Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in critically ill patients

References

• National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report. Data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am. J. Infect. Control32(8), 470–485 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in combined medical–surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.21(8), 510–515 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montravers P, Gauzit R, Muller C et al. Emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in cases of peritonitis after intraabdominal surgery affects the efficacy of empirical antimicrobial therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis.23(3), 486–494 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont H, Mentec H, Sollet JP, Bleichner G. Impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med.27(2), 355–362 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti G, Bally F, Greub G et al. Cefepime versus imipenem–cilastatin for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, evaluator-blind, prospective, randomized study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(11), 3442–3447 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis.39(3), 309–317 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panceri ML, Vegni FE, Goglio A et al. Aetiology and prognosis of bacteraemia in Italy. Epidemiol. Infect.132(4), 647–654 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit. Care Med.34(2), 344–353 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar M, Mehta Y, Khurana P et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: incidence, risk factors, outcome, and microbiology. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.17(1), 22–28 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmon S, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. Hospital mortality for patients with bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chest125(2), 607–616 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sligl W, Taylor G, Brindley PG. Five years of nosocomial Gram-negative bacteria in a general intensive care unit: epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and outcomes. Int. J. Infect. Dis.10(4), 320–325 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obritsch MD, Fish DN, MacLaren R, Jung R. Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: epidemiology and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy25(10), 1353–1364 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda EA, Marinho IS, Boulos M et al. Nosocomial infections caused by multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.20(9), 620–623 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippe E, Weiss M, Shultz JM, Yeomans F, Ehrenkranz NJ. Emergence of highly antibiotic-resistance Pseudomonasaeruginosa in relation to duration of empirical antipseudomonal antibiotic treatment. Clin. Perform. Qual. Health Care7(2), 83–87 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tacconelli E, Tumbarello M, Bertagnolio S et al. Multidrug-resistant P seudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: analysis of trends in prevalence and epidemiology. Emerg. Infect. Dis.8(2), 220–221 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuong M, Arvaniti K, Ruimy R et al. Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and risk factors for carriage acquisition in an intensive care unit. J. Hosp. Infect.53(4), 274–282 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramythiotou E, Lucet JC, Timsit JF et al. Acquisition of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients in intensive care units: role of antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity. Clin. Infect. Dis.38(5), 670–677 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloush V, Navon-Venezia S, Seigman-Igra Y, Cabili S, Carmeli Y. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and clinical impact. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.50(1), 43–48 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CY, Jerng JS, Cheng KY et al. Pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalised patients: clinical features, risk-factors and outcomes. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.12(1), 63–68 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pier GB, Ramphal R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th Edition. Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R (Eds). Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, PA, USA,2587–2615 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg JB. Pseudomonas: global bacteria. Trends Microbiol.8(2), 55–57 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature406(6799), 959–964 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautmann M, Lepper PM, Haller M. Ecology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the intensive care unit and the evolving role of water outlets as a reservoir of the organism. Am. J. Infect. Control33(5), S41–S49 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli Y, Troillet N, Eliopoulos GM, Samore MH. Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43(6), 1379–1382 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo MP, Woodford N, Sinclair A et al. Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing VIM-8, a novel metallo-β-lactamase, in a tertiary care center in Cali, Colombia. J. Clin. Microbiol.42(11), 5094–5101 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira AC, Gobara S, Costa SE et al. Emergence of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species after the use of antimicrobials for burned patients. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.25(10), 868–872 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukayama DT, van Loon HJ, Cartwright C et al. The evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during antibiotic rotation in a medical intensive care unit: the RADAR-trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents24(4), 339–345 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore DM. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin. Infect. Dis.34(5), 634–640 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossolini GM, Mantengoli E. Treatment and control of severe infections caused by multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11(Suppl. 4), 17–32 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez CJ, Lolans K, Villegas MV, Quinn JP. Mechanisms of resistance to β-lactams in some common Gram-negative bacteria causing nosocomial infections. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther.3(6), 915–922 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomson JM, Bonomo RA. The threat of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria: β-lactams in peril! Curr. Opin. Microbiol.8(5), 518–524 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girlich D, Naas T, Nordmann P. Biochemical characterization of the naturally occurring oxacillinase OXA-50 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(6), 2043–2048 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong KF, Jayawardena SR, Indulkar SD et al.Pseudomonas aeruginosa AmpR is a global transcriptional factor that regulates expression of AmpC and PoxB β-lactamases, proteases, quorum sensing, and other virulence factors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(11), 4567–4575 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore DM. β-lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.8(4), 557–584 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush K, Jacoby GA, Medeiros AA. A functional classification scheme for β-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39(6), 1211–1233 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naas T, Nordmann P. OXA-type β-lactamases. Curr. Pharm. Des.5(11), 865–879 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford P. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology and detection of this important resistance treat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.14(4), 933–951 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroidi A, Tzelepi E, Tsakris A et al. An integron-associated β-lactamase (IBC-2) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a variant of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase IBC-1. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.48(5), 627–630 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldhagen GF, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Ambler class A extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel developments and clinical impact. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(8), 2385–2392 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush K. Metallo-β-lactamases: a class apart. Clin. Infect. Dis.27(Suppl. 