Protein microarrays as a discovery tool for studying protein–protein interactions

References

• Pawson T, Saxton TM. Signaling networks – do all roads lead to the same genes? Cell97, 675–678 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson T. Specificity in signal transduction: from phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interactions to complex cellular systems. Cell116, 191–203 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenarios I, Salwinski L, Duan XQJ et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res.30, 303–305 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson T, Nash P. Protein–protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. Genes Dev.14, 1027–1047 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordborg M, Tavare S. Linkage disequilibrium: what history has to tell us. Trends Genet.18, 83–90 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emahazion T, Feuk L, Jobs M et al. SNP association studies in Alzheimer’s disease highlight problems for complex disease analysis. Trends Genet.17, 407–413 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science304, 1497–1500 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyers M, Mann M. From genomics to proteomics. Nature422, 193–197 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature422, 198–207 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem.250, 4007–4021 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik26, 231–243 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klose J, Kobalz U. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins: an updated protocol and implications for a functional analysis of the genome. Electrophoresis16, 1034–1059 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose J. Genotypes and phenotypes. Electrophoresis20, 643–652 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnol.17, 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 4569–4574 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature403, 623–627 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rain JC, Selig L, de Reuse H et al. The protein–protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature409, 211–215 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science302, 1727–1736 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SM, Armstrong CM, Bertin N et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C-elegans. Science303, 540–543 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature415, 141–147 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature415, 180–183 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins R, Edwards P. On the meaning of ‘sensitivity’. Clin. Chem.43, 1824–1831 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templin MF, Stoll D, Schwenk JM et al. Protein microarrays: promising tools for proteomic research. Proteomics3, 2155–2166 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel V, Sohnlein P, Jager C, Schade C, Steinert K. LiquiChip bead-based arrays: a flexible and efficient alternative to planar protein arrays. Shock21, 2–2 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Stillman BA, Parker BO, Tonkinson J, Harvey MA. Applying multiplexed microspot immunoassays. Genet. Eng. News24, 38 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Huang RP, Huang RC, Fan Y, Lin Y. Simultaneous detection of multiple cytokines from conditioned media and patient’s sera by an antibody-based protein array system. Anal. Biochem.294, 55–62 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetchko M, Studer I, Hort J, Stagljar I. Elucidation of the interaction network between yeast DNA processing proteins using endogenously tagged ORFs and the LiquiChip technology. Yeast20, S285–S285 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Wulfkuhle JD, Aquino JA, Calvert VS et al. Signal pathway profiling of ovarian cancer from human tissue specimens using reverse-phase protein microarrays. Proteomics3, 2085–2090 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paweletz CP, Charboneau L, Bichsel VE et al. Reverse phase protein microarrays which capture disease progression show activation of pro-survival pathways at the cancer invasion front. Oncogene20, 1981–1989 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb RL, Calvert VS, Wulkuhle JD et al. Signal pathway profiling of prostate cancer using reverse phase protein arrays. Proteomics3, 2142–2146 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodadek T. Development of protein-detecting microarrays and related devices. Trends Biochem. Sci.27, 295–300 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueking A, Possling A, Huber O et al. A nonredundant human protein chip for antibody screening and serum profiling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics2, 1342–1349 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusnezow W, Jacob A, Walijew A, Diehl F, Hoheisel JD. Antibody microarrays: an evaluation of production parameters. Proteomics3, 254–264 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angenendt P, Glokler J, Murphy D, Lehrach H, Cahill DJ. Toward optimized antibody microarrays: a comparison of current microarray support materials. Anal. Biochem.309, 253–260 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge H. UPA, a universal protein array system for quantitative detection of protein–protein, protein–DNA, protein–RNA and protein–ligand interactions. Nucleic Acids Res.28, E3 (I–VII) (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Graaf K, Hekerman P, Spelten O et al. Characterization of cyclin L2, a novel cyclin with an arginine/serine-rich domain: phosphorylation by DYRK1A and colocalization with splicing factors. J. Biol. Chem.279(6), 4612–4624 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science293, 2101–2105 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korf U, Kohl T, van der Zandt H et al. Large scale protein expression for proteome research. Proteomics (2005) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Braun P, Hu YH, Shen BH et al. Proteome-scale purification of human proteins from bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 2654–2659 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarstrom M, Hellgren N, van den Berg S, Berglund H, Hard T. Rapid screening for improved solubility of small human proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci.11, 313–321 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemann S, Weil B, Wellenreuther R et al. Toward a catalog of human genes and proteins: sequencing and analysis of 500 novel complete protein coding human cDNAs. Genome Res.11, 422–435 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strausberg RL, Feingold EA, Grouse LH et al. Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 16899–16903 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua J. Protometrix readies whole-proteome array. Scientist17, 42–42 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• LaBaer J. Harnessing the proteome. Biopolymers71, 282–282 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Martinsky T. Protein microarray manufacturing. PharmaGenomics42 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Boutell JM, Hart DJ, Godber BLJ, Kozlowski RZ, Blackburn JM. Functional protein microarrays for parallel characterisation of p53 mutants. Proteomics4, 1950–1958 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran N, Hainsworth E, Bhullar B et al. Self-assembling protein microarrays. Science305, 86–90 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heetebrij RJ. Universal linkage system (ULS): a versatile target labeling tool in genomics and proteomics. Clin. Chem.48, 2091–2091 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Liotta LA, Espina V, Mehta AI et al. Protein microarrays: meeting analytical challenges for clinical applications. Cancer Cell3, 317–325 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Frutos AG, Lahiri J. G-protein-coupled receptor microarrays. Chembiochem.3, 987–991 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman MA, Miller KA, Beernink PT, Yoshikawa DM, Albala JS. Identification of chromatin-related protein interactions using protein microarrays. Proteomics3, 2101–2107 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Newman JRS, Keating AE. Comprehensive identification of human bZIP interactions with coiled-coil arrays. Science300, 2097–2101 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espejo A, Cote J, Bednarek A, Richard S, Bedford MT. A protein-domain microarray identifies novel protein–protein interactions. Biochem. J.367, 697–702 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lesaicherre ML, Uttamchandani M, Chen GYJ, Yao SQ. Antibody-based fluorescence detection of kinase activity on a peptide array. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.12, 2085–2088 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Houseman BT, Huh JH, Kron SJ, Mrksich M. Peptide chips for the quantitative evaluation of protein kinase activity. Nature Biotechnol.20, 270–274 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Klemic JF, Chang S et al. Analysis of yeast protein kinases using protein chips. Nature Genet.26, 283–289 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBeath G, Schreiber SL. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science289, 1760–1763 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YJ, Wu TR, Cai SY, Welte T, Chin YE. Stat1 as a component of tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 1-TRADD signaling complex to inhibit NF-kappa B activation. Mol. Cell. Biol.20, 4505–4512 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar