4,313
Views
93
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Optimizing sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

, &
Pages 327-331 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • WHO. Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing. WHO Report. WHO/HTM/TB/2007.376. Geneva, Switzerland 1–270 (2007).
  • Dye C, Watt CJ, Bleed DM, Hosseini SM, Raviglione MC. Evolution of tuberculosis control and prospects for reducing tuberculosis incidence, prevalence, and deaths globally. JAMA293(22), 2767–2775 (2005).
  • Luelmo F. What is the role of sputum microscopy in patients attending health facilities? In: Toman’s Tuberculosis: Case Detection, Treatment, and Monitoring – Questions and Answers. Frieden TR (Ed.). WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 7–10 (2004).
  • Van Deun A. What is the role of mycobacterial culture in diagnosis and case definition? In: Toman’s Tuberculosis: Case Detection, Treatment, and Monitoring – Questions and Answers. Frieden TR (Ed.). WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 35–43 (2004).
  • Perkins MD. New diagnostic tools for tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.4(12 Suppl. 2), S182–S188 (2000).
  • Shaw JB, Wynn-Williams N. Infectivity of pulmonary tuberculosis in relation to sputum status. Am. Rev. Tuberc.69(5), 724–732 (1954).
  • Behr MA, Warren SA, Salamon H et al. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients’ smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli. Lancet353(9151), 444–449 (1999).
  • Grzybowski S, Barnett GD, Styblo K. Contacts of cases of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull. Int. Union Tuberc.50(1), 90–106 (1975).
  • Urbanczik R. Present position of microscopy and of culture in diagnostic mycobacteriology. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hyg. A260(1), 81–87 (1985).
  • Steingart KR, Ng V, Henry M et al. Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis.6(10), 664–674 (2006).
  • Perkins MD, Roscigno G, Zumla A. Progress towards improved tuberculosis diagnostics for developing countries. Lancet367(9514), 942–943 (2006).
  • Shingadia D, Novelli V. Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in children. Lancet Infect. Dis.3(10), 624–632 (2003).
  • Squire SB, Belaye AK, Kashoti A et al. ‘Lost’ smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases: where are they and why did we lose them? Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.9(1), 25–31 (2005).
  • Keeler E, Perkins MD, Small P et al. Reducing the global burden of tuberculosis: the contribution of improved diagnostics. Nature444(Suppl. 1), 49–57 (2006).
  • Pai M, Kalantri S, Dheda K. New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: part I. Latent tuberculosis. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.6(3), 413–422 (2006).
  • Pai M, Kalantri S, Dheda K. New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: part II. Active tuberculosis and drug resistance. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.6(3), 423–432 (2006).
  • Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis.6(9), 570–581 (2006).
  • Mase SR, Ramsay A, Ng V et al. Yield of serial sputum specimen examinations in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.11(5), 485–495 (2007).
  • Bruchfeld J, Aderaye G, Palme IB, Bjorvatn B, Kallenius G, Lindquist L. Sputum concentration improves diagnosis of tuberculosis in a setting with a high prevalence of HIV. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.94(6), 677–680 (2000).
  • Angeby KA, Hoffner SE, Diwan VK. Should the ‘bleach microscopy method’ be recommended for improved case detection of tuberculosis? Literature review and key person analysis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.8(7), 806–815 (2004).
  • Kivihya-Ndugga LEA, Van Cleeff MRA, Githui WA et al. A comprehensive comparison of Ziehl–Neelsen and fluorescence microscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in a resource-poor urban setting. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.7(12), 1163–1171 (2003).
  • Prasanthi K, Kumari AR. Efficacy of fluorochrome stain in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis co-infected with HIV. Indian J. Med. Microbiol.23(3), 179–181 (2005).
  • Bennedsen J, Larsen SO. Examination for tubercle bacilli by fluorescence microscopy. Scand. J. Respir. Dis.47(2), 114–120 (1966).
  • Nguyen VH, Dinh NS, Anthony RM, Cobelens FG, van Soolingen D. Fluorescence microscopy for tuberculosis diagnosis. Lancet Infect. Dis.7(4), 238–239; author reply 239–240 (2007).
  • Steingart KR, Ramsay A, Pai M. Fluorescence microscopy for tuberculosis diagnosis. Authors’ reply. Lancet Infect. Dis.7(4), 239–240 (2007).

Website

  • The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases www.stoptb.org/wg/new_diagnostics/ assets/documents/tdr-rfa-smearmicro opt-final.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.