1), S48–S53 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann P, Poirel L. Emerging carbapenemases in Gram-negative aerobes. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.8(6), 321–331 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docquier JD, Mugnaioli C, Luzzaro F et al. Diversity of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases in carbapenem resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp. from Italy. Proceedings of the 13th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Glasgow, UK. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.9(Suppl. 1), 121 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Docquier JD, Luzzaro F, Amicosante G, Toniolo A, Rossolini GM. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing PER-1 extended-spectrum serine-β-lactamase and VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7(5), 910–911 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh TR. The emergence and implications of metallo-β-lactamases in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11(Suppl. 6), 2–9 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Lee WG, Uh Y et al. VIM- and IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. in Korean hospitals. Emerg. Infect. Dis.9(7), 868–871 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi G, Luzzaro F, Docquier JD et al. Nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas putida producing VIM-1 metallo-β-lactamase. J. Clin. Microbiol.40(11), 4051–4055 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby GA, Munoz-Price LS. The new β-lactamases. N. Engl. J. Med.352(4), 380–391 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang CI, Kim SH, Park WB et al. Blood stream infections caused by antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli: factors for mortality and impact of inappropriate initial therapy on outcome. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(2), 760–766 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Metallo-β-lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin. Microbiol. Rev.18(2), 306–325 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole K. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(2), 479–487 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GH, Sabatelli FJ, Naples L et al. Resistance to aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas. Trends Microbiol.2(9), 347–353 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller GH, Sabatelli FJ, Hare RS et al. The most frequent aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms – changes with time and geographic area: a reflection of aminoglycoside usage patterns? Aminoglycoside Resistance Study Groups. Clin. Infect. Dis.24(Suppl. 1), S46–S62 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Baker EN. Aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance by enzymatic deactivation. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord.2(2), 143–160 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hancock RE, Brinkman FS. Function of Pseudomonas porins in uptake and efflux. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.56(1), 17–38 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter DJ, Hanson ND, Lister PD. Insertional inactivation of oprD in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa leading to carbapenem resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.236(1), 137–143 (2004)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole K. Multidrug efflux pumps and antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related organisms. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.3(2), 255–264 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole K, Krebes K, McNally C, Neshat S. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J. Bacteriol.175(22), 7363–7372 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole K, Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H et al. Overexpression of the mexC-mexD-oprJ effux operon in nfxB-type multidrug resistant strains. Mol. Microbiol.21(4), 713–724 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler T, Michea-Hamzehpour M, Henze U, Gotoh N, Curty LK, Pechere JC. Characterization of MexE-MexF-OprN, a positively regulated multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol.23(2), 345–354 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aendekerk S, Ghysels B, Cornelis P, Baysse C. Characterization of a new efflux pump, MexGHI-OpmD, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that confers resistance to vanadium. Microbiology148(Pt 8), 2371–2381 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuanchuen R, Narasaki CT, Schweizer HP. The MexJK efflux pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires OprM for antibiotic efflux but not for efflux of triclosan. J. Bacteriol.184(18), 5036–5044 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mine T, Morita Y, Kataoka A, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Expression in Escherichia coli of a new multidrug efflux pump, MexXY, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43(2), 415–417 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrock-Wadman S, Sherman DR, Hickey MJ et al. Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa efflux pump contributing to aminoglycoside resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43(12), 2975–2983 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer HP. Efflux as a mechanism of resistance to antimicrobials in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related bacteria: unanswered questions. Genet. Mol. Res.2(1), 48–62 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aeschlimann JR. The role of multidrug efflux pumps in the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacteria. Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy23(7), 916–924 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole K. Efflux-mediated multiresistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(1), 12–26 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llanes C, Hocquet D, Vogne C et al. Clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overproducing MexAB-OprM and MexXY efflux pumps simultaneously. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(5), 1797–1802 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler T, Michea-Hamzehpour M, Epp SF, Pechere JC. Carbapenem activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: respective contributions of OprD and efflux systems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43(2), 424–427 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler T, Pechere C. In vitro selection of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.7(Suppl. 5), 7–10 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akama H, Matsuura T, Kashiwagi S et al. Crystal structure of the membrane fusion protein, MexA, of the multidrug transporter in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem.279(25), 25939–25942 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins MK, Bokma E, Koronakis E, Hughes C, Koronakis V. Structure of the periplasmic component of a bacterial drug efflux pump. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(27), 9994–9999 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koronakis V, Sharff A, Koronakis E, Luisi B, Hughes C. Crystal structure of the bacterial membrane protein TolC central to multidrug efflux and protein export. Nature405(6789), 914–919 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami S, Nakashima R, Yamashita E, Yamaguchi A. Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature419(6907), 587–593 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Nakano M, Deguchi T, Kawamura T et al. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41(10), 2289–2291 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalal S, Wretlind B. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Microb. Drug Resist.4(4), 257–261 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akasaka T, Tanaka M, Yamaguchi A, Sato K. Type II topoisomerase mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in 1998 and 1999: role of target enzyme in mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45(8), 2263–2268 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon-Venezia S, Ben-Ami R, Carmeli Y. Update on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections in the healthcare setting. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.18(4), 306–313 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drenkard E. Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microbes Infect.5(13), 1213–1219 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamarellou H. Prescribing guidelines for severe Pseudomonas infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.49(2), 229–233 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiska DL, Gilligan PH. Pseudomonas. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology (8th Ed.). Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH (Eds), ASM Press, Washington DC, USA,719–728 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Gales AC, Reis AO, Jones RN. Contemporary assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control guidelines. J. Clin. Microbiol.39(1), 183–190 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzaro F, Endimiani A, Docquier JD et al. Prevalence and characterization of metallo-β-lactamases in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.48(2), 131–135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal F, Mensa J, Almela M et al. Epidemiology and outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, with special emphasis on the influence of antibiotic treatment: analysis of 189 episodes. Arch. Intern. Med.156(18), 2121–2126 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S et al. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest118(1), 146–155 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochud PY, Bonten M, Marchetti O, Calandra T. Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit. Care Med.32(11 Suppl.), S495–S512 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerding DN, Larson TA, Hughes RA et al. Aminoglycoside resistance and aminoglycoside usage: ten years of experience in one hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.35(7), 1284–1290 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollef MH, Vlasnik J, Sharpless L et al. Scheduled change of antibiotic classes: a strategy to decrease the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.156(4), 1040–1048 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez EA, Smith TL, Reed E et al. A pilot study of antibiotic cycling in a haematology–oncology unit. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.21(1 Suppl.), S4–S8 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruson D, Hilbert G, Vargas F et al. Rotation and restricted use of antibiotics in a medical intensive care unit: impact on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by antibiotic-resistant gram negative bacteria. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.162(3), 837–843 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Crabtree TD et al. Impact of a rotating empiric antibiotic schedule on infectious mortality in an intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med.29(6), 1101–1108 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin SK. Routine cycling of antimicrobial agents as an infection-control measure. Clin. Infect. Dis.36(11), 1438–1444 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson DL, Rice LB. Empirical antibiotic choice for the seriously ill patient: are minimization of selection of resistant organisms and maximization of individual outcome mutually exclusive? Clin. Infect. Dis.36(8), 1006–1012 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruson D, Hilbert G, Vargas F et al. Rotation and restricted use of antibiotics in a medical intensive care unit. Impact on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.162(3 Pt 1), 837–843 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez JA, Nicolas JM, Marco F et al. Comparison of antimicrobial cycling and mixing strategies in two medical intensive care units. Crit. Care Med.34(2), 329–336 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren DK, Hill HA, Merz MR. Cycling empirical antimicrobial agents to prevent emergence of antimicrobial resistant gram negative bacteria among intensive care unit patients. Crit. Care Med.32(12), 2450–2456 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess DS. Use of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to optimize antimicrobial treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.40(Suppl. 2), S99–S104 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess DS, Nathisuwan S. Cefepime, pipericillin/tazobactam, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.44(1), 35–41 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould IM, Milne K. In-vitro pharmacodynamic studies of piperacillin/tazobactam with gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.39(1), 53–61 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess DS, Hall RG, Hardin TC. In vitro evaluation of the activity of two doses of levofloxacin alone and in combination with other agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.46(2), 131–172 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister PD, Wolter DJ. Levofloxacin–imipenem combination prevents the emergence of resistance among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Infect. Dis.15(Suppl. 2), S105–S114 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Oie S, Uematsu T, Sawa A et al. In vitro effects of combinations of antipseudomonal agents against seven strains of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.52(6), 911–914 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sader HS, Jones RN. Comprehensive in vitro evaluation of cefepime combined with aztreonam or ampicillin/sulbactam against multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents25(5), 380–384 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Grecka P, Giamarellou H. In-vitro interactions of DX-8739, a new carbapenem, meropenem and imipenem with amikacin against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.38(2), 287–291 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermertcan S, Hosgor M, Tunger O, Cosar G. Investigation of synergism of meropenem and ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter strains isolated from intensive care unit infections. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.33(11), 818–821 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piccoli L, Guerrieri M, Felici A, Marchetti F. In vitro and in vivo synergy of levofloxacin or amikacin both in combination with ceftazidime against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Chemother.17(4), 355–360 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson BW, Ibrahim KH, Hovde LB, Fromm TL, Reed MD, Rotschafer JC. Synergistic activity of colistin and ceftazidime against multiantibioticresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(3), 905–909 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRyke CA, Lee SY, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Optimising dosing strategies of antibacterials utilising pharmacodynamic principles. impact on the development of resistance. Drugs66(1), 1–14 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser J, Stone BB, Groner MC, Zinner SH. Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.31(7), 1054–1060 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy MK, Nicolau DP, Nightingale CH, Quintiliani R. The pharmacodynamics of aminoglycosides. Clin. Infect. Dis.27(1), 23–27 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashuba AD, Nafziger AN, Drusano GL, Bertino JS. Optimizing aminoglycoside therapy for nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43(3), 623–629 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolau DP, Freeman CD, Belliveau PP, Nightingale CH, Ross JW, Quintiliani R. Experience with a once-daily aminoglycoside program administered to 2,184 adult patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39(3), 650–655 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murry KR, McKinnon PS, Mitrzyk B, Rybak MJ. Pharmacodynamic characterization of nephrotoxicity associated with once-daily aminoglycoside. Pharmacotherapy19(11), 1252–1260 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andes D, Craig WA. Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents19(4), 261–268 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGowan AP, Wootton M, Holt HA. The antibacterial efficacy of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa assessed by combining antibiotic exposure and bacterial susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.43(3), 345–349 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipro (ciprofloxacin) I.V. Bayer Pharmaceuticals, CT, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Levaquin tablets/injection. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, NJ, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gotfried MH, Danziger LH, Rodvold KA. Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in healthy adult subjects. Chest119(4), 1114–1122 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodvold KA, Danziger LH, Gotfried MH. Steady-state plasma and bronchopulmonary concentrations of intravenous levofloxacin and azithromycin in healthy adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(12), 2450–2472 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumbe N, Louie A, Leary R et al. Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy. J. Clin. Invest.112(2), 275–285 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin. Infect. Dis.26(1), 1–10 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drusano GL. Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of ‘bug and drug’. Nature Rev. Microbiol.2(4), 289–300 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drusano GL. Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents. Clin. Infect. Dis.36(Suppl. 1), S42–S50 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnidge JD. The pharmacodynamics of β-lactams. Clin. Infect. Dis.27(1), 10–22 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manduru M, Mihm LB, White RL, Friedrich LV, Flume PA, Bosso JA. In vitro pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41(9), 2053–2056 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam VH, McKinnon PS, Akins RL, Rybak MJ, Drusano GL. Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.50(3), 425–428 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiakou SK, Lawrence KR, Choulis N, Falagas ME. Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Drugs65(17), 2499–2511 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess DS, Hastings RW, Hardin TC. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by intermittent and continuous infusion. Clin. Ther.22(1), 66–75 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam VH, Louie A, Lomaestro BM, Drusano GL. Integration of population pharmacokinetics, a pharmacodynamic target, and microbiologic surveillance data to generate a rational empiric dosing strategy for cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pharmacotherapy23(3), 291–295 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges B, Conil JM, Cougot P et al. Cefepime in critically ill patients: continuous infusion vs. an intermittent dosing regiment. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.43(8), 360–369 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorente L, Lorenzo L, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML. Meropenem by continuous versus internittent infusion in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli. Ann. Pharmacother.40(2), 219–223 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiakou SK, Sermaides GJ, Michalopoulos A, Soteriades ES, Falagas ME. Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibiotics: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect. Dis.5(9), 581–589 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pea F, Viale P, Furlanut M. Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet.44(10), 1009–1034 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra R, De Gaudio R, Palazzo M. Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness. Intensive Care Med.30(12), 2145–2156 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pea F, Viale P. The antimicrobial therapy puzzle: could pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationships be helpful in addressing the issue of appropriate pneumonia treatment in critically ill patients? Clin. Infect. Dis.42(12), 1764–1771 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltch AL, Smith RP. Combinations of antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. J. Med.79(1A), 8–16 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th Edition. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (Eds). Churchill Livingstone, PA, USA,2310–2335 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim EH, Ward S, Sherman G et al. Experience with a clinical guideline for the treatment of ventilator associated pneumonia. Crit. Care Med.29(6), 1109–1115 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamarellou H, Zissis NP, Tagari G, Bouzos J. In vitro synergistic activities of aminoglycosides and new β-lactams against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.25(4), 534–536 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess DS, Hastings RW. Activity of piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by time–kill. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.38(1), 37–41 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilf M, Yu VL, Sharp J et al. Antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: outcome correlations in a prospective study of 200 patients. Am. J. Med.87(5), 540–546 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klastersky J. Science and pragmatism in the treatment and prevention of neutropenic infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.41(Suppl. D), 13–24 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovici L, Paul M, Poznanski O et al. Monotherapy versus β-lactam-aminoglycoside combination treatment for Gram-negative bacteremia: a prospective, observational study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41(4), 1127–1133 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traub WH, Spohr M, Bauer D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs, single and combined with and without defibrinated human blood. Chemotherapy34(4), 284–297 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes JM, Baitch AL, Smith RP, Hammer M, Ritz W. The effect of rifampicin on the in vitro activity of cefpirome or ceftazidime in combination with aminoglycosides against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.25(4), 575–584 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuravleff JJ, Yu VL, Yee RB. Ticarcillin–tobramycin–rifampin: in vitro synergy of the triple combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.J. Lab. Clin. Med.101(6), 896–902 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu KP, Lasinski E, Zoganas H, Kimble E, Konopka EA. Efficacy of rifampicin in experimental Bacteroides fragilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa mixed infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.15(5), 579–585 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes JM, Baitch AL, Smith RP et al. Comparative therapy with cefpirome alone and in combination with rifampin and/or gentamicin against disseminated Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in leukopenic mice. J. Infect. Dis.162(5), 1112–1117 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuravleff JJ, Chervenick P, Yu VL, Muder RR, Diven WF. Addition of rifampin to ticarcillin–tobramycin combination for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: assessment in a neutropenic mouse model. J. Lab. Clin. Med.103(6), 878–885 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu VL, Zuravleff JJ, Peacock JE, DeHertogh D, Tashjian L. Addition of rifampin to carboxypenicillin–aminoglycoside combination for treatment of infection: clinical experience with four patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.26(4), 575–577 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korvick JA, Peacock JE, Muder RR, Wheeler RR, Yu VL. Addition of rifampin to combination antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: prospective trial using the zelen protocol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.36(3), 620–625 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul M, Benuri-Silbiger I, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L. β lactam monotherapy versus β lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br. Med. J.328(7441), 668–672 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdar N, Handelsman J, Maki DG. Does combination antibiotic therapy reduce mortality in gram-negative bacteremia? A meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis.4(8), 519–527 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul M, Silbiger I, Grozinsky S et al. β lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus β lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD003344 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Wickman PA, Reisbig MD. Levofloxacin/imipenem prevents the emergence of high-level resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains already lacking susceptibility to one or both drugs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.57(5), 999–1103 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damas P, Garweg C, Monchi M et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapy: a randomised pilot study on the evolution of inflammatory parameters after ventilator associated pneumonia. Crit. Care10(2), R52 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RD, Lietman PS, Smith CR. Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration. J. Infect. Dis.155(1), 93–99 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert DN. Once daily aminoglycoside therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.35(3), 339–405 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman CD, Nicolau DP, Belliveau PP, Nightingale CH. Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides: review and recommendations for clinical practice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.39(6), 677–686 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Christrup LL, Jarlov JO et al. Gentamicin dosing in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.45(6), 734–740 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrby SR, Finch RG, Glauser M. Monotherapy in serious hospital-acquired infections: a clinical trial of ceftazidime versus imipenem/cilastatin. European Study Group. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.31(6), 927–937 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens RC Jr, Rice L. Hospital-based strategies for combating resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis.42(Suppl. 4), S173–S181 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao B, Wang H, Sun H, Zhu Y, Chen M. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of nosocomial multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J. Hosp. Infect.57(2), 112–118 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrby SR. Carbapenems in serious infections: a risk-benefit assessment. Drug Saf.22(3), 191–194 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiakou SK, Lawrence KR, Choulis N, Falagas ME. Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Drugs65(17), 2499–2511 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garau J, Gome L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.16(2), 135–143 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes WT, Armostrong D, Bodey GP et al. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis.34(6), 730–751 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo PA, Hathorn JW, Hiemenz J et al. A randomized trial comparing ceftazidime alone with combination antibiotic therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. N. Engl. J. Med.315(9), 552–558 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cometta A, Calandra T, Gaya H et al. Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.40(4), 1108–1115 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphal R, Gucalp R, Rotstein C, Cimino M, Oblon D. Clinical experience with single agent and combination regimens in the management of infection in the febrile neutropenic patient. Am. J. Med.100(6A), S83–S89 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hess U, Bohme C, Rey K, Senn HJ. Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients. Support. Care Cancer6(4), 402–409 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Favero A, Menichetti F, Martino P et al. Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) Infection Program. A multicenter, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial comparing piperacillin-tazobactam with and without amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia. Clin. Infect. Dis.33(8), 1295–1301 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furno P, Bucaneve G, Del Favero A. Monotherapy or aminoglycoside-containing combinations for empirical antibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenic patients: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis.2(4), 231–242 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscoli C, Castagnola E. Treatment of febrile neutropenia: what is new? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.15(4), 377–382 (2002)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo PA, Robichaud KJ, Gill FA et al. Duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. Am. J. Med.67(2), 194–200 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panidis D, Markantonis SL, Boutzouka E, Karatzas S, Baltopoulos G. Penetration of gentamicin into the alveolar lining fluid of critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest128(2), 545–552 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.171(4), 388–416 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West M, Boulanger BR, Fogarty C et al. Levofloxacin compared with imipenem/cilastatin followed by ciprofloxacin in adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study. Clin. Ther.25(2), 485–506 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viale P, Pea F. What is the role of fluoroquinolones in intensive care? J. Chemother.15(Suppl. 3), 5–10 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheld WM. Maintaining fluoroquinolone class efficacy: review of influencing factors. Emerg. Infect. Dis.9(1), 1–9 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhauser MM, Weinstein RA, Rydman R et al. Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacilli in US intensive care units: implications for fluoroquinolone use. JAMA289(7), 885–888 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk RE, Johnson CK, McClish D, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Predicting hospital rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from fluoroquinolone use in US hospitals and their surrounding communities. Clin. Infect. Dis.39(4), 497–503 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu DI, Okamoto MP, Murthy R, Wong-Beringer A. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors for acquisition and impact on outcomes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.55(4), 535–541 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doring G, Conway SP, Heijerman HG et al. Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a European consensus. Eur. Respir. J.16(4), 749–767 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratjen F. Changes in strategies for optimal antibacterial therapy in cystic fibrosis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents17(2), 93–96 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoiby N. New antimicrobials in the management of cystic fibrosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.49(2), 235–238 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canton R, Cobos N, de Gracia J et al. Antimicrobial therapy for pulmonary pathogenic colonization and infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11(9), 690–703 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood DM, Smyth AR. Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis (review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD004197 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Saiman L, Marshall BC, Mayer-Hamblett N et al. Azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA290(13), 1749–1756 (2003)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagata T, Mukae H, Kadota J et al. Effect of erythromycin on chronic respiratory infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with biofilm formation in an experimental murine model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(6), 2251–2259 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateda K, Comte R, Pechere JC et al. Azithromycin inhibits quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45(6), 1930–1933 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura Y, Yanagihara K, Mizuta Y et al. Azithromycin inhibits MUC5AC production induced by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa autoinducer N-(3-oxododecanoyl) homoserine lactone in NCI-H292 cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(9), 3457–3461 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiman L, Chen Y, Gabriel PS, Knirsch C. Synergistic activities of macrolide antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Alcaligenes xylosoxidans isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46(4), 1105–1107 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise BL, Mathis JL, Jawetz E. Infections of the central nervous system due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Neurosurg.31(4), 432–434 (1969).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahal JJ, Simberkoff MS. Host defense and antimicrobial therapy in gram-negative bacillary meningitis. Ann. Intern. Med.96(4), 468–474 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong IW, Tomkins KB. Review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis with special emphasis on treatment with ceftazidime. Rev. Infect. Dis.7(5), 604–612 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez WJ, Khan WN, Cocchetto DM et al. Treatment of Pseudomonas meningitis with ceftazidime with or without concurrent therapy. