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Mintz GS et al. Predictors of subacute stent thrombosis: results of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation108, 43–47 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW et al. Late stent malapposition after drug-eluting stent implantation. An intravascular ultrasound analysis with long-term follow-up. Circulation113, 414–419 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong AT, Serruys PW, Mohr FW et al. The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. Am. Heart J.151, 1194–1204 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses JW, Stone GW, Nikolsky E et al. Drug-eluting stents in the treatment of intermediate lesions. Pooled analysis from four randomized trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47, 2164–2171 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O et al. Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47, 2405–2412 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Korte CL, van der Steen AF. Intravascular ultrasound elastography: an overview. Ultrasonics40, 859–865 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar