Complex proteome prefractionation using microscale solution isoelectrofocusing

References

• Gorg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 4(12), 3665–3685 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G et al. The current state of 2D electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21(6), 1037–1053 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luche S, Santoni V, Rabilloud T. Evaluation of nonionic and zwitterionic detergents as membrane protein solubilizers in two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 3(3), 249–253 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tastet C, Charmont S, Chevallet M, Luche S, Rabilloud T. Structure–efficiency relationships of zwitterionic detergents as protein solubilizers in two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 3(2), 111–121 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White IR, Pickford R, Wood J, Skehel JM, Gangadharan B, Cutler P. A statistical comparison of silver and SYPRO Ruby staining for proteomic analysis. Electrophoresis 25(17), 3048–3054 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamanda A, Zahn A, Roder D, Langen H. Improved Ruthenium II tris (bathophenantroline disulfonate) staining and destaining protocol for a better signal-to-background ratio and improved baseline resolution. Proteomics 4(3), 599–608 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unlu M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 18(11), 2071–2077 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature Biotechnol. 19(3), 242–247 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JC, Senko MW, Syka JE. A two-dimensional quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13(6), 659–669 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadygov RG, Eng J, Durr E et al. Code developments to improve the efficiency of automated MS/MS spectra interpretation. J. Proteome Res. 1(3), 211–215 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bern M, Goldberg D, McDonald WH, Yates JR III. Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20(Suppl. 1), I49–I54 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RE, Young MK, Lee TD. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13(4), 378–386 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75(17), 4646–4658 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR III. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1(1), 21–26 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Li F, Wang J, Zheng D, Gao Y. AMASS: software for automatically validating the quality of MS/MS spectrum from SEQUEST results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3(12), 1194–1199 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eddes JS, Kapp EA, Frecklington DF et al. CHOMPER: a bioinformatic tool for rapid validation of tandem mass spectrometry search results associated with high-throughput proteomic strategies. Proteomics 2(9), 1097–1103 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1(5), 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Griffin TJ, Eng J, Aebersold R. Proteome analysis of low-abundance proteins using multidimensional chromatography and isotope-coded affinity tags. J. Proteome Res. 1(1), 47–54 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Matthews DE, Yates JR III. Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Anal. Chem. 76(17), 4951–4959 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley AA, Packer NH. The importance of protein co- and post-translational modifications in proteome projects. In: Proteome Research: New Frontiers in Functional Genomics. Wilkins MR, Williams KL, Appel RD, Hochstrasser DF (Eds), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 65–91 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Corthals GL, Wasinger VC, Hochstrasser DF, Sanchez JC. The dynamic range of protein expression: a challenge for proteomic research. Electrophoresis 21(6), 1104–1115 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirumalai RS, Chan KC, Prieto DA, Issaq HJ, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD. Characterization of the low molecular weight human serum proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2(10), 1096–1103 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1(11), 845–867 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elortza F, Nuhse TS, Foster LJ, Stensballe A, Peck SC, Jensen ON. Proteomic analysis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2(12), 1261–1270 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdolzade-Bavil A, Hayes S, Goretzki L, Kroger M, Anders J, Hendriks R. Convenient and versatile subcellular extraction procedure, that facilitates classical protein expression profiling and functional protein analysis. Proteomics 4(5), 1397–1405 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreger M. Subcellular proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 22(1), 27–56 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper R, Su Q, Gatlin CL, Huang ST, Anderson NL, Steiner S. Multi-component immunoaffinity subtraction chromatography: an innovative step towards a comprehensive survey of the human plasma proteome. Proteomics 3(4), 422–432 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescuyer P, Hochstrasser DF, Sanchez JC. Comprehensive proteome analysis by chromatographic protein prefractionation. Electrophoresis 25(7–8), 1125–1135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Lee K, Speicher DW. Electrophoretic prefractionation for comprehensive analysis of proteomes. In: Proteome Analysis. Interpreting the Genome. Speicher DW (Ed.), Elsevier, The Netherlands, 93–118 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Righetti PG, Castagna A, Herbert B, Reymond F, Rossier JS. Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis. Proteomics 3(8), 1397–1407 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righetti PG, Castagna A, Antonioli P, Boschetti E. Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis: the mining tools of the third millennium. Electrophoresis 26(2), 297–319 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier M. Recycling isoelectric focusing and isotachophoresis. Electrophoresis 19(7), 1057–1063 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H, Kachman MT, Schwartz DR, Cho KR, Lubman DM. Comprehensive proteome analysis of ovarian cancers using liquid phase separation, mass mapping and tandem mass spectrometry: a strategy for identification of candidate cancer biomarkers. Proteomics 4(8), 2476–2495 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubman DM, Kachman MT, Wang H et al. Two-dimensional liquid separations–mass mapping of proteins from human cancer cell lysates. J. Chromatogr. B 782(1–2), 183–96 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse C, Nilsson CL, Blennow K, Davidsson P. Identification of the apolipoprotein E4 isoform in cerebrospinal fluid with preparative two-dimensional electrophoresis and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 22(9), 1834–1837 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang TQ, Ginter JM, Johnston MV, Larsen BS, McEwen CN. Carrier ampholyte-free solution isoelectric focusing as a prefractionation method for the proteomic analysis of complex protein mixtures. Electrophoresis 24(14), 2359–2368 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Righetti PG, Wenisch E, Faupel M. Preparative protein purification in a multi-compartment electrolyser with immobiline membranes. J. Chromatogr. 475, 293–309 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert B, Righetti PG. A turning point in proteome analysis: sample prefractionation via multicompartment electrolyzers with isoelectric membranes. Electrophoresis 21(17), 3639–3648 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righetti PG, Wenisch E, Jungbauer A, Katinger H, Faupel M. Preparative purification of human monoclonal antibody isoforms in a multi-compartment electrolyser with immobiline membranes. J. Chromatogr. 500, 681–696 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Speicher DW. A method for global analysis of complex proteomes using sample prefractionation by solution isoelectrofocusing prior to two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 284(2), 266–278 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Speicher DW. Comprehensive analysis of complex proteomes using microscale solution isoelectrofocusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2(1), 58–68 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Hembach P, Echan L, Speicher DW. Enhanced analysis of human breast cancer proteomes using micro-scale solution isoelectrofocusing combined with high resolution 1D and 2D gels. J. Chromatogr. B 782(1–2), 253–265 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Echan L, Hembach P et al. Towards global analysis of mammalian proteomes using sample prefractionation prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels and using one-dimensional gels for insoluble and large proteins. Electrophoresis 22(9), 1603–1615 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echan LA, Tang H-Y, Ali-Khan N, Lee K, Speicher DW. Depletion of multiple high abundance proteins improves protein profiling capacities of human serum and plasma. Proteomics (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tang H-Y, Ali-Khan N, Echan LA, Levenkova N, Rux JJ, Speicher DW. A novel 4-dimensional strategy combining protein and peptide separation methods enables detection of low abundance proteins in human plasma and serum proteomes. Proteomics (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Lee K-B, Speicher DW. Fractionation of complex proteomes by microscale solution isoelectrofocusing using ZOOM IEF Fractionators to improve protein profiling. In: The Proteome Handbook. Walker JM (Ed.), Humana Press, Inc., NJ, USA, 97–117 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Lee K, Ali-Khan N, Speicher DW. Protein profiling by microscale solution isoelectrofocusing (MicroSol-IEF). In: Current Protocols in Protein Science. Coligan JE, Dunn BM, Speicher DW, Wingfield PT (Eds), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, USA (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Speicher DW. Microscale solution isoelectrofocusing: a sample prefractionation method for comprehensive proteome analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 244, 361–375 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wildgruber R, Harder A, Obermaier C et al. Towards higher resolution: two-dimensional electrophoresis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins using overlapping narrow immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21(13), 2610–2616 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omenn GS. The Human Proteome Organization Plasma Proteome Project pilot phase: reference specimens, technology platform comparisons, and standardized data submissions and analyses. Proteomics 4(5), 1235–1240 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherberich JE, Nockher WA. Blood monocyte phenotypes and soluble endotoxin receptor CD14 in systemic inflammatory diseases and patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 15(5), 574–578 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hara I, Miyake H, Yamanaka K, Hara S, Kamidono S. Serum cathepsin D and its density in men with prostate cancer as new predictors of disease progression. Oncol. Rep. 9(6), 1379–1383 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leto G, Tumminello FM, Crescimanno M, Flandina C, Gebbia N. Cathepsin D expression levels in nongynecological solid tumors: clinical and therapeutic implications. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 21(2), 91–106 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins JN, Varnum SM, Auberry KJ et al. Toward a human blood serum proteome: analysis by multidimensional separation coupled with mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1(12), 947–955 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Jacobs JM, Camp DG II et al. Ultra-high-efficiency strong cation exchange LC/RPLC/MS/MS for high dynamic range characterization of the human plasma proteome. Anal. Chem. 76(4), 1134–1144 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz RL, Ji H, Schutz F et al. A proteome strategy for fractionating proteins and peptides using continuous free-flow electrophoresis coupled off-line to reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 76(16), 4811–4824 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghiu L, Lathrop J, Lomas L, Hammond D, Boschetti E. New method of reducing the concentration range of proteins in serum using a combinatorial library of solid-phase ligands. Sixth Siena Meeting, From Genome to Proteome: Biomarker Discovery and Proteome Imaging. Siena, Italy (2004).
   Google Scholar