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.9(2), 83–87 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marone P, Concia E, Maserati R et al. Ceftazidime in the therapy of Pseudomonas meningitis. Chemioterapia4(4), 289–292 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saez-Llorens X, Castano E, Garcia R et al. Prospective randomized comparison of cefepime and cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39(4), 937–940 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saez-Llorens X, O’Ryan M. Cefepime in the empiric treatment of meningitis in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.20(3), 356–361 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau JM, Soullie B, Villevielle T, Koeck JL. Efficacy of cefepime in postoperative meningitis attributable to Enterobacter aerogenes. J. Trauma50(5), 971 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnelly JP, Horrevorts AM, Sauerwein RW, De Pauw BE. High-dose meropenem in meningitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Letter). Lancet339(8801), 1117 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitano B, Nicolau DP, Potoski BA et al. Meropenem administered as a prolonged infusion to treat serious gram-negative central nervous system infections. Pharmacotherapy24(6), 803–807 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Eng RHK, Lynch AM, Smith SM et al. Imipenem resistance in a case of AIDS with relapsing Pseudomonas meningitis. South. Med.83, 979–980 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Schmutzhard E, Williams KJ, Vukmirovits G et al. A randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in adults. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.36(Suppl. A), 85–97 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odio CM, Puig JR, Feris JM et al. Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study of the efficacy and safety of meropenem vs. cefotaxime therapy in bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.18(7), 581–590 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL et al. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin. Infect. Dis.39(9), 1267–1284 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmelik V, Gutvirth J. Meropenem treatment of post-traumatic meningitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.32(6), 922–923 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonwald S, Beus I, Lisic M, Car V, Gmajinicki B. Ciprofloxacin in the treatment of Gram-negative bacillary meningitis. Am. J. Med.87(5A), 248S–249S (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Wong-Beringer A, Beringer P, Lovett MA. Successful treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis with highdose ciprofloxacin. Clin. Infect. Dis.25(4), 936–937 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krcmery V Jr, Filka J, Uher J et al. Ciprofloxacin in the treatment of nosocomial meningitis in neonates and in infants: report of 12 cases and review. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.35(1), 75–80 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman J, Allworth A, Wallis SC. Cerebrospinal penetration of high doses of intravenous ciprofloxacin in meningitis. Clin. Infect. Dis.31(5), 1131–1132 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha V, Stansfield R, Masterton R, Eden T. The treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis: old regime or newer drugs? Scand. J. Infect. Dis.25(1), 81–83 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright PF, Kaiser AB, Bowman CM, McKee KT Jr, Trujillo H, McGee ZA. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of an aminoglycoside administered into the cerebral ventricles in neonates: implications for further evaluation of this route of therapy in meningitis. J. Infect. Dis.143(2), 141–147 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz MN. Intraventricular use of aminoglycosides in the treatment of Gram-negative bacillary meningitis: conflicting views. J. Infect. Dis.143(2), 293–296 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corpus KA, Weber KB, Zimmerman CR. Intrathecal amikacin for the treatment of Pseudomonal meningitis. Ann. Pharmacother.38(6), 992–995 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentnek AL, Williams RR. Aztreonam in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial meningitis. Rev. Infect. Dis.13(Suppl. 7), S586–S590 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick M, Girgis N, Farid Z, Bishay E. Aztreonam for treating meningitis caused by gram-negative rods. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.23(1), 125–126 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gump WC, Walsh JW. Intrathecal colistin for treatment of highly resistant Pseudomonas ventriculitis. Case report and review of the literature. J. Neurosurg.102(5), 915–917 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radetsky M. Duration of treatment in bacterial meningitis: a historical inquiry. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.9(1), 2–9 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill P. How long to treat bacterial meningitis. Lancet341(8844), 530 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunkel AR, Kaufman BA. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th Edition. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (Eds). Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, PA, USA,1126–1132 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman BA. Infections of cerebrospinal fluid shunts. In: Infections of the Central Nervous System. 2nd Edition. Scheld WM, Whitley RJ, Durack DT (Eds). Lippincott-Raven, PA, USA,555–577 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Infection in Neurosurgery Working Party of the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. The rational use of antibiotics in the treatment of brain abscess. Br. J. Neurosurg.14(6), 525–530 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza MW, Shad A, Pedler SJ, Karamat KA. Penetration and activity of antibiotics in brain abscess. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak.15(3), 165–167 (2005)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shekar R, Rice TW, Zierdt CH, Kallick CA. Outbreak of endocarditis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O11 among pentazocine and tripelennamine abusers in Chicago. J. Infect. Dis.151(2), 203–208 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajashekaraiah KR, Rice TW, Kallick CA. Recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from syringes of drug addicts with endocarditis. J. Infect. Dis.144(5), 482 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu RB, Chen RJ, Chu SH. Infective endocarditis in patients with liver cirrhosis. J. Formos Med. Assoc.103(5), 355–358 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan A, Spalding C, Speedie A, Sinha G, Rumbaugh JA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infective endocarditis presenting as bacterial meningitis. J. Infect.51(4), 199–202 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill EE, Herijgers P, Herregods MC, Peetermans WE. Evolving trends in infective endocarditis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.12(1), 5–12 (2006)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreillon P, Que YA. Infective endocarditis. Lancet363(9403), 139–149 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin PJ, Suseno MT, Cook FV, Peterson LR, Thomson RB Jr. Left-sided endocarditis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: successful treatment with meropenem and tobramycin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.47(2), 427–430 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun Ö, Akalin HE, Ünal S et al. Long-term oral ciprofloxacin in treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.24(6), 797–800 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstkotte D, Follath F, Gutschik E et al. Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis – executive summary. Eur. Heart J.25(3), 267–276 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaison L, Pettersson G. Current best practices and guidelines indications for surgical intervention in infective endocarditis. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am.16(2), 453–475 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) Report, data summary from October 1986 to April 1996, issued May 1996. A report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Am. J. Infect. Control24(5), 380–388 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouza E, San Juan R, Munoz P, Voss A, Kluytmans J on behalf of the Co-operative Group of the European Study Group on Nosocomial Infections (ESGNI). A European perspective on nosocomial urinary tract infections I. Report on the microbiology workload, etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility (ESGNI-003 study). European Study Group on Nosocomial Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.7(10), 523–531 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laupland K, Bagshaw S, Gregson D, Kirkpatrick AW, Ross T, Church DL. Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system. Crit. Care9(2), R60–R65 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Gaynes R, Edwards JR. Overview of nosocomial infections caused by gram negative bacilli. Clin. Infect. Dis.41(6), 848–854 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang G, Brennen C, Wagener M et al. Use of ciprofloxacin versus use of aminoglycosides for therapy of complicated urinary tract infection: prospective, randomized clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.35(9), 1849–1855 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomerie JZ, Guerra DA, Schick DG, Gilmore DS, Tabatabai MF, Morrow JW. Pseudomonas urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J. Am. Paraplegia Soc.12(1), 8–10 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leigh DA, Emmanuel FXS, Petch VJ. Ciprofloxacin therapy in complicated urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other resistant bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.18(Suppl. D), 117–121 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown EM, Morris R, Stephenson TP. The efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.18(Suppl. D), 123–127 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinverni R, Glauser MP. Comparative studies of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of urinary tract infections. Rev. Infect. Dis.10(Suppl. 1), S153–S163 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Pea F, Viale P, Damiani D et al. Ceftazidime in acute myeloid leukemia patients with febbrile neutropenia: helpfulness of continuous intravenous infusion in maximizing pharmacodynamic exposure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemiother.49(8), 3550–3553 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baririan N, Chanteux H, Viaene E, Servais H, Tulkens PM. Stability and compatibility study of cefepime in comparison with ceftazidime for potential administration by continuous infusion under conditions pertinent to ambulatory treatment of cystic fibrosis patients and to administration in intensive care units. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51, 651–658 (2003)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans ME, Feola DJ, Rapp RP. Polymyxin B sulfate and colistin: old antibiotics for emerging multiresistant gram-negative bacteria. Ann. Pharmacother.33(9), 960–967 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• al Khayyat AA, Aronson AL. Pharmacologic and toxicologic studies with the polymyxins. 3. Consideration regarding clinical use in dogs. Chemotherapy19(2), 98–108 (1973).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolinsky E, Hines JD. Neurotoxic and nephrotoxic effects of colistin in patients with renal disease. N. Engl. J. Med.266, 759–762 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Koch-Weser J, Sidel VW, Federman EB. Adverse effects of sodium colisimethate: manifestations and specific rates during 317 courses of therapy. Ann. Intern. Med.72(6), 857–868 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin AS, Barone AA, Penco J et al. Intravenous colistin as therapy for nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin. Infect. Dis.28(5), 1008–1111 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein A, Raoult D. Colistin: an antimicrobial for the 21st century? Clin. Infect. Dis.35(7), 901–902 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieszczyk ME, Furuya EY, Hay CM et al. Combination therapy with polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative respiratory tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.54(2), 566–569 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasiakou S, Michalopoulos A, Soteriades ES, Samonis G, Sermaides GJ, Falagas ME. Combination therapy with intravenous colistin for management of infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in patients without cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(8), 3136–3146 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden PK, Kusne S, Coley K et al. Use of parenteral colistin for the treatment of serious infection due to antimicrobial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Infect. Dis.37(11), 154–160 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tascini C, Gemignani G, Ferranti S et al. Microbiological activity and clinical efficacy of a colistin and rifampin combination in multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J. Chemother.16(3), 282–287 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.40(9), 1333–1341 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies. Crit. Care10(1), R27 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Glupczynski Y, Tulkens PM. Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43(4), 727–737 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali BH. Agents ameliorating or augmenting experimental gentamicin nephrotoxicity: some recent research. Food Chem. Toxicol.41(11), 1447–1452 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheer SM, Waugh J, Noble S. Inhaled tobramycin (TOBI): a review of its use in the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Drugs63(22), 2501–2520 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flume P, Klepser ME. The rationale for aerosolized antibiotics. Pharmacotherapy22(3 Pt 2), S71–S79 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffelers RM, Storm G, ten Kate MT et al. In vivo synergistic interaction of liposome-coencapsulated gentamicin and ceftazidime. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.298(1), 369–375 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejman J, Wagenaar A, Engberts JB, Hoekstra D. Characterization and transfection properties of lipoplexes stabilized with novel exchangeable polyethylene glycol–lipid conjugates. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1660(1–2), 41–52 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffelers R, Storm G, Bakker-Woudenberg I. Liposome-encapsulated aminoglycosides in pre-clinical and clinical studies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.48(3), 333–344 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachetelli S, Khalil H, Chen T, Beaulac C, Senechal S, Lagace J. Demonstration of a fusion mechanism between a fluid bactericidal liposomal formulation and bacterial cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1463(2), 254–266 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro C, Wiseman DJ, Lutwyche P et al. Antibacterial efficacy of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes against an in vivo Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium intracellular infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44(3), 533–539 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutwyche P, Cordeiro C, Wiseman DJ et al. Intracellular delivery and antibacterial activity of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42(10), 2511–2520 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacucchio MC, Gatto Bellora MJ, Sordelli DO, D’Aquino M. Enhanced liposome-mediated antibacterial activity of piperacillin and gentamicin against Gram-negative bacilli in vitro. J. Microencapsul.5(4), 303–309 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierer J, Hatlen L, Lin JP, Estrella D, Mihalko P, Yau-Young A. Successful treatment using gentamicin liposomes of Salmonella dublin infections in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.34(2), 343–348 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugabe C, Azghani AO, Omri A. Liposome-mediated gentamicin delivery: development and activity against resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.55(2), 269–271 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukholm G, Mugabe C, Azghani AO, Omri A. Antibacterial activity of liposomal gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a time-kill study. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents27(3), 247–252 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebeisen P, Heinze-Krauss I, Angehrn P, Hohl P, Page MG, Then RL. In vitro and in vivo properties of Ro 63–9141, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45(3), 825–836 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa NC, Rouse MS, Piper KE, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. In vitro activity of BAL9141 against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.48(1), 73–75 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kresken M, Heep M, Hafner D. In vitro activities of ceftobiprole, BAL9141, the activity component of BAL5788, and seven other β-lactams against selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptible or resistant to ceftazidime. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC). Washington DC, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kresken M, Heep M. In vitro activity of ceftobiprole in combination with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and tobramycin against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC). Washington DC, USA, E-311 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hatano K, Wakai Y, Nakai T et al. In vivo anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa activity of novel parenteral cephalosporin, FR264205. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC). Washington DC, USA, F-1165 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hatano K, Takeda S, Nakai T et al. In vitro anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa activity of novel parenteral cephalosporin, FR264205. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC). Washington DC, USA, F-1452 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Buynak JD. The discovery and development of modified penicillin- and cephalosporin-derived β-lactamase inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem.11(14), 1951–1964 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss WJ, Petersen PJ, Murphy TM et al. In vitro and in vivo activities of novel 6-methylidene penems as β-lactamase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(12), 4589–4596 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson CE, Lambert PA, Simpson IN. In vitro activities of novel oxapenems, alone and in combination with ceftazidime, against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(8), 2615–2618 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wróblewska M. Novel therapies of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. infections: the state of the art. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp.54(2), 113–120 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iso Y, Irie T, Iwaki T et al. Synthesis and modification of a novel 1 β-methyl carbapenem antibiotic, S-4661. J. Antibiot.49(5), 478–484 (1996)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iso Y, Irie T, Nishino Y, Motokawa K, Nishitani Y. A novel 1 β-methylcarbapenem antibiotic, S-4661. Synthesis and structure–activity relationships of 2-(5-substituted pyrroldin-3-ylthio)-1 β-methylcarbapenems. J. Antibiot.49(2), 199–209 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori M, Hikida M, Nishihara T, Nasu T, Mitsuhashi S. Comparative stability of carbapenem and penem antibiotics to human recombinant dehydropeptidase-I. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.37(5), 1034–1036 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji M, Ishii Y, Ohno A, Miyazaki S, Yamaguchi K. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of S-4661, a new carbapenem. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42(1), 184–187 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Y, Wikler MA, Sahm DF, Blosser-Middleton RS, Karlowsky JA. In vitro antimicrobial activity of doripenem, a new carbapenem. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(4), 1384–1396 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RN, Huynh HK, Biedenbach DJ. Activities of doripenem (S-4661) against drug-resistant clinical pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(8), 3136–3140 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RN, Huynh HK, Biedenbach DJ, Fritsche TR, Sader HS. Doripenem (S-4661), a novel carbapenem: comparative activity against contemporary pathogens including bactericidal action and preliminary in vitro methods evaluations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.54(1), 144–154 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe A, Takahashi H, Kikuchi T et al. Comparativein vitro activity of S-4661, a new parenteral carbapenem, and other antimicrobial agents against respiratory pathogens. Chemotherapy46(3), 184–187 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman LR, Wagstaff AJ, Brogden RN, Bryson HM. Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy. Drugs50(1), 73–101 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsche TR, Stilwell MG, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of doripenem (S-4661): a global surveillance report (2003). Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11(12), 974–984 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traczewski MM, Brown SD. In vitro activity of doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia isolates from both cystic fibrosis and noncystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.50(2), 819–821 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mushtaq S, Ge Y, Livermore DM. Doripenem versus Pseudomonas aeruginosain vitro: activity against characterized isolates, mutants, and transconjugants and resistant selection potential. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(8), 3086–3092 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Adamis T, Laoutaris G et al. Immunomodulatory clarithromycin treatment of experimental sepsis and acute pyelonephritis caused by multidrugresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(1), 93–99 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi T, Hagiwara K, Honda Y et al. Clarithromycin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-8 production by human monocytes through AP-1 and NF-κB transcription factors. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.49(5), 745–755 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Antonopoulou A, Raftogiannis M et al. Clarithromycin is an effective immunomodulator when administered late in experimental pyelonephritis by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Infect. Dis.6, 31 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renau TE, Leger R, Flamme EM et al. Inhibitors of efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa potentiate the activity of the fluoroquinolone antibacterial levofloxacin. J. Med. Chem.42(24), 4928–4931 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomovskaya O, Warren MS, Lee A et al. Identification and characterization of inhibitors of multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel agents for combination therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45(1), 105–116 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coban AY, Ekinci B, Durupinar B. A multidrug efflux pump inhibitor reduces fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Chemotherapy50(1), 22–26 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagès JM, Masi M, Barbe J. Inhibitors of efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Mol. Med.11(8), 382–389 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomovskaya O, Bostian KA. Practical applications and feasibility of efflux pump inhibitors in the clinic-A vision for applied use. Biochem. Pharmacol.71(7), 910–918 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch AS. Efflux systems in bacterial pathogens: an opportunity for therapeutic intervention? An industry view. Biochem. Pharmacol.71(7), 949–956 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen TB, Givskov M. Quorum-sensing inhibitors as anti-pathogenic drugs. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.296(2–3), 149–161 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givskov M, de Nys R, Manefield M et al. Eukaryotic interference with homoserine lactone mediated prokaryotic signaling. J. Bacteriol.178(22), 6618–6622 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manefield M, de Nys R, Kumar N et al. Evidence that halogenated furanones from Delisea pulchra inhibit acylated homoserine lactone (AHL)-mediated gene expression by displacing the AHL signal from its receptor protein. Microbiology145(Pt 2), 283–291 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen TB, Manefield M, Andersen JB et al. How Delisea pulchra furanones affect quorum sensing and swarming motility in Serratia liquefaciens MG1. Microbiology146(Pt 12), 3237–3244 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen TB, Bjarnsholt T, Skindersoe ME et al. Screening for quorum-sensing inhibitors (QSI) by use of a novel genetic system, the QSI selector. J. Bacteriol.187(5), 1799–1814 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen TB, Skindersoe ME, Bjarnsholt T et al. Identity and effects of quorum-sensing inhibitors produced by Penicillium species. Microbiology151(Pt 5), 1325–1340 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentzer M, Wu H, Andersen JB et al. Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors. EMBO J.22(15), 3803–3815 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, Sande MA. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2005. 35th Edition. Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc., VT, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar